Journals / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Results of Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide and Topotecan Protocol in Refractory/Relapsed Pediatric Solid Tumors: A Single-center Experience

Pages
197–202
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Myelosuppression was the primary dose limiting toxicity.Conclusion: We concluded that VTC has a clinically tolerable but non-satisfactory effect on relapsed/refractory solid tumors in children.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Despite dramatic progress in the treatment of pediatric solid tumors in the last 3 decades, confronting a relapsed or refractory patient is still challenging.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We report our experience of refractory/relapsed pediatric solid tumor patients treated with vincristin + topotecan + cyclophosphamide (VTC) as a salvage therapy.Materials and Methods: Eleven refractory/relapsed patients (5 neuroblastoma, 4 Ewing’s sarcoma, 1 rhabdomyosarcoma and 1 osteosarcoma) who were given VTC as a salvage therapy were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Myelosuppression was the primary dose limiting toxicity.Conclusion: We concluded that VTC has a clinically tolerable but non-satisfactory effect on relapsed/refractory solid tumors in children.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: Despite dramatic progress in the treatment of pediatric solid tumors in the last 3 decades, confronting a relapsed or refractory patient is still challenging. We report our experience of refractory/relapsed pediatric solid tumor patients treated with vincristin + topotecan + cyclophosphamide (VTC) as a salvage therapy.Materials and Methods: Eleven refractory/relapsed patients (5 neuroblastoma, 4 Ewing’s sarcoma, 1 rhabdomyosarcoma and 1 osteosarcoma) who were given VTC as a salvage therapy were evaluated. All of them were metastatic at diagnosis and received appropriate initial chemotherapy. VTC consisted of vincristin (1.5 mg/m2 on day 1), cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2/day with mesna, on days 1 and 2) and topotecan (1 mg/m2/day on days 1, 2 and 3).Results: Eleven patients received a total of 53 courses of VTC with a median of 4 (range: 2-14). Median age at diagnosis was 12 years. One patient achieved complete response, 6 patients had stable disease, and 4 patients had progressive disease after 2 courses of VTC. The median survival duration was 28 months after diagnosis while it was 16 months after relapse. The median survival duration after first VTC was 5 months (2-21 months). Myelosuppression was the primary dose limiting toxicity.Conclusion: We concluded that VTC has a clinically tolerable but non-satisfactory effect on relapsed/refractory solid tumors in children.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRSOY, U., ÇORAPÇIOĞLU, F., KARADOĞAN, M. (2019). Results of Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide and Topotecan Protocol in Refractory/Relapsed Pediatric Solid Tumors: A Single-center Experience. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 197–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/363018

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Takimoto CH, Kieffer LV, Kieffer ME, Arbuck SG, Wright J. DNA topoisomerase I poisons. Cancer Chemother Biol Response Modif 1999;18:81-124
  2. Takimoto CH, Arbuck SG. Clinical status and optimal use of topotecan. Oncology (Williston Park) 1997;11:1635-46
  3. Kaufmann SH, Peereboom D, Buckwalter CA, et al. Cytotoxic effects of topotecan combined with various anticancer agents in human cancer cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:734-41
  4. Janss AJ, Cnaan A, Zhao H, et al. Synergistic cytotoxicity of topoisomerase I inhibitors with alkylating agents and etoposide in human brain tumor cell lines. Anticancer Drugs 1998;9:641-52
  5. Saylors RL 3rd, Stine KC, Sullivan J, et al. Cyclophosphamide plus topotecan in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors: A Pediatric Oncology Group phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3463-9
  6. Hunold A, Weddeling N, Paulussen M, Ranft A, Liebscher C, Jürgens H. Topotecan and cyclophosphamide in patients with refractory or relapsed Ewing tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2006;47:795-800
  7. London WB, Frantz CN, Campbell LA, et al. Phase II randomized comparison of topotecan plus cyclophosphamide versus topotecan alone in children with recurrent or refractory neuroblastoma: A Children’s Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:3808-15
  8. Farhat R, Raad R, Khoury NJ, et al. Cyclophosphamide and topotecan as first-line salvage therapy in patients with relapsed ewing sarcoma at a single institution. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2013;35:356-60
  9. Ashraf K, Shaikh F, Gibson P, Baruchel S, Irwin MS. Treatment with topotecan plus cyclophosphamide in children with first relapse of neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2013;60:1636-41
  10. Blanchette P, Hogg D, Ferguson P, et al. Topotecan and cyclophosphamide in adults with relapsed sarcoma. Sarcoma 2012;2012:749067
  11. Kano Y, Ohnuma T, Okano T, Holland JF. Effects of vincristine in combination with methotrexate and other antitumor agents in human acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells in culture. Cancer Res 1988;48:351-6
  12. Thompson J, George EO, Poquette CA, et al. Synergy of topotecan in combination with vincristine for treatment of pediatric solid tumor xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:3617-31
  13. Kebudi R, Cakir FB, Gorgun O, Agaoglu FY, Darendeliler E. A modified protocol with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide for recurrent/progressive ewing sarcoma family tumors. Pediatr Hemat Oncol 2013;30:170-7
  14. Saylors RL 3rd, Stewart CF, Zamboni WC, et al. Phase I stud