SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Kültür buğdayı (Triticum spp.) x yarı yabani buğday melezlemesinde heterosis üzerine bir araştırma

A research on heterosis in cultivated (Triticum spp.) x semi-wild wheat hybridization

H. ULUKAN
Pages
113–125
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Statistically significant correlations were fixed between (MP-Fi) and 8 6 3 2 traits; SL and PH traits were found have been impressed as to be more adventageous and stable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Direction and magnitude of mid-parent (MP) and high-parent (HP) heterosis were detected and estimated in 18 combinations, 180 FiS and 150 F s for plant height (PH); spike length (SL); number of spike per plant 2 (NS), number of spikelet per spike (NSP) and number of grain per spikelet (NG).
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this, 9 females (7 commons Triticum aestivum (L.) Em. (Thell), P = Aköz 867, P = Köse 220/39, P = Penjamo 62, P = Sivas 5 7 9 10 111/33, Pn = Siirak 1593/51, P = Sertak 52 and P = Yektay 406 and 2 durums (Triticum durum Desf., Pi = 12 13 Kunduru 414/44 and P = Kundura 1149) and 4 semi wild males (P = T. dicoccum., 2n = 28; P = T. 4 2 3 carthlicum; Pe = T. vavilovi and P = T. spelta., 2n = 42) were hybridized.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Statistically significant correlations were fixed between (MP-Fi) and 8 6 3 2 traits; SL and PH traits were found have been impressed as to be more adventageous and stable.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Triticum · kültür çeşitleri · genetik çeşitlilik

Abstract

Direction and magnitude of mid-parent (MP) and high-parent (HP) heterosis were detected and estimated in 18 combinations, 180 FiS and 150 F s for plant height (PH); spike length (SL); number of spike per plant 2 (NS), number of spikelet per spike (NSP) and number of grain per spikelet (NG). For this, 9 females (7 commons Triticum aestivum (L.) Em. (Thell), P = Aköz 867, P = Köse 220/39, P = Penjamo 62, P = Sivas 5 7 9 10 111/33, Pn = Siirak 1593/51, P = Sertak 52 and P = Yektay 406 and 2 durums (Triticum durum Desf., Pi = 12 13 Kunduru 414/44 and P = Kundura 1149) and 4 semi wild males (P = T. dicoccum., 2n = 28; P = T. 4 2 3 carthlicum; Pe = T. vavilovi and P = T. spelta., 2n = 42) were hybridized. The MP was varied between - 8 33.1% (Pi xP ) at the Fi for the NG and 152.6% P x P at the F for the NS; the HP was ranged between - 3 8 7 8 2 71.2% (P xP ) at the F2 for the NGand 135.3% (P xP ) at the Fi for the NS. Heterosis effect was appeared 7 8 7 8 mostly on the SL and PH; but fixed the highest on the NS and NSP in the each generation. The semi wilds were ordered as to be P >P >P >P . Statistically significant correlations were fixed between (MP-Fi) and 8 6 3 2 traits; SL and PH traits were found have been impressed as to be more adventageous and stable.

Özet

Bitki boyu (PH), başak uzunluğu (SL), bitkide başak sayısı (NS), başakta başakçık sayısı (NSP) ve başakçıkta tane sayısı (NG) bakımından anaç ortalaması (MP) ile üstün anaç (HP) heterosisinin şiddeti ve yönü 18 kombinasyon, 180 Fi ve 150 F bitkisinde saptanmıştır. Bunun için, 9 ana (7 ekmeklik Triticum 2 aestivum (L.) Em. (Thell), P = Aköz 867, P = Köse 220/39, P = Penjamo 62, P = Sivas 111/33, Pn = 5 7 9 ıo Sürak 1593/51, Pı = Sertak 52 and Pı = Yektay 406 ve 2 makarnalık Triticum durum Desf., Pı = Kunduru 2 3 414/44, P = Kunduru 1149) ile 4 yarı yabani baba (P = T. dicoccum., 2n = 28; P = T. carthlicum; P = T. 4 2 3 6 vavilovi and P = T. spelta., 2n = 42) anaç melezlenmiştir. MP; % -94.1 [F de NS için P xP ] ile % 87.3 8 2 5 3 [Fi'de NG için (Pı xP ]; HP ise % -85.6 [F 'deNG için Pı xP ] ile % 185.6 [FI'de NS için P xP ] arasında; 3 6 2 O 8 7 8 çoğunlukla SL ve PH'de ortaya çıkmış; ancak, en yüksek değerler NS ile NSP'nin F! ve F 'nde saptanmış; 2 yarı yabaniler ise P >P >P >P şeklinde sıralanmışlardır. NG dışındaki diğer özelliklerle (MP-Fı) arasında 8 6 3 2 istatistiksel olarak önemli korelasyonlar saptanmış; SL ve PH'nın daha avantajlı ve kararlı olduğu izlenimi edinilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUKAN, H. (2007). Kültür buğdayı (Triticum spp.) x yarı yabani buğday melezlemesinde heterosis üzerine bir araştırma. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 113–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/364668

