Journals / Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Sayı: 0

Seasonal Variation of the Nutrient Contents of Sarcopoterium spinosum (L.) Spach

Pages
91–98
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, supplementary feed should be given to the animals grazing in these areas for overcoming their poor performances.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The research was conducted to find out the feeding potential of Sarcopoterium spinosum (L.) Spach, commonly found in Mediterranean climate dominated areas and also have an important place in rangeland livestock farming as well as in erosion of these areas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was carried out in Yıldız Koyu of Gökçeada Island in 2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, supplementary feed should be given to the animals grazing in these areas for overcoming their poor performances.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The research was conducted to find out the feeding potential of Sarcopoterium spinosum (L.) Spach, commonly found in Mediterranean climate dominated areas and also have an important place in rangeland livestock farming as well as in erosion of these areas. The study was carried out in Yıldız Koyu of Gökçeada Island in 2013. The nutrient contents of plant were determined seasonally (winter, summer, spring and fall) as well as in different organs (stalk and leaf) of the plant. Total of 10 plants were taken during each sampling period. Only the crude protein and ADF contents of plant leaf had found statistically important in terms of season, but there were not any significant importance in respect to other characteristics of the plant. The leaf and stalk ratios were changed between 37.57% (fall)-42.38% (winter) and 57.62% (winter)-62.49% (fall), respectively. Highest leaf/stalk ratio (0.74) has been observed in winter while the least (0.60) in fall. Average crude protein (6.39%), ash (9.66%) and fat (6.33-7.60%) of leaves were found more as compared to the crude protein (3.81%), ash (4.95%) and fat (4.37-5.80%) of stalk. On the other hand, NDF (36.19-43.41%), ADF (22.31-27.54%) and ADL (9.50-13.35%) of leaves were found less as compared to stalks. Consequently, Sarcopoterium spinosum has an importance in terms of soil protection and shrub formation into the degraded parts of Mediterranean flora, also found as a feed source for animals. However, supplementary feed should be given to the animals grazing in these areas for overcoming their poor performances.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKKUŞ, A., ALATÜRK, F., ALİ, B., ÇOBAN, V. (2017). Seasonal Variation of the Nutrient Contents of Sarcopoterium spinosum (L.) Spach. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 0, 91–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/364305

References (9)

  1. Alphan, H. 2006. Ekosistem dinamiklerinin izlenmesine bir araç olarak peyzaj değişimlerinin analizi. Ekoloji, 58: 8-15. Anonim, 2014. Türkiye bitkileri veri serisi. http://turkherb.ibu.edu.tr/index. AOAC, 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th Edition,
  2. Association of Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. Atalay, I. 1994. Türkiye Vejetasyon Coğrafyası. Ege Üni. Basımevi, İzmir, s, 195. Atalay, I., A. Semenderoğlu, H. Çukur and N. Gümüş, 2003. Driving forces of rangeland degradation in Turkey. The RICAMARE Workshop on Land Use Changes and Cover and Water Resources in the Mediterranean Region, 17 Feb., Toulouse, France, pp 8. Bakır, Ö. 1987. Çayır Mera Amenajmanı. Ankara Üni. Ziraat Fak. Yay.: 992, Ders Kitabı: 292, 362 s. Baytekin, H., İ. Y. Yurtman and T. Savaş, 2005. Süt keçiciliğinde kaba yem üretim organizasyonu. Süt Keçiciliği Ulusal Kongresi, 26-27 Mayıs 2005,
  3. İzmir.
  4. Bremner, J.M. 1960. Determination of nitrogen in soil by Kjeldahl method. J. Agri. Sci. 55: 11-33.
  5. Cengiz, T., H. Özcan, H. Baytekin, Ü. Altınoluk, A. Kelkit, F. Özkök, C. Akbulak and A.Ç. Kaptan, 2009. Gökçeada Arazi Kullanım Planlaması. TÜBİTAK ÇAYDAĞ Hızlı Destek Projesi (Proje No: 107Y337) Sonuç Raporu, s 146. Davis, P.H. 1972. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Uni. of Edinburg Press, Vol. 4. Diamantopulos, J., S.A. Pirintsos, N.S. Margaris and G.P. Stamou, 1994. Variation in Greek phrygana vegetation in relation to soil and climate. J. Vegetation Sci., 5: 355-360.
  6. Gökkuş, A., A. Özaslan Parlak, H. Hakyemez, H. Baytekin and M. Parlak, 2009. Maki örtüsünde yer alan bitki türlerinin botanik özellikleri ile besleme değerlerindeki değişimin belirlenmesi. TÜBİTAK Proje No: 106O458, Sonuç Raporu, 147 s. Henkin, Z. and N.G. Seligman, 2011. The role of management on the rate of secondary succession in Mediterranean shrubland after fire. Plant Biosystems, 145(3): 708-714.
  7. Kababya, D., A. Perevolotsky, I. Bruckental and S. Landau, 1997. Nutritional potential of woody vegetation for local goats in Israel, In: Recent Advances in Small Ruminant Nutrition (Eds; Lindberg J.E., Gonda H.L., Ledin I.), Options Méditerranéennes: Série A, Séminaires Méditerranéens, n. 34, 47-52.
  8. Kaya, B. and C. Aladağ, 2009. Maki ve garig topluluklarının Türkiye'deki yayılış alanları ve ekolojik özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Selçuk Üni. Sosyal Bil. Enst. Dergisi, 22: 67-80.
  9. Lanteri, A., A. Guglielmo, P. Pavone and C. Salmeri, 2012. Seed germination in Sarcopoterium spinosum (L.) Spach from South-Eastern S