Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2009 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Adolescent and old age pregnants obstetric results

Adolesan ve ileri yaş gebeliklerde obstetrik sonuçlar

Pages
1–7
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion: This study has shown that adolescent pregnants and pregnants above 35 years old constitude high risk group, we should provide social support, education and regular follow-ups in order to have better pregnancy outcomes for both groups.We should take care about the possible complications and follow-up issues in those patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim:Adolescent pregnants are compared with old age pregnants in terms of maternal and fetal outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods:Adolescent and old age pregnants admitted to Şişli Etfal Training and Resource Hospital 1.Gynecology and obstetric clinic between 2002-2007 are compared in a retrospective case-control study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion: This study has shown that adolescent pregnants and pregnants above 35 years old constitude high risk group, we should provide social support, education and regular follow-ups in order to have better pregnancy outcomes for both groups.We should take care about the possible complications and follow-up issues in those patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002-2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Parite · Gebelik · Gebelik komplikasyonları

Abstract

Aim:Adolescent pregnants are compared with old age pregnants in terms of maternal and fetal outcomes. Methods:Adolescent and old age pregnants admitted to Şişli Etfal Training and Resource Hospital 1.Gynecology and obstetric clinic between 2002-2007 are compared in a retrospective case-control study. Results:Although the rate of low birth weight infant,premature labour and prematurity are found to be higher in adolescents of whom majority‘re nulliparous than older patients;there is no difference in terms of fetal distress,fetal injury and the need for newborn intensive care unit.There is no difference in terms of gestational week at birth between adolescent and other pregnants;however,there is lower rate of macrosomic infant and caeserian section(C/S).Perinatal mortality is not influenced by the maternal age.The indication for C/S in adolescents are mostly CPD and primigravida breech presentation whereas in older ones the indications mostly are previous C/S.The rate of fetal distress is similar in both groups.The rate of prenatal follow-up is low especially in adolescent pregnants and pregnants above 35 years old.Cohabitation rate is higher in adolescents than other pregnants whereas educational status in adolescents is inadequate. Discussion: This study has shown that adolescent pregnants and pregnants above 35 years old constitude high risk group, we should provide social support, education and regular follow-ups in order to have better pregnancy outcomes for both groups.We should take care about the possible complications and follow-up issues in those patients.

Özet

Amaç: Adolesan gebeler, ileri yaştaki gebeler ile maternal ve fetal sonuçlar açısından karşılaştırıldı. Metod: 2002-2007 yılları arasında Şişli Etfal Hastanesi 1.Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği’ne başvuran adolesan gebeler ile ileri yaş gebeler retrospektif vaka kontrol çalışması ile karşılaştırıldı. Sonuçlar: Büyük çoğunluğu nullipar olan adolesanlarda düşük doğum ağırlıklı yenidoğan, preterm eylem ve prematürite oranı ileri yaş hastalara göre yüksek saptanırken, fetal distress, fetal hasar, yeni doğan yoğun bakım gereksinimi açısından fark saptanmadı. Adolesanlar ile diğer gebeler arasında doğumdaki gebelik haftası açısından fark saptanmaz iken, daha az makrosomik infant ve daha düşük sezaryen oranları izlendi. Perinatal mortalite maternal yaştan etkilenmedi. Adolesanlarda sezaryen endikasyonu ön planda baş pelvis uygunsuzluğu(CPD) ve primigravid makat geliş(PMG) iken, ileri yaş gebelerde en sık endikasyon eski sezaryendi. Fetal distress endikasyonu ile sezaryen üç grupta da benzerdi. Özellikle adolesan ve 35 yaş üstü gebelerde prenatal takip oranı düşük saptandı. Adolesanlarda nikahsız birliktelik oranı diğer gebelere göre yüksek iken, eğitim durumu yetersiz saptandı. Tartışma: Bu çalışma göstermiştir ki; adolesan ve 35 yaş üstü gebeler yüksek riskli grubu oluşturmakta, her iki gruba da gebelik sonuçlarının düzeltilmesi için sosyal destek, eğitim ve düzenli takip ortamı sağlanmalıdır. Bu hastalarda oluşabilecek komplikasyonlar ve gebeliğin takibi konusunda özen gösterilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEKEROĞLU, M., BAKSU, A., İNCE, Z., GÜLTEKİN, H., GÖKER, N., ÖZSOY, S. (2009). Adolescent and old age pregnants obstetric results. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 1–7. https://ajindex.com/articles/363956

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Chandra PC, Schiavello HJ, Ravi B, Weinstein AG, Hook FB. Pregnancy outcomes in urban teenagers. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002 Nov;79(2):117-22
  2. Ventura SJ, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Variations in teenage birth rates, 1991-98: national and state trends. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2000 Apr 24;48(6):1-13
  3. Stevens-Simon C, McAnarney ER. Adolescent pregnancy. Gestational weight gain and maternal and infant outcomes. Am J Dis Child. 1992 Nov;146(11):1359-64
  4. Hoekelman RA. Teenage pregnancy--one of our nation's most challenging dilemmas. Pediatr Ann. 1993 Feb;22(2):81-2. No abstract available
  5. DuPlessis HM, Bell R, Richards T. Adolescent pregnancy: understanding the impact of age and race on outcomes. J Adolesc Health. 1997 Mar;20(3):187-97. 6)Amini SB, Catalano PM, Dierker LJ, Mann LI. Births to teenagers: trends and obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;87(5 Pt 1):668-74
  6. Yoder BA, Young MK. 1: Miller FC. Impact of adolescent pregnancy as we approach the new millennium. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2000 Feb;13(1):5-8
  7. Neonatal outcomes of teenage pregnancy in a military population. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Oct;90(4 Pt 1):500-6
  8. Forman SF, Aruda MM, Emans SJ, Woods ER. Follow-up of pregnant teens at a hospital-based clinic. J Adolesc Health. 1995 Sep;17(3):193-7
  9. Hediger ML, Scholl TO, Schall JI, Krueger PM. Young maternal age and preterm labor. Ann Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;7(6):400-6
  10. English PB, Kharrazi M, Guendelman S. Pregnancy outcomes and risk factors in Mexican Americans: the effect of language use and mother's birthplace. Ethn Dis. 1997 Autumn;7(3):229-40
  11. Williams RL, Binkin NJ, Clingman EJ. Pregnancy outcomes among Spanish-surname women in California. Am J Public Health. 1986 Apr;76(4):387-91
  12. Creatsas GC. Adolescent pregnancy in Europe. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1995;40 Suppl 2:80-4
  13. Wasunna A, Mohammed K. Low birthweight babies: socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics of adolescent mothers at Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi. East Afr Med J. 2002 Oct;79(10):543-6
  14. Norbeck JS, Anderson NJ. Psychosocial predictors of pregnancy outcomes in low-income black, Hispanic, and white women. Nurs Res. 1989 Jul-Aug;38(4):204-9
  15. Chang SC, O'Brien KO, Nathanson MS, Mancini J, Witter FR. Characteristics and risk factors for adverse birth outcomes in pregnant black adolescents. J Pediatr. 2003 Aug;143(2):250-7
  16. Engel T, Alexander GR, Leland NL. Pregnancy outcomes of U.S.-born Puerto Ricans: the role of matern