Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2019 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1

Multidimensional Analysis of Urinary Stone Diseases in Pediatric Patients

Pages
46–48
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In 52% of the cases, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was performed, and 71%underwent surgical treatment.Conclusion: Metabolic evaluation and stone analysis should be performed to prevent future recurrences in children with urinarystone disease and lifelong follow-up should be emphasized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Urinary tract stones are less common in children than in adults.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristicsand possible risk factors for urinary stone disease in pediatric patients.Methods: The data of 126 patients with urinary stone disease who were treated in a pediatric nephrology clinic between 2000 and2014 were analyzed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In 52% of the cases, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was performed, and 71%underwent surgical treatment.Conclusion: Metabolic evaluation and stone analysis should be performed to prevent future recurrences in children with urinarystone disease and lifelong follow-up should be emphasized.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: Urinary tract stones are less common in children than in adults. Determining the etiology is the most important stepto achieve successful treatment and prevent future recurrence. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristicsand possible risk factors for urinary stone disease in pediatric patients.Methods: The data of 126 patients with urinary stone disease who were treated in a pediatric nephrology clinic between 2000 and2014 were analyzed retrospectively. A total 126 patients were enrolled in the study: 70 (55%) male and 56 (45%) female patientswere included. The complaints, age of diagnosis, family histories, and stone location were examined. Direct urine microscopicexamination, complete urinalysis, and urine culture were performed for all of the patients. Calcium, uric acid, oxalate, citrate, magnesium, and cystine levels were measured in urine collected in a 24-hour period. Serum electrolyte, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, calcium, phosphorus, uric acid, and albumin levels were measured. Urinary ultrasound was performed. Stone analysis wasconducted using the X-ray diffraction method. The mean age of the patients was 55 months (range: 1-162 months) at presentation.Results: In all, 34% of the patients had a family history of urinary stone disease. The rate of previous urinary tract infection was 26%.It was determined that 34% of the patients had been taking vitamin D and 5% had been taking a high dose. Metabolic risk factorsdetermined were: hypercalciuria in 41%, hypocitraturia in 30%, hyperoxaluria in 14%, hyperuricosuria in 10%, and cystinuria in 5%.Among the group, 81% of the patients had kidney stones, 6.5% had ureter stones, and 2.5% had bladder stones. Furthermore, itwas determined that 45% of the stones were composed of calcium oxalate, 35% had calcium phosphate stones, 14.2% had uricacid stones, and 13.3% had cystine stones. In 52% of the cases, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was performed, and 71%underwent surgical treatment.Conclusion: Metabolic evaluation and stone analysis should be performed to prevent future recurrences in children with urinarystone disease and lifelong follow-up should be emphasized.

🔖

Cite This Article

DAlKILINÇ, A., DEMİRKAN, H., ÖZÇELİK, G. (2019). Multidimensional Analysis of Urinary Stone Diseases in Pediatric Patients. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1, 46–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/363696

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Thomas SE, Stapleton FB. Urolithiasis in Children. In: Gonzales ET, Bauer SB, editors. Pediatric Urology Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1999. p. 607–19
  2. Kamoun A, Daudon M, Abdelmoula J, Hamzaoui M, Chaouachi B, Houissa T, et al. Urolithiasis in Tunisian children: a study of 120 cases based on stone composition. Pediatr Nephrol 1999;13:920–5
  3. Ozokutan BH, Küçükaydin M, Gündüz Z, Kabaklioğlu M, Okur H, Turan C. Urolithiasis in childhood. Pediatr Surg Int 2000;16:60–3
  4. Oner A, Demircin G, Ipekçioğlu H, Bülbül M, Ecin N. Etiological and clinical patterns of urolithiasis in Turkish children. Eur Urol 1997;31:453–8
  5. Sarkissian A, Babloyan A, Arikyants N, Hesse A, Blau N, Leumann E. Pediatric urolithiasis in Armenia: a study of 198 patients observed from 1991 to 1999. Pediatr Nephrol 2001;16:728–32
  6. Coward RJ, Peters CJ, Duffy PG, Corry D, Kellett MJ, Choong S, et al. Epidemiology of paediatric renal stone disease in the UK. Arch Dis Child 2003;88:962–5
  7. Alaya A, Nouri A, Najjar MF. Urolithiasis in Tunisian children: a study of 100 cases. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2009;20:1096–100
  8. Erbagci A, Erbagci AB, Yilmaz M, Yagci F, Tarakcioglu M, Yurtseven C, et al. Pediatric urolithiasis-evaluation of risk factors in 95 children. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2003;37:129–33
  9. Hoppe B, Kemper MJ. Diagnostic examination of the child with urolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis. Pediatr Nephrol 2010;25:403–13
  10. Alpay H, Ozen A, Gokce I, Biyikli N. Clinical and metabolic features of urolithiasis and microlithiasis in children. Pediatr Nephrol 2009;24:2203–9
  11. Daudon M, Jungers P. Drug-induced renal calculi: epidemiology, prevention and management. Drugs 2004;64:245–75
  12. Lenk S, Brien G, Bick C. Harnsteinbildung durch Dihydrotachysterolüberdosierung. Z Ärztl Fortbild 1976;70:470–1
  13. Pak CY, Sakhaee K, Hwang TI, Preminger GM, Harvey JA. Nephrolithiasis from calcium supplementation. J Urol 1987;137:1212–3
  14. VanDervoort K, Wiesen J, Frank R, Vento S, Crosby V, Chandra M, et al. Urolithiasis in pediatric patients: a single center study of incidence, clinical presentation and outcome. J Urol 2007;177:2300–5.