Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Urban and rural differences in hypertension risk factors in Turkey

Pages
39–47
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Taking into account the variations between urban and rural areas in HT development may provide greater insight into the design of prevention strategies

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Existing literature shows considerable regional differences in terms of hypertension (HT) prevalence in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study was to analyze some of the known HT risk factors contributing to the variations between urban and rural areas of Turkey in HT development.Methods: We used data from the 2011 Chronic Diseases and Risk Factors Survey that was conducted by the Turkish Ministry of Health on a representative sample of the Turkish adult population aged 20 years or more (n=16.227).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Taking into account the variations between urban and rural areas in HT development may provide greater insight into the design of prevention strategies
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Existing literature shows considerable regional differences in terms of hypertension (HT) prevalence in Turkey. The purpose of this study was to analyze some of the known HT risk factors contributing to the variations between urban and rural areas of Turkey in HT development.Methods: We used data from the 2011 Chronic Diseases and Risk Factors Survey that was conducted by the Turkish Ministry of Health on a representative sample of the Turkish adult population aged 20 years or more (n=16.227). HT was defined as having at least one of the following: a mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure of at least 140/90 mm Hg, a previously diagnosed disease, or use of antihypertensive medication. Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis was used to estimate HT risk factors in urban and rural settings.Results: Although the HT prevalence was higher in rural areas (28.4%) than in urban areas (23.9%), in this study, urbanization was found to be a contributing factor in multivariate regression analysis. Furthermore, separate regressions for urban and rural settings revealed that age, obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and smoking were independently and positively associated (p<0.05) with HT in both settings, while marital status, employment type, mental health, and lifestyle patterns; nutritional habits; and amount of physical activity and sedentary time (p<0.05) were risk indicators in urban areas only.Conclusion: The findings of our study demonstrate that contributory factors show some variations between urban and rural settings, and on gender within each setting. Taking into account the variations between urban and rural areas in HT development may provide greater insight into the design of prevention strategies

🔖

Cite This Article

DAŞTAN, İ., EREM, A., ÇETİNKAYA, V. (2017). Urban and rural differences in hypertension risk factors in Turkey. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 39–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/365393

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Lawes CM, Vander Hoorn S, Rodgers A. Global burden of blood- pressure-related disease, 2001. Lancet 2008; 371: 1513-8.
  2. World Health Organization, Global Status Report on Noncommuni- cable Diseases 2010,
  3. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
  4. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet 2005; 365: 217-23.
  5. Conen D, Glynn RJ, Ridker PM, Buring JE, Albert MA. Socioeco- nomic status, blood pressure progression, and incident hyperten- sion in a prospective cohort of female health professionals. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 1378-84.
  6. Levine DA, Lewis CE, Williams OD, Safford MM, Liu K, Calhoun DA, et al. Geographic and demographic variability in 20-year hyperten- sion incidence: the CARDIA study. Hypertension 2011; 57: 39-47.
  7. Erceg M, Kern J, Babic-Erceg A, Iviceviv-Uhernik A, Vuletic S. Re- gional differences in the prevalence of arterial hypertension in Croatia. Coll Antropol 2009; 33: 19-23.
  8. Altun B, Arıcı M, Nergizoğlu G, Derici U, Karatan O, Turgan C, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Turkey (the PatenT study) in 2003. J Hypertens 2005; 23: 1817-23.
  9. Süleymanlar G, Utaş C, Arınsoy T, Ateş K, Altun B, Altıparmak MR, et al. A population-based survey of Chronic REnal Disease In Turkey- the CREDIT study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26: 1862-71. Özdemir H. Türkiye’de İç Göçler Üzerine Genel bir Değerlendirme. Akademik Bakış Dergisi 2012; 30: 1-18.
  10. Ünal B, Ergör G, Horasan GD. Türkiye Kronik Hastalıklar ve Risk Fak- törleri Sıklığı Çalışması. Ankara: Sağlık Bakanlığı; 2013. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu. Türkiye Kronik Hastalıklar ve Risk Faktörlerinin Sıklığı Çalışması. Ankara: 2013. http://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/Ekutuphane/kitaplar/khrfat.pdf Access date: 12/03/2016. Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560-72.
  11. James WP, Ferro-Luzzi A, Waterlow JC. Definition of chronic energy deficiency in adults. Report of a working party of the International Dietary Energy Consultative group. Eur J Clin Nutr 1988; 42: 961-81.
  12. Willet WC, Dietz WH, Colditz GA. Guidelines for healthy weight. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 427-34.
  13. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Whelton PK, He J. World- wide prevalence of hypertension: a systematic r