Journals / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Psychometric Properties of a Turkish Version of the Nomophobia Scale for the Nine-Eighteen Age Group

Pages
316–322
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the factor coefficient was over 0.30, and the fit indices were over 0.90.Conclusion: The Turkish version of the NMP-Q is reliable and valid for the 9-18 age group

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: As a situational phobia, nomophobia is the fear experienced in the absence of a cell phone.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For data analysis, theShapiro-Wilk normality test, Content Validity index, Pearson correlation analysis, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, confirmatory factor analysis,explanatory factor analysis, and t-tests were used.Results: This study included 818 voluntary child participants.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the factor coefficient was over 0.30, and the fit indices were over 0.90.Conclusion: The Turkish version of the NMP-Q is reliable and valid for the 9-18 age group
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: As a situational phobia, nomophobia is the fear experienced in the absence of a cell phone. Nomophobia leads to situations that negativelyaffect children’s health. The aim of this study is to conduct validity and reliability studies for the Turkish version of the Nomophobia scale.Materials and Methods: The study was conducted with volunteer students from three secondary schools and two high schools whose parents’approval was acquired. Expert opinions, a pilot study, and a calculation of validity and reliability stages were applied. For data analysis, theShapiro-Wilk normality test, Content Validity index, Pearson correlation analysis, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, confirmatory factor analysis,explanatory factor analysis, and t-tests were used.Results: This study included 818 voluntary child participants. Of the participants, 56.7% were girls. In all, 91.5% of the participating childrenwere connected to the Internet on their mobile phones, and 67.2% had their own computer. The age range of participants was 9-18 years, andtheir average age was 14.1±2.32 years. The scale accounts for 57.8% of the total variance. Cronbach’s alpha for the whole scale was identified as0.90. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the factor coefficient was over 0.30, and the fit indices were over 0.90.Conclusion: The Turkish version of the NMP-Q is reliable and valid for the 9-18 age group

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, E. Z., BEKTAŞ, M. (2020). Psychometric Properties of a Turkish Version of the Nomophobia Scale for the Nine-Eighteen Age Group. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 316–322. https://ajindex.com/articles/362880

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Turkish Statistical Institute. Household Information Technology Usage Survey 2016- 2018. Retrieved from: http://www.tuik.gov. tr/ Access Date: December 18,2018
  2. Salehan M, Negahban A. Social networking on smartphones: When mobile phones become addictive. Comput Human Behav 2013; 29:2632-9
  3. Turkish Statistical Institute. 06-15 Age Group Use of Information Technologies in Children and Media 2013 2018. Retrieved from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ Access Date: December 18,2018
  4. Choi JS, Park SM, Roh MS, et al. Dysfunctional inhibitory control and impulsivity in Internet addiction. Psychiatry Res 2014; 215:424-8
  5. King ALS, Valença AM, Silva AC, Baczynski T, Carhalvo MR, Nardi AE. Nomophobia: Dependency on virtual environments or social phobia? Comput Human Behav 2013; 29:140-4
  6. Yildirim C, Correia AP. Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire. Comput Human Behav 2015; 49:130-7
  7. Bragazzi NL, Del Puente G. A proposal for including nomophobia in the new DSM-V. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2014; 7:155-60
  8. Mura G, Topcu-Uzer Ç, Erdur-Baker Ö, Diamantini D. A CrossCountry Perspective on Cyber Bullying: Italian and Turkish Experience. Mersin Univ J Educ Fac 2017; 13:80-93
  9. Cirilli E, Nicolini P. Digital skills and profile of each generation: a review. Int J Dev Educ Psychol Rev INFAD Psicol 2019; 3:487-94
  10. Garrick B, Pendergast D, Geelan D. Through the Lens of Generational Theory. In: Theorising Personalised Education, 6th ed. Singapore, Springer Publication 2017; 47-60
  11. Bennett S, Maton K, Kervin L. The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. Br J Educ Technol 2008; 39:775- 86
  12. Velički D, Dumančić M, Topolovčan T. The Net Generation, the Internet, and Political Communication and Participation. Croat J Educ 2017; 19:237-66
  13. Sahin S, Ozdemir K, Unsal A, Temiz N. Evaluation of mobile phone addiction level and sleep quality in university students. Pakistan J Med Sci 2013; 29:913-8
  14. Sencan H. Validity and Reliability in Social and Behavioral Measurements, 1st ed. Ankara, Seckin Publishing 2005; 355-407
  15. Misirli ZA, Akbulut Y. Development of a Scale to Explore Technology Literacy Skills of Turkish 8th Graders. Contemp Educ Technol 2013; 4:249-62
  16. Yildirim C, Correia AP. Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire. Comput Human Behav 2015; 49:130-7
  17. Yildirim C, Sumuer E, Adnan M, Yildirim S. A