Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 8

Evaluating functional capacity, and mortality effects in the presence of atrial electromechanical conduction delay in patients with systolic heart failure

Pages
579–586
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The incidence of mortality was significantly higher in patients with prolonged atrial EMCD (p=0.025), and 5 patients in the HF group died during the study over the 12-month follow-up period.Conclusions: In this study, we found a relationship between prolonged atrial conduction time and increased functional class and mortality in patients with systolic HF.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Atrial functions are relatively suppressed in heart failure (HF).
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to investigate the associations of intra- and inter-atrial electromechanical conduction delay (EMCD) with functional class and mortality over a 12-month follow-up period.Methods: The prospective study included 65 patients with systolic HF and 65 healthy subjects with normal sinus rhythm.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The incidence of mortality was significantly higher in patients with prolonged atrial EMCD (p=0.025), and 5 patients in the HF group died during the study over the 12-month follow-up period.Conclusions: In this study, we found a relationship between prolonged atrial conduction time and increased functional class and mortality in patients with systolic HF.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Atrial functions are relatively suppressed in heart failure (HF). We aimed to investigate the associations of intra- and inter-atrial electromechanical conduction delay (EMCD) with functional class and mortality over a 12-month follow-up period.Methods: The prospective study included 65 patients with systolic HF and 65 healthy subjects with normal sinus rhythm. Left ventricular (LV) systolic functions and left atrial (LA) dimensions and volumes were evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) signals at the lateral border of the mitral annulus (lateral PA'), septal mitral annulus (septal PA'), and tricuspid annulus (tricuspid PA') were measured. Intra- and inter-atrial EMCD were calculated.Results: Mitral inflow velocities were studied using pulsed-wave Doppler after placing the sample volume at the leaflets' tips. The peak early (E wave) and late (A wave) velocities were measured. The septal annular E/E' ratio was relatively higher and lateral, septal, and right ventricular S, E', and A' waves were significantly lower in the HF group than in the control group (12.49±6.03 - 7.16±1.75, pE/E' <0.0001). Intra-atrial EMCD was detected as 117.5 ms and inter-atrial EMCD as 127.5 ms in patients with prolonged atrial EMCD. A significant increase was found in prolonged intraand inter-atrial EMCD according to functional capacity increase (p=0.012 and p=0.031, respectively). The incidence of mortality was significantly higher in patients with prolonged atrial EMCD (p=0.025), and 5 patients in the HF group died during the study over the 12-month follow-up period.Conclusions: In this study, we found a relationship between prolonged atrial conduction time and increased functional class and mortality in patients with systolic HF.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİN, M., YILDIZ, B. S., TÜLÜCE, K., GÜL, İ., ALKAN, M. B., SAYIN, A., İSLAMLI, A., EFE, T. H., ALİHANOĞLU, Y. İ., ZOGHİ, M., AKIN, M. (2016). Evaluating functional capacity, and mortality effects in the presence of atrial electromechanical conduction delay in patients with systolic heart failure. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 8, 579–586. https://ajindex.com/articles/365518

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Thomas L, Levett K, Boyd A, Leung DY, Schiller NB, Ross DL. Com- pensatory changes in atrial volumes with normal aging: is atrial en- largement inevitable? J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 40: 1630-5.
  2. Hof I, Chilukuri K, Arbab-Zadeh A, Scherr D, Dalal D, Nazarian S, et al. Does left atrial volume and pulmonary venous anatomy predict the outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2009; 20: 1005-10.
  3. Abecasis J, Dourado R, Ferreira A, Saraiva C, Cavaco D, Santos KR, et al. Left atrial volume calculated by multi-detector computed tomography may predict successful pulmonary vein isolation in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace 2009; 11: 1289-94.
  4. Acar G, Sayarlıoğlu M, Akçay A, Sökmen A, Sökmen G, Yalçıntaş S, et al. Evaluation of atrial electromechanical delay and left atrial mechanical functions in patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2009; 37: 447-53.
  5. Daubert JC, Pavin D, Jauvert G, Mabo P. Intra- and interatrial con- duction delay: implications for cardiac pacing. Pacing Clin Electro- physiol 2004; 27: 507-25.
  6. Rein AJ, O'Donnell CP, Colan SD, Marx GR. Tissue velocity Doppler assessment of atrial and ventricular electromechanical coupling and atrioventricular time intervals in normal subjects. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 1347-50.
  7. Özer N, Yavuz B, Can I, Atalar E, Aksöyek S, Övünç K, et al. Doppler tissue evaluation of intra-atrial and interatrial electromechanical delay and comparison with P-wave dispersion in patients with mi- tral stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 945-8.
  8. Van Beeumen K, Duytschaever M, Tavernier R, Van de Veire N, De Sutter J. Intra-and interatrial asynchrony in patients with heart fail- ure. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 79-83.
  9. Dilaveris PE, Gialafos EJ, Sideris SK, Theopistou AM, Andrikopou- los GK, Kyriakidis M, et al. Simple electrocardiographic markers for the prediction of paroxysmal idiopathic atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 1998; 135: 733-8.
  10. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pel- likka PA, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a re- port from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 1440-63.
  11. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, Marino PN, Oh JK, Smiseth OA, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of