Journals / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Pediatric Liver Transplantation Outcomes for Metabolic and Non-metabolic Diseases in Turkey: A Single Center Experience

Pages
115–120
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, LT is an alternativetreatment option for some metabolic diseases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Liver transplantation (LT) is performed for several indications in the pediatric population, including malignancy and acute hepatic failureamong others.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our studies aim is to compare the post-transplant outcomesof those patients with metabolic and other liver diseases in our transplant program.Materials and Methods: One hundred eighty-nine patients who underwent LT between 1997 and 2015 due to metabolic diseases and acute orchronic liver failure were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, LT is an alternativetreatment option for some metabolic diseases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: Liver transplantation (LT) is performed for several indications in the pediatric population, including malignancy and acute hepatic failureamong others. LT has become an important treatment alternative for metabolic diseases. In most pediatric transplant centers, metabolicliver disease is the second most common indication for LT after biliary atresia. Our studies aim is to compare the post-transplant outcomesof those patients with metabolic and other liver diseases in our transplant program.Materials and Methods: One hundred eighty-nine patients who underwent LT between 1997 and 2015 due to metabolic diseases and acute orchronic liver failure were included in the study. This study was performed retrospectively.Results: We enrolled 189 patients in our study. 54% (n=102) male and 46% (n=87) female patients were included in the study. The metabolicdisease group included 56 patients and the non-metabolic disease group contained 133 patients. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasisis the most common disease among metabolic diseases resulting in LT and Wilson disease is the second most common. Post-transplantimmunosuppression was similar for both groups. There was no difference in both groups regarding the onset of post-transplant complicationsfor graft type or recipient age. Biliary and portal vein complications were most particularly defined in the group with non-metabolic diseases.There was no significant difference in survival between the two groups.Conclusion: LT is an important treatment option for acute hepatic failure and end-stage liver diseases. In addition, LT is an alternativetreatment option for some metabolic diseases.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKOYUN, M., CANDA, E., KIZILCAN, S., ERGÜN, O., KILIÇ, M., ÇETİN, F., AYDOĞDU, S. (2019). Pediatric Liver Transplantation Outcomes for Metabolic and Non-metabolic Diseases in Turkey: A Single Center Experience. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 115–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/362886

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Peeters PM, Sieders E, De Jong KP, et al. Comparison of outcome after pediatric liver transplantation for metabolic diseases and biliaryy atresia. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2001;11:28-35
  2. Barshes NR, Lee TC, Balkrishnan R, Karpen SJ, Carter BA, Goss JA. Orthotopic liver transplantation for biliaryy atresia: The U.S. experience. Liver Transpl 2005;11:1193-200
  3. Murray KF, Carithers RL Jr; AASLD. AASLD practice guidelines: Evaluation of thepatient for liver transplantation. Hepatology 2005;41:1407-32
  4. Jaffe R. Liver transplant pathology in pediatric metabolic disorders. Pediatr Dev Pathol 1998;1:102-17
  5. Meyburg J, Hoffmann GF. Liver transplantation for inborn errors of metabolism. Transplantation 2005;80:135-7
  6. Nolkemper D, Kemper MJ, Burdelski M, et al. Long-term results of pre-emptive liver transplantation in primary hyperoxaluria Type I. Pediatr Transplant 2000;4:177-81
  7. Shneider BL. Pediatric liver transplantation in metabolic disease: Clinical decision making. Pediatr Transplant 2002;6:25-9
  8. Burdelski M, Rogiers X. Liver transplantation in metabolic disorders. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 1999;62:300-5
  9. Iwatsuki S, Shaw BW Jr, Starzl TE. Liver transplantation for biliaryy atresia. World J Surg 1984;8:51-6
  10. Devictor D, Tissieres P; Bicêtre hospital pediatric transplant group. Pediatric liver transplantation: Where do we stand? Where we are going to? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;7:629-41
  11. McDiarmid SV, Anand R, Martz K, Millis MJ, Mazariegos G. A multivariate analysis of pre-, peri-, and posttransplant factors affecting outcome after pediatric liver transplantation. Ann Surg 2011;254:145-54
  12. Burdelski M, Nolkemper D, Ganschow R, et al. Liver transplantation in children: Long-term outcome and quality of life. Eur J Pediatr 1999;158:34-42
  13. Jain A, Mazariegos G, Kashyap R, et al. Pediatric liver transplantation. A single center experience spanning 20 years. Transplantation 2002;73:941-7
  14. Martin SR, Atkison P, Anand R, Lindblad AS; SPLIT research group. Studies of pediatric liver transplantation 2002: Patient and graft survival and rejection in pediatric recipients of a first liver transplant in the United States and Canada. Pediatr Transplant 2004;8:273-83
  15. Kayler LK, Merion RM, Lee S, et al. Long-term survival after liver transplantation in children with metabolic disorders. Pediatr Transplant 2002;6:295-300
  16. Morioka D, Kasahara M, Takada Y, et al. Living donor liver transplantation for pediatric patients w