Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2012 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 4

Our percutaneous nephrolithotomy experiences: A single center experience with 533 patients

Perkütan nefrolitotomi deneyimlerimiz: 533 vakalık tek merkezdeki deneyimlerimiz

Pages
193–198
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: PNL method acceptable complication rate in the treatment of kidney Stones, can be administered safety and effectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate efficacy and morbidity of the treatment in total 533 patients underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Between November 2004 and December 2011, the records of 533 patients with renal calculi who underwent PCNL were reviewed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: PNL method acceptable complication rate in the treatment of kidney Stones, can be administered safety and effectively.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate efficacy and morbidity of the treatment in total 533 patients underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Material and Methods: Between November 2004 and December 2011, the records of 533 patients with renal calculi who underwent PCNL were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were evaluated with intravenous urography and/or computerized tomography. Patient related factors such as age, body mass index (BMI), ipsilateral history of SWL, PCNL and open surgery together with stone size and localization and degree of hydronephrosis were noted. Number and localization of access, blood transfusion requirement, success rate, length of hospitalization, intraoperative and postoperative complications and secondary procedures were reviewed. Results: The application of 533 PNL procedures, 226 women (%47.5), 280 men (%52.5), %47.5 right side, %52.5 left side, BMI 26.38 kg/$m^{2}$, mean stone volume 4196.64 $mm^{3}$ were determined. Before the PNL procedures, 134 patients were used ESWL(%25.1), open nephrolithotomy in 77 patients (%14.4), PNL 29 patients (%5.4) applied. 221 patients didn’t have hydronephrosis (%41.5), 312 patients had hydronephrosis (%58.5) was detected before the PNL procedures. 407 patients underwent singleport (%76.4), 2 ports with 86 patients (%16.1), 38 patients with 3 ports (%7.1), 1 patient was 4 port input. Balloon dilatator (%81.6), sequential dilatator (%17.8) were used. The mean of operation and fluoroscopy time 125.91 min and 6.1 min were detected. Perioperative complications occured in 39 patients (%7.1). Required blood transfusion in 81 patients (%15.2). Conclusion: PNL method acceptable complication rate in the treatment of kidney Stones, can be administered safety and effectively.

Özet

Amaç: Perkütan nefrolitotomi (PNL) yapılan toplam 533 hastada tedavinin etkinliğini ve morbiditesini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kasım 2004-Ocak 2012 tarihleri arasında böbrek taşı nedeniyle PNL yapılan 533 hastanın kayıtları geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Hastaların tamamı intravenöz ürografi ve/veya abdominopelvik tomografiyle değerlendirildi. Hastalar yaş, cinsiyet, taraf, vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ), aynı taraf açık cerrahi, PNL, ESWL hikayesi gibi hastayla ilişkili faktörler ile birlikte taş boyutu, taşın lokalizasyonu, hidronefroz derecesi, akses lokalizasyonu ve sayısı, operasyon ve floroskopi süreleri, intraoperatif ve postoperatif komplikasyonlar, kan transfüzyonu gereksinimi, başarı oranı, hastanede kalış süreleri ve ikincil tedavi gereksinimleri açısından değerlendirildi. Bulgular: 533 PNL uygulamasının 226sı bayan (%47.5), 280i erkek (%52.5), %47.5i sağ taraf, %52.5i sol taraf, VKİ 26.38 kg/$m^{2}$, ortalama taş hacmi 4196,64 $mm^{3}$ olarak tespit edildi. Operasyon öncesi 134 hastaya ESWL (%25.1), 77 hastaya açık nefrolitotomi (%14.4), 29 hastaya PNL (%5.4) uygulanmış. Operasyon öncesi 221 hastada hiç hidronefroz olmadığı (%41.5), 312 hastada (%58.5) hidronefroz olduğu tespit edildi. 407 hastaya tek port (%76.4), 86 hastaya 2 port (%16.1), 38 hastaya 3 port (%7.1), 1 hastaya 4 port giriş yapıldı. 435 hastaya balon dilatatör (%81.6), 95 hastaya sıralı dilatatör (%17.8) kullanıldı. 494 hastada perioperatif komplikasyon görülmedi (%92.9). 39 hastada perioperatif komplikasyon görüldü (%7.1). 81 hastada kan transfüzyonuna ihtiyaç duyuldu (%15.2). Ortalama operasyon ve floroskopi süreleri 125.91 dk ve 6.1 dk tespit edildi. Sonuç: PNL yöntemi böbrek taşlarının tedavisinde kabul edilebilir komplikasyon oranlarıyla etkili ve güvenli bir şekilde uygulanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞKIRAN, M., TANRIVERDİ, O., SARIOĞULLARI, U., BAYAR, G., ACINIKLI, H., HOROSANLI, K., KENDİRİCİ, M., MİROĞLU, C. (2012). Our percutaneous nephrolithotomy experiences: A single center experience with 533 patients. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 4, 193–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/363451

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Stoller ML: Urinary stone disease
  2. in Tanagho EA McAninch JW 17th edition Smith’s general urology, McGraw Hill Medical 2008 2. Akinci M, Esen T, Tellaloglu S Urinary stone disease in Turkey: An updated epidemiological study. Eur Urol 1991
  3. Tiselius HG, Alken P, Buck C, Galluci M, Knoll T, Sarica K, Türk C: Guidelines on urolithiasis, European Association of Urology, 2008, 4. Goodwin WE, Casey WC, Woolf W: Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis. J Am Med Assoc 1955
  4. Fernstrom I, Johansson B: Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976
  5. Snyder JA and Smith AD: Staghorn calculi: percutaneous extraction versus anatrophic nephrolithotomy. J Urol 1986
  6. Clayman RV, Castaneda-Zuniga WR: A guide to the percutaneous removal of renal and ureteral calculi
  7. Techniques in endourology. Dallas, Heritage Press, 1984 8. Ko R, Soucy F, Denstedt JD, Razvi H: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy made easier: A practical guide, tips and tricks. BJU Int 2008
  8. Netto NR Jr, Ikonomidis J, Ikari O, Claro JA: Comparative study of percutaneous access for stagSegura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, Williams HJ Jr, Barrett DM, Benson RC Jr, May GR, Bender CE: Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: Review of 1,000 cases. J Urol 1985
  9. Lingeman JE, Coury TA, Newman DM, Kahnoski RJ, Mertz JH, Mosbaugh PG, Steele RE, Woods JR: Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 1987
  10. 138 11. Wang D, Winfield H, Nakada SY, Kane CJ, L’Esparance JO, Monga M, Kozlowski PM: Controversial cases in endourology. J Endourol 2005 Oct
  11. 19(8):955-8. 12. Binbay M, Akman T, Kezer C, Özgör F, Erbin A, Özkuvancı U, Berberoğlu Y, Müslümanoğlu A.Y: Effect of pelvicalicieal system anatomy on success rate in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2010
  12. 9(6):605 13. Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, de la Rosette JJ: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its legacy. Eur Urol 2005
  13. Netto NR Jr, Ikonomidis J, Ikari O, Claro JA: Comparative study of percutaneous access for stagSegura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, Williams HJ Jr, Barrett DM, Benson RC Jr, May GR, Bender CE: Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: Review of 1,000 cases. J Urol 1985
  14. Munver R, Delvecchio FC, Newman GE et al: Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 2001
  15. Golijanin D, Katz R, Verstandig A et al