Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 10

Early and long-term outcomes and quality of life after concomitant mitral valve surgery, left atrial size reduction, and radiofrequency surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

Pages
797–803
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, we evaluated early and long-term results and quality of life (QOL) after simultaneous surgical radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of AF, left atrial reduction and mitral valve repair or replacement.Methods: Overall, 147 patients with mitral valve diseases who underwent mitral valve surgery were included in this prospective cohort study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most formidable supraventricular tachyarrhythmia, which worsens the natural course of mitral valve disease.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we evaluated early and long-term results and quality of life (QOL) after simultaneous surgical radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of AF, left atrial reduction and mitral valve repair or replacement.Methods: Overall, 147 patients with mitral valve diseases who underwent mitral valve surgery were included in this prospective cohort study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Performing concomitant surgery as surgical RFA, atrial reduction along with mitral valve surgery, improves QOL in the short- and long-term and reduces the feeling of heartbeat and discomfort
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most formidable supraventricular tachyarrhythmia, which worsens the natural course of mitral valve disease. In this study, we evaluated early and long-term results and quality of life (QOL) after simultaneous surgical radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of AF, left atrial reduction and mitral valve repair or replacement.Methods: Overall, 147 patients with mitral valve diseases who underwent mitral valve surgery were included in this prospective cohort study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of operation: the study group--patients after mitral valve surgery with concomitant radiofrequency surgical ablation and left atrial reduction procedure (54 patients), and the control group--patients undergoing only mitral valve surgery (93 cases). We assessed AF recurrence and sinus rhythm restoration rates and mortality rates, QOL measures, postoperative complications rates, and left atrial size during follow-up.Results: In the study group, sinus rhythm restoration rate in the early postoperative period was 63%, but at the time of discharge it reduced to 29%; after 6 months, it significantly increased to 72% and after 3 years, to 81% (p=0.02). In the control group, the sinus rhythm restored only in 14% after 1 year, and at 3 years, it was 22%, although in the early postoperative period it, was 43%. Analysis of left atrial size before and after surgery showed that dimension significantly reduced in both groups (study group, p=0.013; control group, p=0.024). In addition, in patients undergoing surgical RFA procedure, there was a significant association between shorter heart disease history (p=0.02) and shorter AF history (p=0.074) with maintenance of sinus rhythm. The mortality rate in the study group was 4% (two patients) and in the control group 5% (five patients). Comparison of QOL measures between study and control groups after 1 year showed that patients undergoing concomitant atrial reduction surgery and RFA had significant improvement of QOL physical (p=0.03) and role (p=0.03) functioning, heartbeat (p=0.01), general (p=0.03) and mental health (p=0.01), vitality (p=0.007), and social role (p=0.02) functioning measures as compared to preoperative state, being higher than in patients who underwent only mitral valve surgery.Conclusion: Application of surgical RFA using irrigated cooling electrode and atrial reduction during mitral valve surgery is associated with higher restoration and maintenance of SR as compared to patients undergoing only mitral valve surgery. We did not observe complications related to AF surgery that required permanent pacemaker implantation. Performing concomitant surgery as surgical RFA, atrial reduction along with mitral valve surgery, improves QOL in the short- and long-term and reduces the feeling of heartbeat and discomfort

🔖

Cite This Article

JOSHİBAYEV, S., BOLATBEKOV, B. (2016). Early and long-term outcomes and quality of life after concomitant mitral valve surgery, left atrial size reduction, and radiofrequency surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 10, 797–803. https://ajindex.com/articles/365488

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Baek MJ, Na CY, Oh SS, Lee CH, Kim JH, Seo HJ, et al. Surgical treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation combined with rheumatic mitral valve disease: effects of the cryo-maze procedure and pre- dictors for late recurrence. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30: 728- 36. Thrall G, Lane D, Carroll D, Lip GY. Quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Am J Med 2006; 119: 448.e1- 19. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framing- ham Heart Study. Circulation 1998; 98: 946-52.
  2. Evsesina OV, Yakushin SS. Depression, anxiety and quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation. Russian Biomedical Herald 2009; 1: 80-7.
  3. Goldsmith IR, Lip GY, Patel RL. A prospective study of changes in the quality of life of patients following mitral valve repair and re- placement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 20: 949-55.
  4. Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada R, Camm AJ, Chen SA, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert consensus statement on cath- eter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Euro- pace 2012; 14: 528-606.
  5. Wang J, Meng X, Li H, Cui Y, Han J, Xu C. Prospective randomized comparison of left atrial or biatrial radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35: 116-22.
  6. Lan RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pel- likka PA, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr 2006; 7:79-108.
  7. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SK. SF-36® Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User's Manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, 1994.
  8. Patwardhan AM, Dave HH, Tamhane AA, Pandit SP, Dalvi BV, Golam K, et al. Intraoperative radiofrequency microbipolar coagulation to replace incisions of maze III procedure for correcting atrial fibrilla- tion in patients with rheumatic valvular disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997; 12: 627-33.
  9. Sie HT, Beukema WP, Anand R, Misier R, et al. Radiofrequency modified maze in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing con- comitant cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 122: 249- 56. Chiappini B, Martin-Suarez S, LoForte A, et al. Cox/Maze III opera- tion versus radiofrequency ablation for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation: a comparative study. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 87-92. Beukema W