Journals / Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Determination of Residual Toxicity of Spinetoram Against Cowpea Weevil, (Callasobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchninae)

Spinetoram’ın Börülce Tohum Böceği, Callasobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchninae)’a Karşı Rezidüel Toksisitesinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
133–143
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, this bioassay showed potential ability to use of Spinetoram treatment as a solution on stored products against major stored leguminocae pest C. maculatus was revealed and to be an alternative for conventional synthetic insecticides.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the present study, determination of residual toxicity of Spinetoram solution efficacy was evaluated on chickpeas against adult of Callasobruchus maculatus (F.) under laboratory condition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In laboratory bioassay, C. maculatus adults on chickpeas were exposed to Spinetoram 6, 12, 24, 48 and 60 ppm (mg active substance/l water) concentrations during 1,3,5 and 7 days. %100 paralyze and mortality rate of C. maculatus adults were recorded on surface treated chickpeas by Spinetoram at 48 ppm day of 5 and above concentration (60 ppm) day of 3.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, this bioassay showed potential ability to use of Spinetoram treatment as a solution on stored products against major stored leguminocae pest C. maculatus was revealed and to be an alternative for conventional synthetic insecticides.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the present study, determination of residual toxicity of Spinetoram solution efficacy was evaluated on chickpeas against adult of Callasobruchus maculatus (F.) under laboratory condition. In laboratory bioassay, C. maculatus adults on chickpeas were exposed to Spinetoram 6, 12, 24, 48 and 60 ppm (mg active substance/l water) concentrations during 1,3,5 and 7 days. %100 paralyze and mortality rate of C. maculatus adults were recorded on surface treated chickpeas by Spinetoram at 48 ppm day of 5 and above concentration (60 ppm) day of 3. Spinetoram LC50, LC90, LC99 values of C. maculatus adults 3.177, 45.230, 79.514 ppm were recorded respectively. At Spinetoram concentrations of 48 and 60 ppm progeny production was less than 3 and 1 adult respectively while at 6, 12 and 24 ppm concentrations progeny production was 29, 13 and 5 adults. In conclusion, this bioassay showed potential ability to use of Spinetoram treatment as a solution on stored products against major stored leguminocae pest C. maculatus was revealed and to be an alternative for conventional synthetic insecticides.

Özet

Mevcut çalışmada laboratuar koşullarında Spinetoram’ın solüsyon halinde nohut üzerinde Callasobruchus maculatus (F.) erginlerine karşı rezidüel toksisitesi araştırılmıştır. Bu kapsamda C. maculatus erginlerine karşı 1,3,5 ve 7 gün süreyle nohut üzerinde solüsyon halde Spinetoram’ın 6, 12, 24, 48 ve 60 ppm (mg aktif madde/l su) konsantrasyonlarında biyolojik testler yürütülmüştür. Nohut yüzeyine solüsyon halde püskürtülen Spinetoram’ın 48 ppm konsantrasyonda 5. günde ve yüksek konsantrasyonda (60 ppm) 3. günde C. maculatus erginlerinin hemen hemen %100’ ünün felç olduğu yada öldüğü görülmüştür Spinetoram’ın C. maculatus erginlerine karşı LC50, LC90, LC99 değerleri sırasıyla 3.177, 45.230, 79.514 ppm bulunmuştur. Spinetoram’ın 48 ve 60 ppm konsantrasyonlarında nesil ergin çıkışları sırasıyla 3 ve 1 bireyin altında kalmışken 6, 12 ve 24 ppm konsantrasyonlarda ise yeni nesil ergin çıkışları 29, 13 ve 5 birey bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak bu çalışma Spinetoram insektisitinin ürüne solüsyon halde uygulamasının depolanmış baklagillerde sorun olan C. maculatus mücadelesinde kullanılabilme potansiyelini ortaya çıkarmış ve konvensiyonel sentetik insektisitlere alternatif olabileceğini göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SULAR, M., SAĞLAM, Ö., IŞIKBER, A. A. (2019). Determination of Residual Toxicity of Spinetoram Against Cowpea Weevil, (Callasobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchninae). Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 133–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/364357

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Adak, M.S., M. Güler ve N. Kayan, 2010. Yemeklik Dane Baklagiller Üretiminin Artırılması Olanakları. VII. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisligi Teknik Kongresi, Ankara. s: 329-41.
  2. Akdağ, C., 2001. Tokat’ta Yüksek Verim Sağlayacak Nohut Çesitleri ile Ekim Zamanlarının Belirlenmesi. GOÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No: 59, Araştırma Serisi No: 19, Tokat. Akova, Y., 2010. Bakliyat. T.C. Başbakanlık Dış Ticaret Müşteşarlığı İhracatı Geliştirme Etüt Merkezi Raporu. 12s. Athiè, I., Gomes, R.A.R., Bolonhezi, S., Valentini, S.R.T. and M.F.P. De Castro, 1998. Effects of carbon dioxide and phosphine mixtures on resistant populations of stored-grain insects. Journal of Stored Products Research.34: 27-32. Baier H. and B.D. Webster, 1992. Control of Acanthocelides obtectus Say (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in Phaseolus vulgaris L. seed stored on small farms- II. Germination and cooking time, Journal of Stored Product Research, 28: 295-298.
  3. Bell, C.H. and S.M. Wilson, 1995. Phosphine tolerance and resistance in Trogoderma granarium Everts. (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). Journal of Stored Products Research. 31: 199-205.
  4. Besard, L., V. Mommaerts, G. Abdu-Alla And G. Smagghe, 2011. Lethal and sublethal side-effect assessment supports a more benign profile of spinetoram compared with spinosad in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Pest Management Science 67, 541-547.
  5. Boxall, R.A. 2001. Post-harvest losses to insect-a world overview. International Biodeterioration&Biodegradation Vol. 48, pp. 137-152.
  6. Chaudry, M.Q., 1996. A review of the mechanisms involved in the action of phosphine as an insecticide and phosphine resistance in storedproduct insect. Pesticide Science. 49: 213-228. Dow AgroScience, 2014. Product safety assesment: Spinoteram Form No. 233-00382-MM-1014X,pp. 1-3. Dow AgroScience, 2015. Radiant 120 SC onaylı ürün etiketi, 1s. http://www.dowagro.com/tr-tr/turkiye/products/%C4%B0nsektisitler/radiant120-sc (erişim tarihi, 10.01.2018).
  7. Dripps J, B. Olson, T. Sparks and G. Crouse, 2008. Spinetoram: how artificial intelligence combined natural fermentation with synthetic chemistry to produce a new spinosyn insecticide. Plant Health Progress. https://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/php/ perspective/2008/spinetoram/, (erişim tarihi, 10.01.2018).
  8. Dripps J.E., R.E. Boucher, A. Chloridis, C.B. Cleveland, C.V. De Amicis, L.E. Gomez, D.L. Paroonagian, L.A. Pavan,T.C. Sparks and G.B. Watson, 2011. The spinosyn insecticides. In: Lopez, O., Fernandez-Bolanos, J.G. (Eds.), Green Trends in Insect Contr