Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2015 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 2

Our experience in nerve sparing laparascopic radical hysterectomy in treatment of early stage cervical cancer

Erken evre serviks kanseri tedavisinde sinir koruyucu laparaskopik radikal histerektomi deneyimlerimiz

Pages
112–117
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In treatment of early stage cervical cancer, laparascopic nevre-sparing radical hysterec - tomy is as effective as other surgical techniques, and a superior approach for patient’s quality of life considering less altered bladder function.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of laparascopic approach in management of patients undergoing nevre-sparing radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer Material and Method: 14 patients who had early stage (1A1-1B1) and undergone laparascopic nerve sparing radical hysterectomy were analysed retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Mean age of patients was 44 (min 26 max 53), mean BMI was 30 (min 23 max 47), mean gravida was 4.7 (min0 max 12), mean parity was 8 (min 0 max 8).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In treatment of early stage cervical cancer, laparascopic nevre-sparing radical hysterec - tomy is as effective as other surgical techniques, and a superior approach for patient’s quality of life considering less altered bladder function.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of laparascopic approach in management of patients undergoing nevre-sparing radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer Material and Method: 14 patients who had early stage (1A1-1B1) and undergone laparascopic nerve sparing radical hysterectomy were analysed retrospectively. Results: Mean age of patients was 44 (min 26 max 53), mean BMI was 30 (min 23 max 47), mean gravida was 4.7 (min0 max 12), mean parity was 8 (min 0 max 8). Mean duration of surgery- both laparascopic nevre-sparing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection- was 228 minutes. Fifteen lymph nodes and 2.2 centimeters of vaginal tissue were extracted in average. Intestinal func - tions had returned in one day after surgery. Bladder catheter and abdominal drain were removed after 2.5 days (min 1 max 5) and 3.3 days (min 2 max 7) respectively. Complete surgical resection was achieved in all patients. Mean follow up duration was 15 months. No recurrence or patient death were present during this time period. Conclusion: In treatment of early stage cervical cancer, laparascopic nevre-sparing radical hysterec - tomy is as effective as other surgical techniques, and a superior approach for patient’s quality of life considering less altered bladder function.

Özet

Amaç: Kliniğimizde laparaskopik sinir koruyucu radikal histerektomi (LSKRH) yapılan erken evre ser- vikal kanserli hastaların tanı, tedavi ve takipleri ile ilgili deneyimlerimizi litaratür eşliğinde sunmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamızda retrospektif olarak LSKRH yapılan erken evre (evre IA1-IB1) serviks kanserli 14 hasta incelendi. Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması 44 (min 26, maks 53), vucut kitle indeksi (BMI) ortalaması 30 (min 23, maks 47), gravida ortalaması 4.7 (min 0, maks 12), parite ortalaması 8 (min 0, maks 8) ola - rak bulundu. LSKRH ile birlikte pelvik lenf nod diseksiyon yapılma süremiz ortalama 288 dakikadır. Ortalama pelvik 15 tane lenf nodu ve ortalama 2.2 cm vajen boyu çıkarılmıştır. Hastaların birinci gün barsak fonksiyonları geri dönmüştür. Mesane sondası ortalama 2.5 (min1, maks 5) gün ve batın dreni ortalama 3.3 (min 2, maks 7) gün sonra çıkarılmıştır. Tüm hastalarda tam cerrahi rezeksiyon yapıldı. Hasta takip süresi ortalama 15 aydır. Bu süre içinde hiç nüks gelişmemiştir ve hasta ölümü olmamıştır. Sonuç: LNSRH, erken evre servikal kanserli hastaların tedavisinde diğer cerrahi yöntemler kadar etkili ve mesane fonksiyonlarının daha az bozulduğu için hasta yaşam kalitesi açısından üstün bir yöntemdir. Anahtar kelimeler: Erken evre serviks kanserleri, laparaskopik sinir koruyucu radikal histerektomi, cerrahi sonuçlar

🔖

Cite This Article

TEMİZKAN, O., AŞICIOĞLU, O., ŞANVERDİ, İ., ARICI, B., AYHAN, I., ÇETİN, Ö. (2015). Our experience in nerve sparing laparascopic radical hysterectomy in treatment of early stage cervical cancer. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 2, 112–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/364056

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer 2001;94:153-6
  2. Moyer VA. Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2012;156:880-91
  3. Pecorelli S, Revised FIGO staging carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009;105:107
  4. Bansal N, Herzog TJ, Shaw RE, Burke WM, Deutsch I, Wright JD. Primary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:485
  5. Basar E, Dursun P, Esin S, Ayhan AT. Erken evre serviks kanserlerinde güncel cerrahi tedavi. Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi 2008;1:1-8
  6. Sevin BU, Lu Y, Bloch DA. Surgically defined prognostic parameters in patients with early cervical carcinoma. A multivariate survival tree analysis. Cancer 1996;78:1438-46
  7. Rogers L, Siu SS, Luesley D, Bryant A, Dickinson HO. Radiotherapy and chemoradiation after surgery for early cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:CD007583
  8. Feng SY, Zhang YN, Liu JG. Risk factors and prognosis of node- positive cervical carcinoma. Ai Zheng. 2005;24:1261-6
  9. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical practice guidelinesinoncology.http://www.nccn.org/ professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp (Accessed on April 01, 2014)
  10. Nam JH, Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:903-11
  11. Lee CL, Huang KG, Jain S. Comparison of laparoscopic and conventional surgery in the treatment of early cervical cancer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002;9:481-87
  12. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Neugut AI, Burke WM, Lu YS, Lewin SN, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012;127:11-7
  13. Frumovitz M, Ramirez PT, Greer M. Laparoscopic training and practice in gynecologic oncology among Society of Gynecologic Oncologists members and fellows-in-training. Gynecol Oncol 2004;94:746-53
  14. Mabrouk M, Frumovitz M, Greer M. Trends in laparoscopic and robotic surgery among gynecologic oncologists: a survey update. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112:501-5
  15. Yamaguchi K, Kobayashi M, Kato T, Akita K. Origins and distribution of nerves to the female urinary bladder: new anatomical findings in the sex differences. Clin Anat 2011;24:880- 5
  16. Zullo MA, Manci N, Angioli R