Journals / Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Future of Fig Product in Turkey

Türkiye'de İncir Üretiminin Geleceği

Pages
138–146
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results obtained from this study will help to producers, policy makers and consumers in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to predict the future of figs product taking into account twenty-four years of fig production in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Figs are a very important product in Turkey's foreign trade. 23% of the world’s fig productions are provided by Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results obtained from this study will help to producers, policy makers and consumers in Turkey.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:ARIMA · Ficus carica · İncir

Abstract

The aim of this study is to predict the future of figs product taking into account twenty-four years of fig production in Turkey. Figs are a very important product in Turkey's foreign trade. 23% of the world’s fig productions are provided by Turkey. In 60 of the 81 provinces in Turkey is done fig production. The total fig production’s approximately 86% is getting five provinces in Turkey. These provinces are Aydin, Izmir, Bursa, Mersin and Hatay respectively. ARIMA model used to forecast of fig production quantity during the period 2015 to 2023 in Turkey. According to findings of this study, it is forecasted that Turkey’s fig production will decrease during the period 2015 to 2023. The results obtained from this study will help to producers, policy makers and consumers in Turkey.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı 24 yıllık veriler dikkate alınarak Türkiye'de incir üretiminin gelecek yıllardaki tahmininin belirlenmesidir. İncir üretimi Türkiye'nin dış ticaretinde önemli bir yere sahiptir. Türkiye Dünya incir üretiminin %23'ünü karşılamaktadır. Türkiye'nin 81 ilinin 60'ında incir üretimi yapılmaktadır. Türkiye’de incir üretiminin %86'sı 5 il tarafından karşılanmaktadır. Bu iller Aydın, İzmir, Bursa, Mersin ve Hatay'dır. Türkiye'de 2015-2023 arasında incir üretiminin tahminini belirlemede ARİMA modeli kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlara göre Türkiye'de incir üretimi gelecekte azalacaktır. Bu çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlar politika yapıcılarına yön verecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUNDUMLU, A. S., ÖKSÜZ, M. E., KURTOĞLU, S. (2018). Future of Fig Product in Turkey. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 138–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/364400

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abdullah L (2012). ARIMA model for gold bullion coin selling prices forecasting. IJAAS 1(4): 153-158. Anonymous (2015a). The ARIMA Models. Retrieved in February, 07, 2015 from Anonymous (2015b). Dry Fig Annual Report, 2013. Customs and Trade Ministry. General Directorate of Cooperatives in February, 2014. Anonymous (2015c). Aegean Dried Fruits and Products Exporters' Union. Retrieved in February, 05, 2015 from Bal E (2012). Effect of postharvest UV-C treatments on quality attributes of fresh fig. Bulgarian J Agric Sci 18(2): 191-196.
  2. Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1970). Statistical Models for Forecasting and Control. Holden Day, San Francisco. Bulbul S Atil H & Hepaksoy S (1997). A general study of commercial dried fig production in the Big Meander Valley of Turkey. In I International Symposium on Fig 480: 317-320.
  3. Cobanoglu F, Kocatas H, Ozen M, Tutmuş E & Konak R (2007). An evaluation of approach in determination of climate factors impact on dried fig exportation in Turkey J Fac Agric OMU, 22(1): 11-19.
  4. Eriten A (2005). Estimates of demand relationships for figs and figs products in Turkey. Middle East Technical University, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Master Thesis, Ankara.
  5. FAO (2015). Classifications and standarts. Retrieved in February, 05, 2015 from Finley JW (2005). Proposed criteria for assessing the efficacy of cancer reduction by plant foods enriched in carotenoids, glucosinolates, polyphenols and seleno compounds. Annals of Botany 95(7): 1075-1096.
  6. Flaishman MA, Rover V & Stover E (2008). The fig: botany, horticulture and breeding. Hort Rev 34: 113-197.
  7. Hiwale S (2015). Fig (Ficus carica). In Sustainable Horticulture in Semiarid Dry Lands. Springer India p 159-175.
  8. ITC (2015). Trade of fig. Retrieved in February, 05, 2015 from Joseph B & Raj SJ (2011). Pharmacognostic and phytochemical properties of Ficus carica Linn–An overview. Int J PharmTech Res 3(1): 8-12.
  9. Kocatas H (2014). Determination of the effects of chilling periods of some fig cultivars and hydrogen cyanamide (H2CN2). treatment on earliness. Adnan Menderes University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Master Thesis, Aydin, Turkey. Moharrampour M, Sohrabi S & Vakili J (2013). Comparison of Support Vector Machines (SVM). and Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA). in daily flow forecasting. SCIJOUR 1(1): 1-10. Mombeini H & Yazdani-Chamzini A (2014). Developing a new approach for forecasting the trends of oil price. BMR 4 (3): 120-132.
  10. Patil Vikas V, Bhangale S C &