Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 5

Role of no reflow and microvascular obstruction in the prognostic stratification of STEMI patients

Pages
346–349
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, in clinical practice, coronaryangiographic still remains the more widely used assessment technique for no reflow.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Effective reperfusion of ischemic myocardium is the final aim of both pharmacological and mechanical reperfusive strategies in patients withST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In contrast, ineffective reperfusion (noreflow) has been showed to be related to an increased rate of adverse events in the flow-up.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, in clinical practice, coronaryangiographic still remains the more widely used assessment technique for no reflow.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Effective reperfusion of ischemic myocardium is the final aim of both pharmacological and mechanical reperfusive strategies in patients withST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. More effective reperfusion is related to better prognosis. In contrast, ineffective reperfusion (noreflow) has been showed to be related to an increased rate of adverse events in the flow-up. Several techniques can be used to assess the effectivenessof reperfusion, and the evolved over the last decades according to the treatment methods but also to technological advancements.ST-segment resolution represented the only way to assess reperfusion in the era of pharmacological treatment. Later, angiographic assessmentbecame the gold standard to assess reperfusion after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. In the last years, cardiac magneticresonance showed improved accuracy and prognostic stratification ability compared with angiography. However, in clinical practice, coronaryangiographic still remains the more widely used assessment technique for no reflow.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURANTE, A. (2018). Role of no reflow and microvascular obstruction in the prognostic stratification of STEMI patients. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 5, 346–349. https://ajindex.com/articles/365326

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Hadamitzky M, Langhans B, Hausleiter J, Sonne C, Byrne RA, Mehilli J, et al. Prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in comparison with single-photon emission tomography using Tc99m-Sestamibi. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014
  2. [CrossRef] Stiermaier T, Thiele H, Eitel I. Coronary Microvascular Obstruction: Key Factor in the Prognosis of ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017
  3. e006568. [CrossRef] Eitel I, de Waha S, Wöhrle J, Fuernau G, Lurz P, Pauschinger M, et al. Comprehensive prognosis assessment by CMR imaging after STsegment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014
  4. [CrossRef] Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, Lugo-Olivieri CH, Barouch LA, Schulman SP, et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998
  5. [CrossRef] Taylor AJ, Al-Saadi N, Abdel-Aty H, Schulz-Menger J, Messroghli DR, Friedrich MG. Detection of acutely impaired microvascular reperfusion after infarct angioplasty with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2004
  6. [CrossRef] Rochitte CE, Lima JAC, Bluemke DA, Reeder SB, McVeigh ER, Furuta T, et al. Magnitude and time course of microvascular obstruction and tissue injury after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998
  7. [CrossRef] Galiuto L, Lombardo A, Maseri A, Santoro L, Porto I, Cianflone D, et al. Temporal evolution and functional outcome of no reflow: sustained and spontaneously reversible patterns following successful coronary recanalisation. Heart 2003
  8. [CrossRef] Durante A, Laricchia A, Benedetti G, Esposito A, Margonato A, Rimoldi O, et al. Identification of High-Risk Patients After ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Comparison Between Angiographic and Magnetic Resonance Parameters. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017
  9. e005841. [CrossRef] Fearon WF, Low AF, Yong AS, McGeoch R, Berry C, Shah MG, et al. Prognostic value of the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance measured after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2013
  10. [CrossRef] Fearon WF, Shah M, Ng M, Brinton T, Wilson A, Tremmel JA, et al. Predictive value of the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008
  11. [CrossRef] Lim HS, Yoon