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. References Agnus, J.W. 1997. Hybrid Wheat—A Dream or Reality ?. Aspects Appl. Biol. 50:15-22.
  2. Amaya A. A., R.H. Bush and K.L. Lebsock, 1972. Estimates of Genetic Effects of Heading Date Plant Height and Grain Yield in Durum Wheat. Crop ScL, 12:478-481. Anonymous, 1999. Soil Analysis Report. Department of Soil Science Laboratories, University of Ankara,
  3. Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara,
  4. Turkey. Bai N.R., Devika R., Regina, A. and Joseph, C.A. 1992 Correlation of Yield and Yield Components in Medium Duration Rice Cultivars. Environ. Ecol., 10:469-470.
  5. Bashir, A. 2002. Diallel Analysis of Yield and Yield Components in Triticum aestivum (1.) Em. Thell. Ph.D Thesis, India Agriculture University, 289 pp. Briggle, L.W. 1963.
  6. Heterosis in Wheat-A Review, Crop Sci., 3:407-412.
  7. Briggle, L.W., H.D. Petersen and R.M. Hayes, 1967. Performance of a Winter Wheat Hybrid, F2, F3 and Parent Varieties at Five Population Levels. Crop Sci., 7:485-490.
  8. Brown, CM., O.R. Weiber, and R.D. Seif, R.D, 1966. Heterosis and Combining Ability in Bread Winter Wheat. Crop Sci., 6, 382-400.
  9. Chakraborty, S.K. and V. Tiwari, 1995. Heterosis in Bread Wheat. J. Res. Bisra Agric. Univ. 7:109- 111. Cox, T,S, and J.P. Murphy, 1990. The Effect of Parental Divergence oh F2 Heterosis in Winter Wheat Crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet., 79:241- 250. Cregan, P. B and Bush, R. H. 1992. Heterosis. Inbreeding and Line Performance in Crosses Adapted Spring Wheats, Crop Sci., 18: 247-251.Dreisigacker, S., A.E. Melchmger, P. Zhang, K. Ammar, C. Flachenecker, D. Hoisington and M.L. Warburton, 2005. Hybrid performance and heterosis in spring bread wheat, and their relations to SSR-based genetic distances and coefficients of parentage. Euphytica, 144:51-59.
  10. Duncan, B.D. 1955. Duncan's Multiple Range and Multiple F-Test. Biometrics, 11:1-42.
  11. Fonseca, A. and F.L. Patterson, 1968. Hybrid Vigor in Seven-Parent Diallel Cross in Winter Wheat (T. aestivum L.) Crop Sci., 2:85-88.
  12. Garcia, P., M.I. Morris, M.L.E. Saenz de., R.W. Allard., M. Perra de la Vega and G. Ladizinsky, 1991. Genetic Diversity and Adaptedness in Tetraploid Avena barbata and Its Diploid Ancestors Avena hirtula and Avena westii, Proc. of the Nat. Acad. of Sci. of USA, 1207-1211.
  13. Güler, M. and MÖzgen, 1994. Relationship Between Winter Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) Parents and Hybrids for Some Morphological and Agronomical Traits. Tr. J. Agric. and Forestry, 18:229-233.
  14. Gyawali, K.K., CO. Qualset and W.W. Yamazaki, 1968. Estimates of Heterosis and Comb