Journals / Tanısal ve Girişimsel Radyoloji (Yeni Adı: Dİagnostic & Intervent. Radiol) / 2003 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

HRCT findings in congenital aural atresia

Doğumsal aural atrezide YRBT bulguları

Pages
47–53
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: High resolution computed tomography is an effective method for the evaluation of the anomalies of the external, middle and inner ear in patients with congenital aural atresia and for planning the surgical treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE: To define high resolution computed tomography findings in the external, middle and inner ear of patients with congenital aural atresia and to emphasize the importance of these findings in the preoperative evaluation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty one patients with congenital aural atresia (14 male, 7 female) aged between 1-30 years were evaluated with high resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: High resolution computed tomography is an effective method for the evaluation of the anomalies of the external, middle and inner ear in patients with congenital aural atresia and for planning the surgical treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kulak · orta · Temporal kemik

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define high resolution computed tomography findings in the external, middle and inner ear of patients with congenital aural atresia and to emphasize the importance of these findings in the preoperative evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty one patients with congenital aural atresia (14 male, 7 female) aged between 1-30 years were evaluated with high resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone. A Toshiba TCT-600 scanner was used in 11 cases, and a Xvision/GX scanner was used in 10 cases. Sections 1 mm thick were obtained in axial and coronal projections using high bone detail algorithms. Sagittal reformations were also made when necessary. RESULTS: Forty-two ears in 21 patients with congenital aural atresia were studied. These included 8 patients with high bilateral and 13 with unilateral congenital aural atresia in which 8 patients had right sided and 5 patients had left sided atresia. Stenosis of the external auditory canal was found in 11 ears, complete atresia was found in 13 ears, incomplete atresia was found in 1 ear. There was varied ossicular deformity in 18 ears. Anomalies of the stapes and oval window were found in 6 ears. An anteriorly located mastoid segment of the facial nerve canal was identified in 11 ears. An inferiorly located tympanic segment of the facial nerve canal was identified in 2 ears, and 3 ears had an abnormal posterior orientation of the mandibular condyles. Only 2 patients had associated inner ear deformity. CONCLUSION: High resolution computed tomography is an effective method for the evaluation of the anomalies of the external, middle and inner ear in patients with congenital aural atresia and for planning the surgical treatment.

Özet

AMAÇ Doğumsal aural atrezili olguların dış, orta ve iç kulağında yüksek rezolüsyonlu bilgisayarlı tomografi bulgularını tanımlamak ve operasyon öncesi değerlendirmede bu bulguların önemini vurgulamak. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM Doğumsal aural atrezili 21 olguda 42 kulak, temporal kemik yüksek rezolüsyonlu bilgisayarlı tomografi tetkiki ile incelendi. Kesitler 11 olguda Toshiba TCT-600 cihazı (kesit kalınlığı 1 mm, kesit aralığı 1 mm), 10 olguda Xvision/GX cihazı (kesit kalınlığı 1 mm, adım oranı 1) kullanılarak elde olundu. Tetkik kemik algoritmi parametreleri kullanılarak, 11 olguda aksiyel, 10 olguda aksiyel ve koronal kesitler alınarak yapıldı. BULGULAR Yaşları 1-31 yaş arasında değişen olguların on dördü erkek, yedisi bayandı. Sekiz olguda iki taraflı doğumsal aural atrezi vardı. Tek taraflı tutulum gösteren 13 olgunun sekizinde sağda, beşinde sol tarafta anomali saptandı. Onbir kulakta dış kulak yolu darlığı, 13 kulakta tam atrezi, 1 kulakta ise kısmi atrezi mevcuttu. Onsekiz kulakta kemikçik anomalisi saptandı, 6 kulakta stapes ve oval pencere anomalisi mevcuttu. Onbir kulakta fasiyal kanal mastoid segmentte öne, iki kulakta timpanik segmentte aşağıya yer değiştirme saptandı. Üç kulakta arka yerleşimli mandibüler kondil, iki kulakta iç kulak anomalisi izlendi. SONUÇ Doğumsal aural atrezili olgularda, yüksek rezolüsyonlu bilgisayarlı tomografi dış, orta ve iç kulak anomalilerinin tanımlanmasında ve cerrahi tedavinin planlanmasında etkin bir yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KEBAPÇI, M., KAYA, T., ADAPINAR, B., ÖZKAN, R. (2003). HRCT findings in congenital aural atresia. Tanısal ve Girişimsel Radyoloji (Yeni Adı: Dİagnostic & Intervent. Radiol), Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 47–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/364243

