Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2015 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3

The effect of estradiol and prolactine levels on embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophine of patients who have down regulation with GnRH agonist and antagonist in ICSI/ET cycles

GnRH Agonist veya Antagonist ile Down Regülasyon Yapılan ICSI/ET Sikluslarında İnsan Koryonik Gonadotropin Günü Bakılan Estradiol, Prolaktin Düzeylerinin Embriyo Kalitesi ve Gebelik Sonuçlarına Etkisi

Pages
174–180
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Inaddition, the day of hCG viewed E2 and PRL showed no significant use in predicting the occurrence of pregnancy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In patients who have normal ovarian response in vitro fertilization (IVF) during GnRH-agonist and GnRH- antagonist treatment on embryo quality and E2 and prolactine levels on human chorionic gonadotropine day; pregnancy outcomes were evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methots: Analyse of 115 women aged 18–40 years who underwen to varian hyperstimulation in fresh cycles down regulated either with GnRH agonist (n=44) or GnRH antagonist (n=71) followed by oocyte pick-up, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and embryo transfer are prospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Inaddition, the day of hCG viewed E2 and PRL showed no significant use in predicting the occurrence of pregnancy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In patients who have normal ovarian response in vitro fertilization (IVF) during GnRH-agonist and GnRH- antagonist treatment on embryo quality and E2 and prolactine levels on human chorionic gonadotropine day; pregnancy outcomes were evaluated. Methots: Analyse of 115 women aged 18–40 years who underwen to varian hyperstimulation in fresh cycles down regulated either with GnRH agonist (n=44) or GnRH antagonist (n=71) followed by oocyte pick-up, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and embryo transfer are prospectively analyzed. PRL and E2 values performed basal and on the day of hCG injection. Demographic data, ovarian responses, endometrial thickness, development of embryo and IVF result among groups were compared. Results: Treatment protocols of the number of oocyte sobtained as a result, the number of oocytes and thenumber of mature oocytes that fertilized and not statistically different. Endometrial thickness and endometrial appearance day of hCG, which is viewed as ultrasound, serum E2 (1818±1064 pg/mL vs 1592±860 pg/ml, respectively, p>0.05) and PRL (34.2±20.1 ng/mL vs 30.3±15.4 ng/ml, respectively, p>0.05) were not statistically different between the two groups. GnRH-agonist and GnRH-antagonist result of treatment cycles with fertilization rate (60.3% and 60.9%, respectively, p>0.05), implantation rate (20.5% and 23.5%, respectively, p>0.05), pregnancy rate (27.3% and 21.1%, respectively, p>0.05) was not statistically different. Pregnancy rates for the day of hCG viewed E2 and PRL for AUC levels ROC curve analysis results of IVF / ICSI was observed cycles can not be used to predict the occurrence of pregnancy (AUC 0.505, 95% CI: 0372-0638; AUC 0.412, 95% CI: 0.286 to 0.537, respectively). Conclusions: GnRH-agonist or GnRH-antagonist protocol in patients with normal ovarian response had no effect on embryo quality and diversity of this treatment has been shown to affect pregnancy outcomes. GnRH agonists and antagonists on day of hCG in cycles E2 and PRL mean blood levels viewed were not significantly different. Inaddition, the day of hCG viewed E2 and PRL showed no significant use in predicting the occurrence of pregnancy.

Özet

Amaç: Normal over yanıtlı hastalarda in vitro fertilizasyon (IVF) sırasında GnRH-agonist ve GnRH-antagonist tedavi- nin embriyo kalitesine ve insan koryonik gonadotropin (hCG) günü bakılan E2 ve PRL düzeylerine olan etkisine bağlı olarak gebelik sonuçlarına etkisi değerlendirilmiştir. Yöntem: Kontrollü ovaryan hiperstimülasyonda GnRH agonist (n=44) veya GnRH (n=71) antagonist ile down regü- lasyonu yapılarak oosit toplanması, intrastoplazmik sperm injeksiyonu (ICSI) ve embriyo transferi yapılan 18-40 yaş arası 115 hastada prospektif olarak çalışılmıştır. hCG yapılma günü ve bazal serum E2 ve PRL düzeyleri ölçülmüştür. Demografik bilgiler, over cevabı, endometriyal kalınlık, embriyo gelişimi, ve IVF sonuçları her iki grup arasında kar- şılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Tedavi protokolleri sonucunda elde edilen oosit sayısı, matür olan oosit sayısı ve fertilize olan oosit sayısı istatiksel olarak farklı değildir. hCG günü ultrasonografik olarak bakılan endometriyal kalınlık ve endometriyal görü- nüm, serum E2 (1818±1064 pg/ml vs 1592±860 pg/ml, sırasıyla, p>0.05) ve PRL (34.2±20.1 ng/ml vs, 30.3±15.4 ng/ml, sırasıyla, p>0.05) düzeyleri iki grup arasında istatiksel olarak farklı değildir. GnRH-agonist ve GnRH-antagonist tedavi siklusları sonucunda fertilizasyon oranı (60.3% ve 60.9%, sırasıyla, p>0.05), implantasyon oranı (20.5% ve 23.5%, sırasıyla, p>0.05), gebelik oranı (27.3% ve 21.1%, sırasıyla, p>0.05) istatiksel olarak farklı değildir. Gebelik oranları için hCG günü bakılan E2 ve PRL AUC düzeyleri için yapılan ROC eğim analizi sonuçları IVF/ICSI sikluslarında gebelik oluşumunu tahmin etmede kullanılamayacağı görülmüştür (AUC 0.505, 95% CI: 0.372–0.638; AUC 0.412, 95% CI: 0.286-0.537, sırasıyla ). Yorum: GnRH-agonist veya GnRH-antagonist tedavi protokolü uygulanan normal over yanıtlı hastalarda bu tedavi farklılığının embriyo kalitesi üzerine etkisi olmadığı ve gebelik sonuçlarını etkilemediği görülmüştür. GnRH-agonist ve antagonist sikluslarda hCG günü bakılan E2 ve PRL ortalama kan düzeyleri farklı bulunmamıştır. Ayrıca hCG günü bakılan E2 ve PRL düzeylerinin gebelik oluşumunu tahmin etmede kullanılmasının anlamlı olmadığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEMİZKAN, O., ÇÖĞENDEZ, E., ŞANVERDİ, İ., TEMİZKAN, Ş., KUTLU, T., AYHAN, I., ARICI, B., AŞICIOĞLU, O. (2015). The effect of estradiol and prolactine levels on embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophine of patients who have down regulation with GnRH agonist and antagonist in ICSI/ET cycles. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3, 174–180. https://ajindex.com/articles/363781

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Riad ON, Hak AA. Assessment of endometrial receptivity using Doppler ultrasonography in infertile women undergoing intrauterine insemination. Gynecol Endocrinol 2014;30:70-3
  2. Orvieto R, Meltzer S, Rabinson J, Zohav E, Anteby EY, Nahum R. GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: the role of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 2008;90:1294-6
  3. Xiao JS, Su CM, Zeng XT. Comparisons of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol in supposed normal ovarian responders undergoing IVF: a systematic review and meta- analysis. PLoS One 2014;12;9:e106854
  4. Choi MH, Lee SH, Kim HO, Cha SH, Kim JY, Yang KM, et al. Comparison of assisted reproductive technology outcomes in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome: In vitro maturation, GnRH agonist, and GnRH antagonist cycles. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2012;39:166-71
  5. Joo BS, Park SH, An BM, Kim KS, Moon SE, Moon HS. Serum estradiol levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation influence the pregnancy outcome of in vitro fertilization in a concentration-dependent manner. Fertil Steril 2010;9:442-6
  6. Gelety TJ, Buyalos RP. The influence of supraphysiologic E2 levels on human nidation. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995;12:406- 12
  7. Kosmas IP, Kolibianakis EM, Devroey P. Association of estradiol levels on the day of hCG administration and pregnancy achievement in IVF:a systematic review. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2446-53
  8. Gonen Y, Casper RF. The influence of transient hyperprolactinemia on hormonal parameters, oocyte recovery, and fertilization rates in in vitro fertilization. J InVitro Fertil Embryo Transf 1989;6:155-9
  9. Hummel WP, Clark MR, Talbert LM. Transient hyperprolactinemia during cycle stimulation and its influence on oocyte retrieval and fertilization rates. Fertil Steril 1990;53:677-81
  10. Piekos MW. Effects of induced hyperprolactinemia on in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 1995;63:371-6
  11. Ozaki T, Takahashi K, Kurioka H, Miyazaki K. Influence of midluteal serum prolactin on outcome of pregnancy after IVF-ET: a preliminary study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001;18:387-90
  12. Ludwig M, Katalinic A, Banz C, Schröder AK, Löning M, Weiss JM, et al. Tailoring the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix acetate to individual patients needs in ovarian stimulation for IVF: results of a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod 2002;17:2842-45
  13. Al-Inany HG, Youssef MA, Aboulghar M, Broekmans F, Sterrenburg M, et al. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive