Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2019 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3

Minimally Invasive Open Surgical Approach and Outcomes for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Pages
247–251
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The minimally invasive open surgical approach for carpal tunnel syndrome (an average of 1 cm skin incision) is performed with local anesthesia and successful surgical outcomes are achieved.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The most common peripheral neuropathy is carpal tunnel syndrome.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We included 217 patients who were operated in our clinic for carpal tunnel syndrome by minimally invasive open surgical approach.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The minimally invasive open surgical approach for carpal tunnel syndrome (an average of 1 cm skin incision) is performed with local anesthesia and successful surgical outcomes are achieved.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: The most common peripheral neuropathy is carpal tunnel syndrome. The present study aims to describe our minimally invasive open surgical approach for carpal tunnel syndrome and evaluate surgical outcomes. Methods: We included 217 patients who were operated in our clinic for carpal tunnel syndrome by minimally invasive open surgical approach. Visual Analogue Scale and Functional Outcome Scale scores were obtained preoperative, postoperative at one month and three months to determine surgical outcomes. Results: The mean age of the patients was 55.4±12.8 years (32 to 69), 175 (80.6%) were women and 42 (19.4%) were men. The assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome’s etiology showed that 189 (%87.1%) of the cases were idiopathic, 19 (8.8%) had hypothyroidism, 5 (2.3%) had rheumatoid arthritis and 4 (1.8%) were due to pregnancy. The average improvement of VAS between preoperatively and late postoperatively was 5.41±1.05. The average improvement FOS was 17.44±3.06. They were statistically significant. Conclusion: The minimally invasive open surgical approach for carpal tunnel syndrome (an average of 1 cm skin incision) is performed with local anesthesia and successful surgical outcomes are achieved.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCE, İ., KAHYAOĞLU, O., ÇAVUŞOĞLU, H., AYDIN, Y. (2019). Minimally Invasive Open Surgical Approach and Outcomes for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3, 247–251. https://ajindex.com/articles/363426

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Heyman VB. Electrophysiological testing. In: Gelberman RH, editor. Operative nerve repair and reconstruction. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott; 1991. p. 170–81
  2. Szabo RM. Entrapment and compression neuropathies. In: Green DP, Hotchkiss RN and Pederson WC, editors. Green’s operative hand surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 1999. p. 1404–47
  3. D'Arcy CA, McGee S. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have carpal tunnel syndrome? JAMA 2000;283:3110–7
  4. Kerr CD, Gittins ME, Sybert DR. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: clinical results. Arthroscopy 1994;10:266–9
  5. Phalen GS. Reflections on 21 years' experience with the carpaltunnel syndrome. JAMA. 1970 25;212:1365–7
  6. Jacobsen MB, Rahme H. A prospective, randomized study with an independent observer comparing open carpal tunnel release with endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Br 1996;21:202–4
  7. Bromley GS. Minimal-incision open carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Am 1994:119–20
  8. Serra JM, Benito JR, Monner J. Carpal tunnel release with short incision. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:129–35
  9. Kluge W, Simpson RG, Nicol AC. Late complications after open carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Br 1996;:205–7
  10. MacDonald RI, Lichtman DM, Hanlon JJ, Wilson JN. Complications of surgical release for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 1978;3:70–6
  11. Chow JC. Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament for carpal tunnel syndrome: 22-month clinical result. Arthroscopy 1990;6:288– 96
  12. Cobb TK, Amadio PC. Reoperation for carpal tunnel syndrome. Hand Clin 1996;313–23
  13. Lindley SG, Kleinert JM. Prevalence of anatomic variations encountered in elective carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 2003;849–55
  14. Lee WP, Strickland JW. Safe carpal tunnel release via a limited palmar incision. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:418–24
  15. Yercan HS, Özalp T, Çoşkunol E, Özdemir O. Chow tekniği ile endoskopik karpal tünel gevşetilmesi orta dönem sonuçları. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2004: 15:1–6
  16. Lee H, Jackson TA. Carpal tunnel release through a limited skin incision under direct visualization using a new instrument, the carposcope. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:313–9
  17. Tetik C, Erol B: Karpal tünel sendromunun cerrahi tedavisinde uygulanan alternatif metodların karşılaştırılması. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2002; 13: 5–9 18. Wong KC, Hung LK, Ho PC, Wong JM. Carpal tunnel release. A prospective, randomised study of endoscopic versus limitedo