Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 5

GuideLiner catheter application in complex coronary lesions: experience of two centers

Pages
333–339
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The device effectively allowed stent delivery in challenging lesions, where conventional techniques have failed, without major complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: GuideLiner catheter provides adequate back-up support and a coaxial guide engagement for stent delivery in complex coronary anatomies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we aimed to present one of the largest series of experience with GuideLiner catheter utilized for challenging percutaneous coronary interventions in two centers.Methods: We retrospectively collected the coronary angiography records of 64 patients between January 1, 2012 and August 1, 2014 in whom conventional techniques failed for stent delivery and 5-in-6 Fr GuideLiner catheter was used for this purpose.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The device effectively allowed stent delivery in challenging lesions, where conventional techniques have failed, without major complications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: GuideLiner catheter provides adequate back-up support and a coaxial guide engagement for stent delivery in complex coronary anatomies. In this study, we aimed to present one of the largest series of experience with GuideLiner catheter utilized for challenging percutaneous coronary interventions in two centers.Methods: We retrospectively collected the coronary angiography records of 64 patients between January 1, 2012 and August 1, 2014 in whom conventional techniques failed for stent delivery and 5-in-6 Fr GuideLiner catheter was used for this purpose. The data were assessed in terms of the lesion characteristics, procedural success, and complications. Descriptive statistics and frequencies were used in statistical analyses.Results: The mean age of the patients was 69.8±10.0 years. Femoral approach was employed in all cases. Lesions were mostly (90.6%) class B2 or C according to the AHA/ACC lesion classification. The GuideLiner catheter was mainly used to increase back-up of the guide catheter (85.9%), and in 95.3% of all cases, the procedure was successful. The mean depth of the GuideLiner catheter intubation was 30.3±21.6 mm. None of the patients had coronary dissection or major complications.Conclusion: In this study, we presented a large registry of two centers used the GuideLiner catheter. The device effectively allowed stent delivery in challenging lesions, where conventional techniques have failed, without major complications.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURSUN, H., TAŞTAN, A., TANRIVERDİ, Z., ÖZEL, E., KAYA, D. (2016). GuideLiner catheter application in complex coronary lesions: experience of two centers. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 5, 333–339. https://ajindex.com/articles/365462

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Morice MC, Colombo A, Meier B, Serruys P, Tamburino C, Guaqliumi G, et al; REALITY Trial Investigators. Sirolimus vs Paclitaxel eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions. JAMA 2006; 295: 895-904
  2. Nikolsky E, Gruberg L, Pechersky S, Kapeliovich M, Grenadier E, Amikam S, et al. Stent deployment failure: reasons, implications, and short- and long-term outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 59: 324-8
  3. Jafary FH. When one won’t do it, use two-double ‘‘buddy’’ wiring to facilitate stent advancement across a highly calcified artery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 67: 721-3
  4. Mezilis N, Dardas P, Ninios V, Tsikaderis D. Rotablation in the drug eluting era: immediate and long-term results from a single center experience. J Interv Cardiol 2010; 23: 249-53
  5. Rao U, Gorog D, Syzgula J, Kumar S, Stone C, Kukreja N. The GuideLiner \"child\" catheter. EuroIntervention 2010; 6: 277-9
  6. Mamas MA, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Fraser DG. Distal stent delivery with GuideLiner catheter: first in man experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76: 102-11
  7. Cola C, Miranda F, Vaquerizo B, Fantuzzi A, Bruquera J. The GuideLiner™ catheter for stent delivery in difficult cases: tips and tricks. J Interv Cardiol 2011; 24: 450-61
  8. García-Blas S, Núñez J, Mainar L, Miñana G, Bonanad C, Racugno P, et al. Usefulness and Safety of a Guide Catheter Extension System for the Percutaneous Treatment of Complex Coronary Lesions by a Transradial Approach. Med Princ Pract 2015; 24: 171-7
  9. Eddin MJ, Armstrong EJ, Javed U, Rogers JH. Transradial interventions with the GuideLiner catheter: role of proximal vessel angulation. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2013; 14: 275-9
  10. Chan PH, Alegria-Barrero E, Foin N, Paulo M, Lindsay AC, Viceconte N, et al. Extended use of the GuideLiner in complex coronary interventions. Eurointervention (serial online) 2014 June. Available from: http:// www.pcronline.com/eurointervention/ahead _of print/ 201406-02/ 11. Farooq V, Mamas MA, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Fraser DG. The use of a guide catheter extension system as an aid during transradial percutaneous coronary intervention of coronary artery bypass grafts. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 78: 847-63
  11. Papayannis AC, Michael TT, Brilakis ES. Challenges associated with use of the GuideLiner catheter in percutaneous coronary interventions. J Invasive Cardiol 2012; 24: 370-1
  12. Stys AT, Stys TP, Rajpurohit N, Khan MA. A novel application of GuideLiner catheter for thrombectomy in acute myocardial in