Journals / TİSK Akademi / 2011 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 12

The gross receipts tax: An alternative approach to business taxation and evaluating its applications in US states

İşletmelerin vergilendirilmesinde alternatif bir yaklaşım:Brüt hasıla ergisi (GRT) ve ABD eyaletlerindeki uygulaması

Pages
161–182
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore the purpose of the study is to examine the advantages and disadvantages of GRT to US states and cause a discussion for Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the beginning of the Great Depression in 1929, US states sustained extraordinary change and policy makers shortly turned to gross receipts taxes as emergency revenue sources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Some of economists think that GRT is one important income source of twenty century while the others (especially corporate sector) support the elimination of GRT, because of its pyramiding effects.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore the purpose of the study is to examine the advantages and disadvantages of GRT to US states and cause a discussion for Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

With the beginning of the Great Depression in 1929, US states sustained extraordinary change and policy makers shortly turned to gross receipts taxes as emergency revenue sources. After several decades of stagnation, gross receipts taxes are again rising in popularity because of the similar reasons. The main characteristic of GRT, sometimes wrongly also named as retail sale tax, is to tax not only sales towards customers but intermediate and raw material sales. Some of economists think that GRT is one important income source of twenty century while the others (especially corporate sector) support the elimination of GRT, because of its pyramiding effects. Therefore the purpose of the study is to examine the advantages and disadvantages of GRT to US states and cause a discussion for Turkey.

Özet

Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nde ilk olarak Büyük Buhran döneminde acil gelir ihtiyacını karşılamak için uygulamaya konulan GRT'ler, günümüzde benzer gerekçelerle yeniden ilgi görmeye başlamıştır. Genellikle perakende satış vergisi ile karıştırılan GRT'nin temel özelliği sadece tüketicilere yapılan nihai satışları değil, işletmeden işletmeye ara inal, ham madde ve malzeme satışları dahil, bütün işlemleri vergilendirrnesidir. Bir kısım görüş GRT'yi yirminci yüz yılın ikinci yarısının en önemli gelir kaynaklarından biri olarak görürken, tam tersine ağırlıklı görüş (özellikle de işletme örgütleri) bu verginin kaldırılması gerektiği, ciddi ekonomik zararlar doğuracağı yönündedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Amerikan eyaletleri ile sınırlı olarak GRT'nin olumlu ve olumsuz yönlerini ortaya koymak ve Türkiye açısından yeni bir tartışma başlatmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİKKAYA, A. (2011). The gross receipts tax: An alternative approach to business taxation and evaluating its applications in US states. TİSK Akademi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 12, 161–182. https://ajindex.com/articles/364585

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Anklam, R. L. (2010). Pyramiding in the New Mexico Gross Receipts Tax. August 23. 14 Nisan 2011 tarihinde www.nmacc.net/RSTPC/RSTP_08-23-10-Pyramiding_NMGRT.pdf adresinden erişildi. Bird, R. M. (2009). Local Business Taxes in Developing Countries, 25 February. 28 Mart 2011 tarihinde www.ifc.org/.Raising Taxes Through Regulation./Local Business Taxes in Developing Countri-es_Bird.pdf (28/03/2011) adresinden erişildi. Bird, R. M. ve Bahl, R. (2008). Subnational Taxes in Developing Countries: The Way Forward. IIB Paper. No. 16, 1-36.
  2. Bird, R. M. (2005).
  3. A Look at Local Business Taxes, Special Report / Viewpoint. State Tax Notes. May 30, 685-698.
  4. Bird, R. M. ve Kenneth J. M. (2001). Taxing Business: A Provincial Affair? C.D. Howe Institute. No. 154, 1-32.
  5. Chamberlain, A. ve Patrick, F. (2006). Tax Pyramiding: The Economic Consequences of Gross Receipts Taxes. Tax Foundation Special Report. No: 147, 1-12.
  6. Collins, J. T. (2010). Florida Gross Receipts Tax. Journal of State Taxation. January-February 2010, 52-62. Commercial Activity Tax (CAT), General Information. 07 Nisan 2011 tarihinde http://tax.ohio.gov/divisions/commerci-al_activities/index.stm adresinden erişildi. Center for Tax and Budget Accountability CTBA (2007). Gross Receipts Tax, 2007. 15 Nisan 2011 tarihinde www.ctbaonli-ne.org/./Fact_Sheet_GrossReceipts_3 -2007.pdf adresinden erişildi. Çelikkaya, A. (2011). Avrupa Birliğinde Kurumlar Vergisini Uyumlaştırma Çabaları: Konsolide Kurumlar Vergisi Matrahı (CCCTB) Önerisi. Vergi Dünyası Dergisi. 30(354), 133-142.
  7. Edizdoğan, N. ve Çelikkaya, A. (2010). Vergilerin Ekonomik Analizi. Dora Yayıncılık, Bursa. Fournaris, E. G. (2010), Delaware's Business and Occupation Tax. Journal of State Taxation. January-February 2010, 35-38.
  8. Fox, W. F., Luna, L. ve Murray, M. N. (2007). Emerging State Business Tax Policy: More of the Same of Fundamental Change? 08 Nisan 2011 tarihinde www.taxpolicycenter.org/newse-vents/./Fox_Luna_Murray.pdf adresinden erişildi. Gall, M B. ve Kulwicki, L. A. (2006). Critique of the Nexus Standard for Ohio's New Commercial Activity Tax. Journal of State Taxation. March 1, 2006.
  9. Gessing, P. J. ve Harry, M. (2007). New Mexico's Harmful Gross Receipts Tax: A Warning to Other States. 12 Nisan 2011 tarihinde www.heartland.org/custom/semod_policybot/pdf/20802.pdf adresinden erişildi. Goodman, D. (2010). What Is the New Mexico Gross Receipts Tax? Journal of State Taxation. May-June, 41-42. Gross Receipts Tax. 14 Nisan 2011 tarihinde http