Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2017 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

A New Umbilicoplasty Technique for Forming an Umbilical Chalice with Key and Hole Pattern Flaps

Anahtar-kilit paternli fleplerle yeni bir umblikoplasti tekniği

Pages
76–81
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The incidence of the most frequent complications, such as scar contracture and umbilical stenosis, occurs less often in our safe and versatile technique

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The umbilicus is a significant component of the abdomen.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We present a technique that can avoid these complications while also fulfilling the aesthetic umbilicus criteria.Materials and Methods: Between 2011 and 2014, 18 female patients underwent both abdominoplasty and umbilicoplasty, which was performed using our technique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The incidence of the most frequent complications, such as scar contracture and umbilical stenosis, occurs less often in our safe and versatile technique
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The umbilicus is a significant component of the abdomen. The size, position, depth, and shape of the umbilicus, as well as the location of the scar, are very important. While various techniques have been described in order to obtain an aesthetically appealing umbilicus, surgeons still frequently encounter complications such as visible scars and scar contractures. We present a technique that can avoid these complications while also fulfilling the aesthetic umbilicus criteria.Materials and Methods: Between 2011 and 2014, 18 female patients underwent both abdominoplasty and umbilicoplasty, which was performed using our technique. During abdominoplasty, the umbilicus was separated from the abdominal skin as a three-armed star and inserted in a Y-shaped incision. The patients were asked to evaluate and rate their new umbilici in terms of shape, depth, location, and scaring.Results: The mean follow up period was 20 months. No umbilical complications, such as hypertrophic scarring, were observed. In general, 80% of the patients gave the procedure an 8-point rating out of a possible high of 10-point rating, indicating their satisfaction with the results. Conclusion: In this described technique, the umbilicus is small, shallow, and oval, and the scar is less visible. The incidence of the most frequent complications, such as scar contracture and umbilical stenosis, occurs less often in our safe and versatile technique

Özet

Amaç: Göbek deliği karın ön duvarının önemli bir parçasıdır. Abdominoplasti ameliyatlarında göbek deliğinin boyutu, pozisyonu, derinliği, ve şekli en az nedbenin yeri kadar önemlidir. Estetik olarak güzel göbek deliği elde etmek için birçok teknik tarif edilmiş olsa da, cerrahlar sıklıkla nedbenin görünmesi ve çekilme yapması gibi birçok problemle karşılaşmaktadır. Biz bu çalışmada bu tarz sorunları engellerken estetik göbek deliği kriterlerini karşılayan yeni bir umblicoplasti tekniğini sunduk.Gereç ve Yöntem: 2011 ve 2014 yılları arasında, 18 kadın hastanın sonuçları incelendi. Hastalara abdominoplasti ve aynı seansta umblikoplasti yapıldı. Abdominoplasti sırasında, göbek deliği karın ön duvarından üç kollu yıldız şeklinde ayrıldı. Göbek deliği karın ön duvarında yeni yerine çıkartılırken ise Y şekilli bir insizyon kullanıldı. Hastalar yeni göbek deliklerinin şeklini, derinliğini, yerini ve izlerini değerlendirmek açısından sorgulandılar.Bulgular: Ortalama takip süresi 20 aydır. Hipertrofik nedbe gibi herhangi bir göbek deliğine bağlı bir komplikasyon gözlenmedi. Hastaların %80'i sonuçlardan memnuniyet durumuna 10 üzerinden 8 puan verdiler. Sonuç: Tanımlanan teknikte, göbek deliği küçük, sığ ve ovaldi. Nedbe daha az görünürdü. Nedbe çekilmesi, göbek deliğinin daralması gibi sık görünen problemler bizim güvenli tekniğimizde daha az görünmekteydi

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZAR, M., YAZAR, S. K., SİRVAN, S. S., UĞURLU, A. M., KARŞIDAĞ, S. (2017). A New Umbilicoplasty Technique for Forming an Umbilical Chalice with Key and Hole Pattern Flaps. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 76–81. https://ajindex.com/articles/364157

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Craig SB, Faller MS, Puckett CL. In search of the ideal female umbilicus. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Lee MJ, Mustoe TA. Simplified technique for creating a youthful umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Pallua N, Markowicz MP, Grosse F, Walter S. Aesthetically pleasant umbilicoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 2010
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Baroudi R. Umbilicoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 1975
  5. Akbas H, Guneren E, Eroglu L, Uysal OA. Natural-looking umbilicus as an important part of abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2003
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Lesavoy MA, Fan K, Guenther DA, Herrera F, Little JW. The inverted-v chevron umbilicoplasty for breast reconstruction and abdominoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2012
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Rozen SM, Redett R. The two-dermal-flap umbilical transposition: a natural and aesthetic umbilicus after abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Juri J, Juri C, Raiden G. Reconstruction of the umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Jamra FA. Reconstruction of the umbilicus by a double V-Y procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Malic CC, Spyrou GE, Hough M, Fourie L. Patient satisfaction with two different methods of umbilicoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Lee SJ, Garg S, Lee HP. Computer-Aided Analysis of the “Beautiful” Umbilicus. Aesthet Surg J 2014
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Pfulg M, Van de Sijpe K, Blondeel P. A simple new technique for neo-umbilicoplasty. Br J Plast Surg 2005
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Cannistra C, Pecorelli E. Umbilical restoration in abdominal dermolipectomy: a simple double-Y, double-M technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1999
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Lacerda DJ, Martins DM, Marques A, Brenda E, de Moura Andrews J. Umbilicoplasty for the abdomen with a thin adipose layer. Br J Plast Surg 1994
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Bruekers SE, van der Lei B, Tan TL, Luijendijk RW, Stevens HP. “Scarless” umbilicoplasty: a new umbilicoplasty technique and a review of the English language literature. Ann Plast Surg 2009
  16. [CrossRef] 16. Schoeller T, Wechselberger G, Otto A, Rainer C, Schwabegger A, Lille S, Ninković M. New technique for scarless umbilical reinsertion in abdominoplasty procedures Plast Reconstr Surg 1998
  17. [CrossRef] 17. Mazzocchi M, Trignano E, Armenti AF, Figus A, Dessy LA. Long-term resul