SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tanısal ve Girişimsel Radyoloji (Yeni Adı: Dİagnostic & Intervent. Radiol) / 2003 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Staging of urinary bladder tumors with CT and MRI

Mesane kanserlerinin BT ve MRG ile evrelendirilmesi

İlkay AKMANGİT
Hatice LAKADAMYALI
Aytekin OTO
Haluk ÖZEN
Okan AKHAN
Aytekin BESİM
Pages
63–69
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The superiority is more definite especially in early stage tumors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of spiral CT and MRI in patients with bladder tumor.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study included 32 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The superiority is more definite especially in early stage tumors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lenf düğümü çıkartılması · Mesane neoplazmları · Duyarlılık ve özgüllük

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of spiral CT and MRI in patients with bladder tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, patients with suspected urinary bladder tumor were evaluated by abdominal CT and MRI. This study included 32 patients. In 23 cases, transurethral resection (TUR), and in 9 cases radical cystectomy was performed. Additionally, pelvic lymph node dissection was performed in 9 patients. RESULTS: According to the pathological results of TUR-performed patients; the accuracy of spiral CT and MRI in preoperative staging of bladder tumors was 41.6% and 83.3%, respectively. The accuracy of spiral CT and MRI in preoperative staging of bladder tumors were 66.6% and 77.7% in patients who underwent radical cystectomy. Pelvic lymph node involvement was evaluated properly with MRI and CT. CONCLUSION: In the preoperative staging of bladder tumors, MRI is superior to CT. The superiority is more definite especially in early stage tumors.

Özet

AMAÇ Bu çalışmanın amacı mesane kanserlerinin evrelendirilmesinde BT ve MRG'nin yerinin araştırılmasıdır. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM Bu çalışmada hastanemiz üroloji bölümünde klinik olarak mesane kanseri şüphesi olan hastalar transüretral rezeksiyon (TUR) öncesi tüm abdomen BT ve MRG incelemesi yapılmıştır. Toplam 32 hasta çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Olguların 23 tanesine TUR, 9 tanesine radikal sistektomi uygulanmıştır. Ayrıca 9 hastaya pelvik lenf nodu diseksiyonu yapılmıştır. BULGULAR Patolojik tanısı TUR ile konan hastaların evrelendirilmesinde, BT ile MRG'nin doğruluk oranları sırasıyla %41.6 ve %83.3'tür. Patolojik tanısı radikal sistektomi ile konan hastaların evrelendirilmesinde, BT ile MRG'nin doğruluk oranları sırasıyla %66.6 and %77.7'dir. Pelvik lenf nodu diseksiyonu yapılarak kesin patolojik incelemesi yapılan hastaların MRG ve BT tamamını doğru evrelendirilmiştir. SONUÇ Mesane kanserlerinin evrelendirilmesinde MRG, BT'den daha üstün bir yöntemdir. Özellikle erken evre tümörlerde bu üstünlük daha belirgin olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKMANGİT, İ., LAKADAMYALI, H., OTO, A., ÖZEN, H., AKHAN, O., BESİM, A. (2003). Staging of urinary bladder tumors with CT and MRI. Tanısal ve Girişimsel Radyoloji (Yeni Adı: Dİagnostic & Intervent. Radiol), Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 63–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/363236

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Cancer Facts and Figures. American Cancer Society, Inc, 1997; 142-158
  2. Boring CC, Squires TS, Tang T, et al. Cancer statistics. Cancer J Clin 1995; 452-10
  3. International Union Against Cancer (UICC) In Sobin LH, Wittekind C, eds. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 5. edition. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1997
  4. Yaman Ö, Baltac› N, Ar›kan E, et al. Staging with computed tomography, transrectal ultrasonography and transurethral resection of bladder tumour: comparison with final pathological stage in invasive bladder carcinoma. Brit J Urol 1996; 78:197-200
  5. Amendola MA, Glazer GA, Grossman HB. Staging of bladder carcinoma: MRICT-surgical correlation. AJR 1986; 146: 1179-1183
  6. Vock P, Haertel M, Fuchs WA, et al. Computed tomography in staging carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Br J Radiol 1982; 4: 104-115
  7. Tachibana M, Baba S, Deguchi N, et al. Efficacy of gadolinium-diethylene-triaminepentaacetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation between superficial and musde invasive tumor of the bladder: a comperative study with computerized tomography and transurethral ultrasonography. J Urol 1991; 145:1169-1173
  8. Fisher MR, Hricak H, Crooks LE. Urinary bladder MR imaging: Part I. Normal and benign conditions. Radiology 1985; 157: 467-470
  9. Tanimoto A, Yuasa Y, Imai Y, et al. Bladder tumor staging: comparison of conventional and gadolinium enhanced dynamic MR imaging and CT. Radiology 1992; 185:741-747
  10. Kim B, Semelka SC, Ascher SM, et al. Bladder tumor staging: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, T1 and T2-weighted MR imaging, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced imaging, and late-gadolinium enhanced imaging. Radiology 1994; 193:239-245
  11. Barentsz OJ, Ruijs HJ, Strijk PS. The role of MR Imaging in carcinoma of the urinary bladder. AJR 1993; 160:937-947
  12. Neuerberg JM, Bohndorf K, Sohn M, et al. Urinary bladder neoplasms: evaluation with contrast enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 172:739-743
  13. Tavares NJ, Demas BE, Hricak H. MR imaging of bladder neoplasms: correlation with pathologic staging. Urol Radiol 1990; 12:27-33
  14. Husband JE, Olliff JFC, Williams MP, et al. Bladder cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 173:435- 440
  15. Lee JKT, Heiken JP, Ling D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal and pelvic lymphadenopathy. Radiology 1984; 153:181.