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Spring PM, Gianoli GJ. Congenital auralatresia. J La State Med Soc 1997; 149:6-9
  2. Jahrsdoerfer RA. Congenital atresia of theear. Laryngoscope 1978; 88:1-48
  3. Jafek BW, Nager GT, Strife J, Gayler RW.Congenital aural atresia: an analysis of 311cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1975;80:588-595
  4. Calzolari F, Garani G, Sensi A, Martini A.Clinical and radiological evaluation inchildren with microtia. Br J Audiol 1999;33:303-312
  5. Swartz JD, Harnsberger HR. Imaging ofthe Temporal Bone. 3rd ed. New York:Thieme, 1998; 16-47
  6. Mayer TE, Brueckmann H, Siegert R, WittA, Weerda H. High-resolution CT of thetemporal bone in dysplasia of the auricleand external auditory canal. AJNR 1997;18:53-65
  7. Lumbroso C, Sebag G, Argyropoulou M,Manach Y, Lallemand D. Preoperative X-ray computed tomographic evaluation ofmajor aplasia of the ear in children. J Radi-ol 1995; 76:185-189
  8. Jahrsdoerfer RA, Yeakley WJ, AguilarEA, Cole RR, Gray LC. Grading system for the selection of patients with congenitalaural atresia. Am J Otol 1992; 13:6-12
  9. Yeakley WJ, Jahrsdoerfer RA. CT evalu-ation of congenital aural atresia: what theradiologist and surgeon need to know. JComput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:724-731
  10. Diren HB. Temporal Kemik Radyolojsi.Ankara: Mine Ofset Ltd. Şti., 1996; 14-18
  11. Zeren Z. K›sa Sistematik İnsan Anatomisi.2. bask›. İstanbul: Çeliker Matbaas›, 1972;619-624
  12. Memiş A. Temporal Kemiğin Bilgisayarl›Tomografisi. 1. bask›. İzmir: Enkare Ltd.Şti., 1995; 81-83
  13. Weerda H. Classification of congenital de-formities of the auricle. Fac Plast Surg1988; 5:385-388
  14. Maskar Ü. Embriyoloji. 6. bask›. İstanbul:Sermet Matbaas›, 1982; 200-202
  15. Petorak İ. Medikal Embriyoloji. 2. bask›.İstanbul: Aykaç Matbaas›, 1984; 267-273
  16. Swartz JD, Wolfson RJ, Marlowe FI, et alExternal auditory canal dysplasia: CT eva-luation. Laryngoscope 1985; 95:841-845
  17. Swartz JD, Faeber EN. Congenital malfor-mations of the external and middle ear:high-resolution CT findings of surgical im-portance. AJR 1985; 144:501-506
  18. Chandrasekhar SS, De la Cruz A, GarridoE. Surgery of congenital aural atresia. AmJ Otol 1995; 16:713-717
  19. Tong-jia L, Juan G, Bao-sen L. CT evalu-ation of malformed external and middle earand its surgical correlation. Chinese Medi-cal Journal 1992; 105:490-493
  20. Kountakis SE, Helidonis E, JahrsdoerferRA. Microtia grade as an indicator ofmiddle ear development aural atresia. ArchOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:885-886
  21. Bellucci RJ. Conge