Journals / Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Sayı: 0

Preliminary Checking of Some Turkish Diatomaceous Earth Similarities with Commercial Diatomaceous Earths under Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)

Pages
13–19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Local DE coded as DC has a round shape and looks similar to commercial DE of Pyrisec while local DE coded as CAN has triangle shape and its shape was different from those of all other DE samples.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Diatoms are dead bodies of unicellular algae's and made up of fossilized diatoms in aquatic ecosystems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In present study, image properties of 10 different Turkish DE samples under Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) were checked and compared similarities with commercial DEs, namely Protector,SilicoSec, Insecto and Pyrisec.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Local DE coded as DC has a round shape and looks similar to commercial DE of Pyrisec while local DE coded as CAN has triangle shape and its shape was different from those of all other DE samples.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Diatoms are dead bodies of unicellular algae's and made up of fossilized diatoms in aquatic ecosystems. Diatomaceous earth (DE) is a dust varying in color depending on composition, from white-grey to yellow to red and active ingredient is amorphous silicon dioxide. DEs are commonly used for purification of water, the purification of juices, separation of various oils and chemicals and also used as an insecticide. Mode of action as insecticide which damage occurs to the insects protective wax coat on the cuticle, mostly by sorption and to a lesser degree by abrasion, or both. The result is the loss of water from the insect's body through desiccation resulting in death. The efficacy of DE against insects depends on different physical and morphological characteristics of the diatoms. In present study, image properties of 10 different Turkish DE samples under Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) were checked and compared similarities with commercial DEs, namely Protector,SilicoSec, Insecto and Pyrisec. SEM image analysis indicated that there were variations in shape and size of dead bodies of diatoms in Turkish and commercial DEs. The shapes of dead bodies of diatoms in Turkish local DE's named as CBN and BGN were found very similar with those in commercial DE, Silicosec. Local DE coded as DC has a round shape and looks similar to commercial DE of Pyrisec while local DE coded as CAN has triangle shape and its shape was different from those of all other DE samples.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞLAM, Ö., IŞIKBER, A. A., TUNAZ, H., ER, M. K., BAHADIR, F., ŞEN, R. (2017). Preliminary Checking of Some Turkish Diatomaceous Earth Similarities with Commercial Diatomaceous Earths under Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 0, 13–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/364365

References (12)

  1. Anonymous, 2017a. Diatomite Mining and Processing,http://diatomite.org/DiatomiteMining-and-Processing.IDPA, International diatomite producers association. (Accessed date: 05.05.2017). Anonymous, 2017b. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scanningelectro nmicroscope (Accessed date: 05.05.2017).
  2. Athanassiou, C.G., B.J. Vayias, C.B. Dimizas, N.G. Kavallieratos, A.S. Papagregoriou and C.Th. Buchelos, 2005. Insecticidal efficacy of diatomaceous earth against Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Tribolium confusum du Val (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) on stored wheat: influence of dose rate, temperature and exposure interval. Journal of Stored Products Research,: 41- 47. Athanassiou, C.G., N.G. Kavallieratos, B.J. Vayias, Z. TomanoviC, A. Petrovic, V. Rozman, C. Adler, Z. Korunic and D. Milovanovic, 2011. Laboratory evaluation of diatomaceous earth deposits mined from several locations in central and southeastern Europe as potential protectants against coleopteran grain pests. Crop protection 30: 329-339.
  3. Bhishma, R.S., S.H. Alavi, S.P. Harimkar, M. McCollum, J.F. Donoghue and F.D. Blum, 2017. Particle morphology dependent superhydrophobicity in treated diatomaceous earth/ polystyrene coatings, Applied Surface Science 416:947-956.
  4. Calvert, R. 1930. Diatomaceous earth Journal of Chemical Education, 7: 28-29.
  5. Çetin, M. and B. Taş, 2012. Biyolojik orjinli tek mineral: Diyatomit. Türk Bilim Araştırma Vakfı (TÜBAV) Bilim Dergisi, 5(2): 28-46.
  6. Parkinson, J. and R. Gordon, 1999. Beyond micromachining: the potential of diatoms. Trends Biotechnology, 17:190-196.
  7. Round, F., R. Crawford and D. Mann, 1990. The Diatoms: Biology and Morphology of the Genera, Cambridge University Press,
  8. UK. Katz, H. 1991. Desiccants: dry as dust means insect's death. Pest Control Technology, 82-84.
  9. Korunic, Z., P.G. Fields, M.I.P. Kovacs, J.S. Noll, O.M. Lukow, C.J. Demianyk and K.J. Shibley, 1996. The effect of diatomaceous earth on grain quality. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 9(3): 373-387.
  10. Korunic, Z. 1997. Rapid assessment of the insecticidal value of diatomaceous earths without conducting bioassays. Journal of Stored Products Research, 33, 219-229.
  11. Korunic, Z. 1998. Diatomaceous earths, a group of natural insecticides. Journal of Stored Products Research, 34: 87-97.
  12. Doğanay, İ.Ş., A.A. Işıkber, Ö. Sağlam and Y. Bilgili, 2014. Efficiency of some Turkish diatomaceous earth deposits against stored-grain insects, Sitophilus granarius (L.) a