SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Üç Tritikale ÇeGidinde Verim ve Verim Komponentleri Gçin Kuraklığa Dayanım Gndekslerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Evaluation of Drought Resistance Indicates for Yield and Its Components in Three Triticale Cultivars

I. KUTLU
G. KİNACİ
Pages
95–104
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This cultivar may be utilized for improvement of drought resistance in triticale breeding programmes

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Drought is a wide-spread problem seriously influencing cereal production and quality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was carried to examine differences in yield and yield components and kernel features among triticale cultivars (Tatlicak 97, Karma 2000 and MIKHAM 2002) under drought stress.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This cultivar may be utilized for improvement of drought resistance in triticale breeding programmes
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Drought is a wide-spread problem seriously influencing cereal production and quality. The development of triticale cultivars which are tolerant to drought is an objective in many breeding programmes, but so far success has been limited. This study was carried to examine differences in yield and yield components and kernel features among triticale cultivars (Tatlicak 97, Karma 2000 and MIKHAM 2002) under drought stress. Three triticale cultivars with different yield performance were grown in separate experiments under the rain fed and irrigated conditions at Eskisehir, Turkey, in 2006-2007 growing season. In the study, susceptibility index (SSI), stress tolerance index (STI), tolerance (TOL), yield index (YI), yield stability index (YSI), mean productivity (MP) and geometric mean productivity (GMP) were calculated. The best yielding cultivar under the drought stress, hence having a low susceptibility index, was Karma 2000. This cultivar may be utilized for improvement of drought resistance in triticale breeding programmes

Özet

tritikale çeşitlerinin geliştirilmesi pek çok ıslah programının amacıdır fakat bugüne kadarki başarı sınırlı kalmıştır. Bu çalışma, kuraklık stresi altında verim, verim ögeleri ve tane özellikleri bakımından tritikale çeşitleri (Tatlicak 97, Karma 2000 and MIKHAM 2002) arasındaki farklılıkları incelemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Verim performansları farklı üç tritikale çeşidi 2006-2007 üretim sezonunda, Eskişehir, Türkiye"de sulu ve kuru koşullar altında farklı denemelerde yetiştirilmiştir. Çalışmada, stres duyarlılık indeksi (SSI), stres tolerans indeksi (STI), tolerans (TOL), verim indeksi (YI), verim stabilite indeksi (YSI), ortalama verimlilik (MP) ve geometrik ortalama verimlilik (GMP) indeksleri hesaplanmıştır. Kuraklık stresi altında en iyi verime sahip olan çeşit, en düşük duyarlılık indeksine sahip olmasına karşılık Karma 2000"dir. Bu çeşit, tritikalede kuraklığa dayanımı geliştirmek için ıslah programlarında kullanılabilir

🔖

Cite This Article

KUTLU, I., KİNACİ, G. (2010). Üç Tritikale ÇeGidinde Verim ve Verim Komponentleri Gçin Kuraklığa Dayanım Gndekslerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 95–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/364482

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Austin, R. B. 1989. Maximizing crop production in water- limited environments, In: Drought resistance in cereals. Baker, F. W. G. (Ed), Published for ICSU Press by C. A. B. International, pp.13-20.
  2. Bagci, S. A., M. Keser, S. Taner and T. Tasyurek, 2004.
  3. Triticale in Turkey, Triticale improvement and production, FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper, pp.149-154.
  4. Berry, J. and O. Bjorkman, 1980. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Ann. Rev. plant Physiol, 31: 491-532.
  5. Bhullar, S.S., and C.F. Jenner. 1986. Effects of temperature on the conversion of sucrose to starch in the developing wheat endosperm. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13:605-615.
  6. Blum, A., H. Poiarkova, G. Golan and J. Mayer, 1983a. Chemical desiccation of wheat plants as a simulator of post-anthesis stress I. Effects on translocation and kernel growth. Field Crops Res., 6:51-58.
  7. Blum, A., J. Mayer and G. Golan, 1983b. Chemical desiccation of wheat plants as a simulator of postanthesis stress II. Relations to drought stress. Field Crops Res., 6:149-155. Blum A., 1986. The effect of heat stress on wheat leaf and ear photosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 37: 111-118.
  8. Bouslama, M. and W.T. Schapaugh, 1984. Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance, Crop Sci., 24: 933-937.
  9. Bruckner, P.L. and R.C. Frohberg, 1987. Stress tolerance and adaptation in spring wheat, Crop Sci., 27: 31-36.
  10. Ceccarelli, S. and S. Grando, 1996. Drought as a challenge for the plant breeder. Plant Growth Regulation, 20:149-155.
  11. Clarke, J.M., T.M. Towenley-Smith, T.N. Mccaig and D.G. Green, 1984. Growth analysis of spring wheat cultivars of varying drought resistance, Crop Sci., 24: 537-541.
  12. Clarke, J.M., R.M. De Pauw and T.M. TownleySmith, 1992. Evaluation of methods for quantification of drought tolerance in wheat, Crop Sci., 32: 728-732.
  13. Davidson, J. L. and J. W. Birch, 1978. Response of standard Australian and Mexican wheat to temperature and water stress, Aust. J. Agric. Res., 29:1091-1106.
  14. Day, A.D. and S. Intalop, 1970. Some effects of soil moisture on the growth of wheat. Apron J., 62: 27- 29. Denmead, O. T. and B. D. Millar, 1976. Field studies of the conductance of wheat leaves and transpiration, Agron J., 68: 307-311.
  15. Fernandez, G.C. J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing stress tolerance. In: C.G. Kuo, Editor, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature