Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2018 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3

Laparoscopic Gastrostomy in Children: 10 Years of Experience

Pages
169–172
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The trocar site primary laparoscopic gastrostomy is a safe and easy technique with complication rates comparable to other gastrostomy methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Laparoscopic gastrostomy is a widely used procedure in children with failure to thrive, feeding disorders, or neurologic impairment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to present 10 years of experience in laparoscopic gastrostomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The trocar site primary laparoscopic gastrostomy is a safe and easy technique with complication rates comparable to other gastrostomy methods.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: Laparoscopic gastrostomy is a widely used procedure in children with failure to thrive, feeding disorders, or neurologic impairment. Various methods of laparoscopic gastrostomy and fixing stomach to abdominal wall have been described. Trocar site primary gastrostomy under laparoscopic control is a simple and easy technique that does not require special instruments and a kit. The aim of this study was to present 10 years of experience in laparoscopic gastrostomy. Methods: The charts of 128 children who underwent laparoscopic gastrostomy between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The data, including demographics, operative procedures, and complications, were recorded. All children underwent preoperative contrast imaging and 24-hour Ph monitorization. In all patients, the trocar site primary gastrostomy was done. A gastrostomy tube or a button was inserted into the stomach in the center of a purse–string suture loop, and the stomach was fixed to the anterior rectus sheath extracorporeally. Results: There were 49 girls (38.3%) and 79 boys (61.7%). The mean age was 50 months at surgery (1 day–18 years), and the average body weight was 13 kg (2300 gr–65 kg). Both laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and gastrostomy were done in 116 (90.6%) patients, and 12 (9.4%) patients had only laparoscopic gastrostomy. Infection at the site of gastrostomy, which was treated by antibiotics, was the most common complication, observed in 14 (11%) patients. Peritoneal leakage within 30 days was seen in 9 (7%) patients. Severe dislodgement of gastrostomy resulting in operative intervention occurred in 5 (3.9%) patients. Granuloma developed in 4 (3.1%) patients and was treated with silver nitrate. Conclusion: The trocar site primary laparoscopic gastrostomy is a safe and easy technique with complication rates comparable to other gastrostomy methods.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATEŞ, U., GURBANOV, A., GÖLLÜ, G., TAŞTEKİN, N. Y., SÖZDUYAR, S., ERGÜN, E., YAĞMURLU, E. A., ÇAKMAK, A. M., AKTUĞ, T., DİNDAR, H., BİNGÖL-KOLOĞLU, M. (2018). Laparoscopic Gastrostomy in Children: 10 Years of Experience. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3, 169–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/363738

References (14)

  1. Angsten G, Danielson J, Kassa AM, Lilja HE. Outcome of laparoscopic versus open gastrostomy in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2015;31:1067–72.
  2. Yap BK, Nah SA, Chen Y, Low Y. Fundoplication with gastrostomy vs gastrostomy alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications. Pediatr Surg Int 2017;33:217–28.
  3. Sulkowski JP, De Roo AC, Nielsen J, Ambeba E, Cooper JN, Hogan MJ, et al. A comparison of pediatric gastrostomy tube placement techniques. Pediatr Surg Int 2016;32:269–75.
  4. Gonzalez-Hernandez J, Daoud Y, Fischer AC, Barth B, Piper HG. Endoscopic button gastrostomy: Comparing a sutured endoscopic approach to the current techniques. J Pediatr Surg 2016;51:72–5.
  5. Humphrey GM, Najmaldin A. Laparoscopic gastrostomy in children. Pediatr Surg Int 1997;12:501–4.
  6. Aprahamian CJ, Morgan TL, Harmon CM, Georgeson KE, Barnhart DC. U-stitch laparoscopic gastrostomy technique has a low rate of complications and allows primary button placement: experience with 461 pediatric procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv SurgTech A 2006;16:643–9.
  7. Antonoff MB, Hess DJ, Saltzman DA, Acton RD. Modified approach to laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement minimizes complications. Pediatr SurgInt 2009;25:349–53.
  8. Hassan SF, Pimpalwar AP. Modified laparoendoscopic gastrostomy tube (LEGT) placement. Pediatr Surg Int 2011;27:1249–54.
  9. Villalona GA, Mckee MA, Diefenbach KA. Modified laparoscopic gastrostomy technique reduces gastrostomy tract dehiscence. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011;21:355–9.
  10. Mizrahi I, Garg M, Divino CM, Nguyen S. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open approach to gastrostomy tubes. JSLS 2014;18:28–33.
  11. Sano N, Yamamoto M, Nagai K, Yamada K, Ohkohchi N. Nasogastric tube syndrome induced by an indwelling long intestinal tube. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:4057–61.
  12. Spurrier EJ, Johnston AM. Use of nasogastric tubes in trauma patients-a review. J R Army Med Corps 2008;154:10–3. Makama JG. Uses and hazards of nasogastric tube in gastrointestinal diseases: an update for clinicians. Ann of Nigerian Med 2010;4:37–44. Collins JB 3rd, Georgeson KE, Vicente Y, Hardin WD Jr. Comparison of open and laparoscopic gastrostomy and fundoplication in 120 patients. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:1065–70.
  13. Bankhead RR, Fisher CA, Rolandelli RH. Gastrostomy tube placement outcomes: comparison of surgical, endoscopic, and laparoscopic methods. Nutr Clin Pract 2005;20:607–12.
  14. Jones VS, La Hei ER, Shun A. Laparoscopic gastrostomy: the preferred method of gastrostomy in children. Pediatr Surg