Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2013 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1

Percutaneous tracheotomy practices in our intensive care unit (ICU)

Yoğun bakım ünitemizdeki (YBÜ) perkütan trakeotomi pratiğimiz

Pages
11–15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Result: Percutaneous tracheotomy which was practiced for indications such as need for mechanical ventilation for long time, easing weaning, providing urgent airway in ICU; is simple, has low complication ratio and is minimally invasive practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction and Objective: Percutaneous tracheotomy practice is usually preferred at ICU for the advantages of able to be applied in a short time and at the bedside and it causes less bleeding.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to analyze tracheotomies that were opened in our ICU in last 4 years, within the terms of practice day, practicing duration and post practice complications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Result: Percutaneous tracheotomy which was practiced for indications such as need for mechanical ventilation for long time, easing weaning, providing urgent airway in ICU; is simple, has low complication ratio and is minimally invasive practice.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: Percutaneous tracheotomy practice is usually preferred at ICU for the advantages of able to be applied in a short time and at the bedside and it causes less bleeding. It is the alternative of surgical tracheotomy. The aim of this study is to analyze tracheotomies that were opened in our ICU in last 4 years, within the terms of practice day, practicing duration and post practice complications. Method: 132 percutaneous tracheotomy practiced cases of 603 cases that were treated in our reanimation unit between 01.01.2007 and 31.12.2010 were analyzed. Percutaneous tracheotomy practices were conducted via Griggs technique by a team. Demographic information, practice day, total mechanical ventilation days, practicing duration and post practice complications were recorded. Findings: 603 cases were followed up and treated in ICU in last 4 years. 132 Percutaneous tracheotomy practices were applied in this period. It is figured out that women-man ratio was 62/70, the mean of age of the cases was 58.65±17.22 years, the mean hospitalization time of cases was 38.77±28.74 days, the mean intubation time before tracheotomy practice was 8.20±5.44 days, total mechanical ventilation days 26.85±21.70 and the mean practicing duration of operation was 6.1±2.1 minutes. 86 cases were deceased due to the comorbidities at ICU. 46 cases were transferred to the related services. Total complication (8 cases) were encountered. Result: Percutaneous tracheotomy which was practiced for indications such as need for mechanical ventilation for long time, easing weaning, providing urgent airway in ICU; is simple, has low complication ratio and is minimally invasive practice.

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Perkütan trakeotomi(PT) uygulaması, kısa sürede yatak başında uygulanabilme ve daha az kanama gibi avantajları, ayrıca uzamış yapay solunum gereksinimi, “weaning”in kolaylaştı- rılması, acil hava yolu sağlanması gibi endikasyonlarla yoğun bakım ünitelerinde sıklıkla tercih edilir. Cerrahi trakeostomiye alternatif yöntemdir. Bu çalışmada ki amacımız YBÜ’mizde son 4 yılda açılan trakeotomileri uygulama günü, uygulama zamanı ve uygulama sonrası komplikasyonları açısından analiz etmektir. Yöntem: 01.01.2007 ve 31.12.2010 tarihleri arasında YBÜ’mizde tedavi edilen 603 olgudan perkutan trakeotomi uygulanan 132 olgu analiz edildi. Perkütan trakeotomi uygulaması griggs tekniğiyle bir ekip tarafından gerçekleştirildi. Demografik verileri, uygulama günü, toplam mekanik ventilasyon günü, uygulama zamanı ve uygulama sonrası komplikasyonları kayıt edildi. Bulgular: Son 4 yılda YBÜ’mizde takip ve tedavi edilen 603 olgudan 132’sine perkütan trakeoto- mi pratiği bu periotta uygulandı. Kadın-Erkek oranı 62/70, olguların yaş ortalaması 58.65±17.22 yıl, olguların ortalama hastanede yatış süresi 38.77±28.74 gün, trakeotomi pratiği öncesi ortalama entü- basyon süresi 8.20±5.44 gün, toplam mekanik ventilasyon süresi 26.85±21.70 gün ve ortalama ope- rasyon uygulama zamanı 6.1±2.1 dakikaydı. 86 olgu komorbiditelerinden dolayı YBÜ’mizde öldü. 46 olgu ilgili servislere transfer edildi. Toplam komplikasyonlar (8 olgu) kayıt edildi. Sonuç: YBÜ’de uzamış mekanik ventilasyon ihtiyacı, weaning’i kolaylaştırması, acil hava yolu sağla- ması gibi endikasyonlarla uygulanan peruktan trakeotomi basit, düşük komplikasyon oranına sahip ve minimal girişimsel uygulamadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOTOZ, T., TÜRK, H. Ş., SAYIN, P., ÜNSAL, O., ÇINAR, S., OBA, S. (2013). Percutaneous tracheotomy practices in our intensive care unit (ICU). Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1, 11–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/363810

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Plummer AL, Gracey DR. Consensus conference on artificial airways in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest 1989;96:178-80
  2. Marsh HM, Gillespie DJ, Baumgartner AE. Timing of tracheostomy in the critically ill patients. Chest 1989;96:190-3
  3. Whited RE. A prospective study of laryngotracheal sequelae in term intubation. Laryngoscope 1984;94:367-77
  4. Friedman Y. Indications, timing, techniques and complications of tracheostomy in the critically ill patient. Curr Opin Crit Care 1996;2:47-53
  5. Borman J, Davidson JT. A history of tracheostomy: Si spiritim ducit vivit. Br J Anaesth 1963;35:388-90
  6. Frost EAM. Tracing the tracheostomy. Ann Otol 1976;85:618-24
  7. Jackson C. Tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 1909;19:285-90
  8. Shelden CH, Pudenz RH, Freshwater DB, et al. New method for tracheotomy. J Neurosurgical 1955;12:428-31
  9. Ciaglia P, Firshing R, Syniec C. Elective percutaneous dilational tracheostomy: a new simple bedside procedure. Chest 1985;87:715-9
  10. Griggs WM, Wortley LIG, Gilligan JE, et al. A simple percutaneous tracheostomy technique. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 170: 543-5
  11. Anon JM, Gomez V, Escuela P, et al. Percutaneous tracheostomy: comparison of Ciaglia and Griggs techniques. Crit Care 2000;4:124-8
  12. Rao BK, Pande R, Sharma SC, et al. Percutaneous tracheostomy. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia 2003;6:19-26
  13. Angel LF, Simpson CB: Comparison of surgical and percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Clin Chest Med 2003; 24:423-429
  14. Oliver ER, Gist A, Gillespie MB. Percutaneous versus surgical tracheotomy: an updated meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2007 Sep;117(9):1570-5
  15. Kearney PA, Griffen MM, Ochoa JB, Boulanger BR, Tseui BJ, Mentzer RM Jr: A single-center 8-year experience with percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Ann Surg 2000; 231:701-9
  16. Halum SL, Ting JY, Plowman EK, Belafsky PC, Harbarger CF, Postma GN, Pitman MJ, LaMonica D, Moscatello A, Khosla S, Cauley CE, Maronian NC, Melki S, Wick C, Sinacori JT, White Z, Younes A, Ekbom DC, Sardesai MG, Merati AL. A multi-institutional analysis of tracheotomy complications. Laryngoscope. 2012 Jan;122(1):38-45. doi: 10.1002/lary.22364
  17. Luna Azoulay B, Béquignon A, Babin E, Moreau S. Preliminary results of percutaneous tracheotomies. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 2009 Jun;126(3):125-32
  18. Wang MB, Berke GS, Ward PH, Calcaterra TC, Watts D. Early experience with percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 1992;102:157-62
  19. Hazard PB, Garrett HE Jr,