Journals / TİSK Akademi / 2015 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20

Motivation Theories and Encouraging Public Employees Based on Individual Performance Evaluation

Motivasyon Teorileri ve Kamu Çalışanlarının Bireysel Performans Değerlendirme Temelinde Teşvik Edilmesi

Pages
270–285
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a conclusion, the importance of having an effective and efficient public employee system and human resource management system that considers motivation dimensions and employee’s performance which is evaluated by measurement to provide qualified public service and to achieve citizen satisfaction will be evaluated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Encouraging public employees to work more efficiently is one of the main topics of today’s public management issues.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Developing a well-functioning and a well-organized employee appraisal system that has instruments to encourage employees will bring a new breath to two actual and critic debates: motivation and performance appraisal.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a conclusion, the importance of having an effective and efficient public employee system and human resource management system that considers motivation dimensions and employee’s performance which is evaluated by measurement to provide qualified public service and to achieve citizen satisfaction will be evaluated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Encouraging public employees to work more efficiently is one of the main topics of today’s public management issues. Developing a well-functioning and a well-organized employee appraisal system that has instruments to encourage employees will bring a new breath to two actual and critic debates: motivation and performance appraisal. In this paper, the first focus will be on motivation process including various theories, employees’ needs and expectations and classifications of incentives and some suggestions. After then, performance appraisal system structure will be discussed and individual performance appraisal systems will be analyzed through its motivation dimensions. In this framework, relation amongst encourage, motivation and performance improvement will be analyzed and possible monetary and non-monetary incentive implications will be analyzed. As a conclusion, the importance of having an effective and efficient public employee system and human resource management system that considers motivation dimensions and employee’s performance which is evaluated by measurement to provide qualified public service and to achieve citizen satisfaction will be evaluated.

Özet

Kamu görevlilerinin daha verimli çalışmalarını sağlamak amacıyla motive edilmeleri günümüz kamu yönetiminin önemli meselelerinden birisidir. İşlevsel, iyi tasarlanmış ve çalışanları güdüleyici öğelere sahip bir bireysel performans değerlendirme sistemine sahip olmak, kamu kesiminin iki güncel ve kritik konusu olan motivasyon ve performans değerlendirmesine yeni bir soluk getirecektir. Bu çalışmada ilk olarak; çeşitli teorileri, çalışanların ihtiyaç ve beklentileri ile teşviklere ilişkin bir takım öneri ve sınıflandırmaları içerecek olan motivasyon sürecine değinilecektir. Ardından performans değerlendirme sisteminin yapısı üzerinde durulacak ve bireysel performans değerlendirme sistemleri motivasyon boyutuyla ele alınacaktır. Bu kapsamda teşvik, motivasyon ve performans artışı ilişkisi incelenecek, olası teşvik uygulamaları parasal ya da parasal olmayan ayrımıyla incelenecektir. Sonuç olarak, kaliteli kamu hizmeti sunabilmek ve vatandaşların memnuniyetini sağlayabilmek amacıyla etkin ve verimli bir kamu personel sistemi ile çalışanların performansının ölçülerek değerlendirildiği, motivasyon boyutunu dikkate alan bir insan kaynakları yönetimine sahip olmanın önemi değerlendirilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOZLU, A., KURTİPEK, R. (2015). Motivation Theories and Encouraging Public Employees Based on Individual Performance Evaluation. TİSK Akademi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20, 270–285. https://ajindex.com/articles/364685

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Aktan, C. C. (2005).
  2. Değişim Çağında Yönetim, İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık. Alford D. and J. O’Flynn (2012).Rethinking Public Service Delivery, Managing with External Providers. England: Palgrave Macmillan Distribution. Andrews, R., G.A. Boyne and R. M. Walker (2006). Subjective and Objective Measures of Organizational Performance: An Amprical Exploration Public Service Performance Perspectives on Measurement and Management, Cambridge. Apospori, E., Papalexandiris N. and Glanaki, E., (2005). Entreprenurial and Professional CEO’s, Differences in Motive and Responsibility Profile. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. Vol. 26, No. 2, 141-162. Archmann,S. and J. C. Iglesias (2010).e Government–A Driving Force for Innovation and Efficiency in Public Administration. EI-PASCOPE, Vol. 2010/1, 29-36.
  3. Bella, Nicola (2013). Experimental Evidence on the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and Job Performance. Public Administration Review. Vol. 73, January-February, Iss. 1, 143– 153. Berl, R.L. and Williamson, N.C. (1987). A Review of the Content Theories of Motivation as They Apply to Sales and Sales Management, American Business Review. Biget, Simon Anderfuhren, Frederic, V. and Giauque D. (2014). Policy Environment and Public Service Motivation. Public Administration. Vol. 92, No. 4, 807–825. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Binderkrantz, Anne Skorkjær, J. G. Christensen (2011). Agency Performance and Executive Pay in Government: An Empirical Test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. No. 22, 31–54. Cho, Y. J. and Perry, J. L. (2012). Intrinsic Motivation and Employee Attitudes: Role of Managerial Trustworthiness, Goal Directedness, and Extrinsic Reward Expectancy. Review of Public Personnel Administration. No. 32, 382 – 406. Eraslan,T. ve Tozlu A. (2011). Kamu Yönetiminde Performansa Dayalı Ücret Sistemi. Sayıştay Dergisi. Sayı 81, 33-61.
  4. Gilette, B. (2005). Pay for Performance Measurement Helps Set the Bar for Quality, Efficient Care. Managed Heatlhcare Executive. December, 2005.
  5. Hisrich, D.R. and Al-Dabbagh (2013).
  6. A., Governpreneurship, Establishing a Thriving Entrepreneurial Spirit in Government. Massachusetts: Edgar Elgar Publishing Limited. Holzer, M. and R.W. Shwester (2011).Public Administration: An Introduction. New Delhi: PHI Learning. Jreisat, J. (2012). Globalism and Comparative Public Administration. NW: Taylor and Francis Group CRC Press.
  7. Johns, G. and Saks, A.M., (2001). Organizational Behaviour. 5th Edition. USA: Pearson E