Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2017 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

Modified limb lead ECG system effects on electrocardiographic wave amplitudes and frontal plane axis in sinus rhythm subjects

Pages
46–55
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is evident that the MLL system produced deviations in frontal plane QRS axis which altered the diagnostic interpretation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Modified Limb Lead (MLL) ECG system may be used during rest or exercise ECG, or atrial activity enhancement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study investigated the effects of the modified limb electrode position on the electrocardiographic waveforms, ST segment amplitudes (STa) and frontal plane axis.Methods: The observational study included sixty sinus rhythm subjects of mean age 38.85±8.76 (SD) in the range 25 to 58 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is evident that the MLL system produced deviations in frontal plane QRS axis which altered the diagnostic interpretation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Modified Limb Lead (MLL) ECG system may be used during rest or exercise ECG, or atrial activity enhancement. Because of modification in the limb electrode placement, changes are likely to happen in ECG wave amplitudes and frontal plane axis, which may alter the clinical limits of normality and ECG diagnostic criteria. The present study investigated the effects of the modified limb electrode position on the electrocardiographic waveforms, ST segment amplitudes (STa) and frontal plane axis.Methods: The observational study included sixty sinus rhythm subjects of mean age 38.85±8.76 (SD) in the range 25 to 58 years. In addition to 12-lead ECG, MLL ECG was recorded with, the RA electrode placed in the 3rd right intercostal space to the right of the parasternal line, the LA electrode placed in the 5th right intercostal space to the right of the mid-clavicular line and the LL electrode placed in the 5th right intercostal space on the mid-clavicular line.Results: The modification produced profound changes in ECG wave amplitudes and STa amplitudes in frontal plane leads. The QRS and T wave axis shifted on the average by -17o and 41o, respectively, with considerable individual variation, which altered the diagnostic criteria.Conclusion: The ECG amplitudes and STa changes produced by the MLL system showed that all remains within the clinical limits, except the R wave amplitude in the modified lead I. It is evident that the MLL system produced deviations in frontal plane QRS axis which altered the diagnostic interpretation.

🔖

Cite This Article

JAYARAMAN, S., SANGAREDDİ, V., PERİYASAMY, R., JOSEPH, J., SHANMUGAM, R. M. (2017). Modified limb lead ECG system effects on electrocardiographic wave amplitudes and frontal plane axis in sinus rhythm subjects. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 46–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/365364

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Einthoven W. The different forms of the human electrocardiogram and their signification. Lancet 1912; 1: 853-61.
  2. Barnes AR, Pardee HEB, White PD, Wilson FN, Wolferth CC. Stan- dardization of precordial leads - Supplementary report. Am Heart J 1938; 15: 235-9. Webster JG. Reducing motion artifacts and interference in biopo- tential recording. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1984; 31: 823-6.
  3. Diamond D, Griffith DH, Greenberg ML, Carleton RA. Torso mounted electrocardiographic electrodes for routine clinical electrocardi- ography. J Electrocardiol 1979; 12: 403-6.
  4. Mason RE, Likar I. A new system of multiple-lead exercise electro- cardiography. Am Heart J 1966; 71: 196-205.
  5. Edenbrandt L, Pahlm O, Sornmo L. An accurate exercise lead sys- tem for bicycle ergometer tests. Eur Heart J 1989; 10: 268-72.
  6. Sevilla DC, Dohrmann ML, Somelofski CA, Wawrzynski RP, Wagner NB, Wagner GS. Invalidation of the resting electrocardiogram ob- tained via exercise electrode sites as a standard 12-lead record- ing. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 35-9.
  7. Krucoff MW, Loeffler KA, Haisty WK Jr, Pope JE, Sawchak ST, Wag- ner GS, et al. Simultaneous ST-segment measurements using stan- dard and monitoring-compatible torso limb lead placements at rest and during coronary occlusion. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74: 997-1001.
  8. Takuma K, Hori S, Sasaki J, Shinozawa Y, Yoshikawa T, Handa S, et al. An alternative limb lead system for electrocardiographs in emergency patients. Am J Emerg Med 1995; 13: 514-7.
  9. Gamble P, McManus H, Jensen D, Froelicher V. A comparison of the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram to exercise electrode place- ments. Chest 1984; 85: 616-22.
  10. Jowett NI, Turner AM, Cole A, Jones PA. Modified electrode place- ment must be recorded when performing 12-lead electrocardio- grams. Postgrad Med J 2005; 81: 122-5.
  11. Kleiner JP, Nelson WP, Boland MJ. 12-lead electrocardiogram in ex- ercise testing. A misleading baseline? Arch Intern Med 1978; 138: 1572-3.
  12. Pahlm O, Haisty WK Jr, Edenbrandt L, Wagner NB, Sevilla DC, Selvester RH, et al. Evaluation of changes in standard electro- cardiographic QRS waveforms recorded from activity-compatible proximal limb lead positions. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 253-7.
  13. Papouchado M, Walker PR, James MA, Clarke LM. Fundamental differences between the standard 12-lead electrocardiograph and the modified (Mason- Likar) exercise lead system. Eur Heart J 1987; 8: 725-33.
  14. Wiens RD, Chaitman BR. An alternate limb lead system for electro- cardiograms in emergency patients. Am J Emerg Med 1997; 1