Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 10

CHADS-VASc-HS score in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: assessment of coronary artery disease severity and complexity and comparison to other scoring systems in the prediction of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events

Pages
742–748
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it may playan important role as a predictive model of NSTE-ACS patients in clinical practice. (Anatol J Cardiol 2016; 16: 742-8)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We recently described the CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score as a novel predictor of coronary artery disease (CAD) severity in stable CAD patients.We aimed to assess the accuracy of the CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score in the determination of CAD severity and complexity and its availabilityin the risk stratification of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS)patients.Methods: We prospectively analyzed the clinical and angiographic data of consecutive NSTE-ACS patients in our clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were classifiedinto three tertiles according to their SYNTAX score (SS): tertile 1 had an SS of 0–22; tertile 2 had an SS of 23–32; and tertile 3 had an SS of >32.There were no specific exclusion criteria except for previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) because SS was validated for only nativecoronary arteries for this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it may playan important role as a predictive model of NSTE-ACS patients in clinical practice. (Anatol J Cardiol 2016; 16: 742-8)
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: We recently described the CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score as a novel predictor of coronary artery disease (CAD) severity in stable CAD patients.We aimed to assess the accuracy of the CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score in the determination of CAD severity and complexity and its availabilityin the risk stratification of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS)patients.Methods: We prospectively analyzed the clinical and angiographic data of consecutive NSTE-ACS patients in our clinic. Patients were classifiedinto three tertiles according to their SYNTAX score (SS): tertile 1 had an SS of 0–22; tertile 2 had an SS of 23–32; and tertile 3 had an SS of >32.There were no specific exclusion criteria except for previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) because SS was validated for only nativecoronary arteries for this study. We used the following analyses: χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests, one-way analysis of variance or Kruskal–Wallis tests,Pearson’s or Spearman’s tests, the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) or C-statistic, andpairwise comparisons of the ROC curves.Results: A total of 252 patients were enrolled. There were 131 patients in tertile 1, 79 in tertile 2, and 42 in tertile 3. The number of diseasedvessels was correlated with the Global Registry for Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) (p 5 with a sensitivity of 69.6% and specificity of 90.3% (AUC: 0.804, 95%: CI 0.750–0.851, p<0.001). We also comparedthe diagnostic accuracy of the CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score with the TIMI and GRACE risk scores in the determination of the in-hospital MACE andfound no differences.Conclusion: The CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score was positively correlated with the severity and complexity of CAD. We also found that CHA2DS2-VASc-HS was comparable with other risk scores for the risk stratification of the in-hospital MACE of NSTE-ACS patients. Therefore, it may playan important role as a predictive model of NSTE-ACS patients in clinical practice. (Anatol J Cardiol 2016; 16: 742-8)

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞOLAR, H., ÇETİN, M., BALLI, M., BAYRAMOĞLU, A., OTLU, Y. Ö., TÜRKMEN, S., AKTÜRK, E. (2016). CHADS-VASc-HS score in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: assessment of coronary artery disease severity and complexity and comparison to other scoring systems in the prediction of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 10, 742–748. https://ajindex.com/articles/365484

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, Graham I, Reiner Z, Verschuren M, et al. European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Reha- bilitation (EACPR); ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clini- cal practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the Euro- pean Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representa- tives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 1635-701.
  2. Wright RS, Anderson JL, Adams CD, Bridges CR, Casey DE Jr, Et- tinger SM, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update of the Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST- Elevation Myocardial Infarction (updating the 2007 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and So- ciety of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 1920-59.
  3. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folliguet T, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiol- ogy (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Sur- gery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2501-55.
  4. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, McCabe CH, Horacek T, Papuch- is G, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA 2000; 284: 835-42.
  5. Eagle KA, Lim MJ, Dabbous OH, Pieper KS, Goldberg RJ, Van de Werf F, et al. A validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndrome: estimating the risk of 6- month postdischarge death in an international registry. JAMA 2004; 291: 2727-33.
  6. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, Morice MC, Colombo A, Dawkins K, et al. The SYNTAX score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 2005;1: 219-27.
  7. Çetin M, Çakıcı M, Zencir C, Taşolar H, Baysal E, Ballı M, et al. Prediction of coronary artery disease severity using CHADS2 and CHA score. Am J Cardiol 2014; 113: 950-6.
  8. Farooq V, Girasis C, Magro M, Onuma Y, Morel MA, Heo JH, et al. The CABG SYNTAX Score - an angiographic tool to grade the com- plexity of coronary disease following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: from the SYNTAX Left Ma