Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 5

Aortic propagation velocity does not correlate with classical aortic stiffness parameters in healthy individuals

Pages
340–346
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The clinical and research applicability of APV should be further evaluated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Aortic stiffness is an important cardiovascular risk marker, which can be determined using different noninvasive techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In total, 97 consecutive healthy subjects were recruited in this observational study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The clinical and research applicability of APV should be further evaluated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Aortic stiffness is an important cardiovascular risk marker, which can be determined using different noninvasive techniques. Aortic propagation velocity (APV) has recently been established as a novel echocardiographic parameter of aortic stiffness. This study aimed to investigate the association between APV and the classical echocardiography-derived aortic stiffness parameters, aortic distensibility (AD) and aortic strain (AS), in a group of otherwise healthy individuals. Methods: In total, 97 consecutive healthy subjects were recruited in this observational study. APV was measured using color M-mode echocardiography from the suprasternal window in the descending aorta. AS and AD were calculated using clinical blood pressure and the M-mode echocardiography-derived aortic diameters. Correlation analyses were performed between cardiovascular risk factors related to increased aortic stiffness (age, obesity, and blood pressure) and measured stiffness parameters (APV, AS, and AD). Correlation analyses were also performed among the measured stiffness parameters.Results: Good correlation of age, blood pressure, and BMI with AS and AD was observed. One-on-one correlation of age, blood pressure, and BMI with APV was not observed. No correlation was observed between APV and AS (r=-0.05, p=0.6) or between APV and AD (r=-0.17, p=0.8).Conclusion: Although APV has been proposed as a novel and practical echocardiographic parameter of aortic stiffness, especially in patients with coronary artery disease, correlations between classical stiffness parameters (AS and AD) and APV were absent in healthy individuals at low-intermediate risk. The clinical and research applicability of APV should be further evaluated.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARI, H., KAHRAMAN, F., TÜRKER, Y., GÜLER, S., BAŞ, H. A., ERDOĞAN, D. (2017). Aortic propagation velocity does not correlate with classical aortic stiffness parameters in healthy individuals. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 5, 340–346. https://ajindex.com/articles/365394

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aggoun Y, Bonnet D, Sidi D, Girardet JP, Brucker E, Polak M, et al. Arterial mechanical changes in children with familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000; 20: 2070-5
  2. Stefanadis C, Wooley CF, Bush CA, Kolibash AJ, Boudoulas H. Aortic distensibility abnormalities in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 1300-4
  3. Gac P, Poreba M, Mazur G, Poreba R. The aortic mechanical properties in patients with the essential hypertension environmentally exposed to cigarette smoke. Inhal Toxicol 2015; 27: 717-23
  4. Avolio AP, Chen SG, Wang RP, Zhang CL, Li MF, O'Rourke MF. Effects of aging on changing arterial compliance and left ventricular load in a northern Chinese urban community. Circulation 1983; 68: 50-8
  5. McEniery CM, Yasmin, Hall IR, Qasem A, Wilkinson IB, Cockcroft JR. Normal vascular aging: differential effects on wave reflection and aortic pulse wave velocity: the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial (ACCT). J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1753-60
  6. Cecelja M, Chowienczyk P. Role of arterial stiffness in cardiovascular disease. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis 2012;1
  7. Henry RM, Kostense PJ, Spijkerman AM, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Heine RJ, et al. Arterial stiffness increases with deteriorating glucose tolerance status: the Hoorn Study. Circulation 2003; 107: 2089-95
  8. Schram MT, Henry RM, van Dijk RA, Kostense PJ, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, et al. Increased central artery stiffness in impaired glucose metabolism and type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn Study. Hypertension 2004; 43: 176-81
  9. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 2588-605
  10. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 1318-27
  11. Yıldız A, Gür M, Yılmaz R, Demirbağ R. The association of elasticity indexes of ascending aorta and the presence and the severity of coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis 2008; 19: 311-7
  12. Lu Q, Liu H. Correlation of ascending aorta elasticity and the severity of coronary artery stenosis in hypertensive patients with coronary heart disease assessed by M-mode and tissue Doppler echocardiography. Cell Biochem Biophys 2015; 71: 785-8
  13. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M, et al: The Task Force for the man