Journals / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Brain Developmental Differences Between Preterm-born Twins and Singletons: A Multi-modal MRI Study

Pages
276–285
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The structural and functional differences collectively indicated that preterm-born twins may have delayed brain development compared with gestational age-matched singletons at term-equivalent age, which may be related to perinatal-neonatal problems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Twin studies allow for the investigation of genetic and environmental influences on human brain development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Brain volumes from 3D T1-weighted images, quantitative metrics and structural connectivity from diffusion tensor imaging, and low-frequency brain activity and functional connectivity from resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) were obtained from these neonates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The structural and functional differences collectively indicated that preterm-born twins may have delayed brain development compared with gestational age-matched singletons at term-equivalent age, which may be related to perinatal-neonatal problems.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: Twin studies allow for the investigation of genetic and environmental influences on human brain development. The generalizability of their findings depends on the developmental similarity between twins and singletons. This study aimed to evaluate the structural and functional differences in a cohort of preterm-born twins and singletons at term-equivalent age. Materials and Methods: Eighteen twins and forty-seven singletons were included and scanned at the term-equivalent age. Brain volumes from 3D T1-weighted images, quantitative metrics and structural connectivity from diffusion tensor imaging, and low-frequency brain activity and functional connectivity from resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) were obtained from these neonates. Results: We found no significant volumetric differences after multiple comparison correction. The diffusivity values in the cingulum cingular part, cingulate gyrus, lateral fronto-orbital gyrus, gyrus rectus, as well as medial fronto-orbital gyrus were significantly higher in the twin group than in the singleton group. Structural connectivity analysis showed higher transitivity in the twin group compared to the singletons, indicating increased local connectivity. For rs-fMRI, the twin group showed greater fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF) values in the salience network and several fronto-temporal regions compared with the singleton group. It is worth noting that we found differences both in structural and functional measurements (MD and fALFF) in the prefrontal and cingulate cortex. Conclusion: The structural and functional differences collectively indicated that preterm-born twins may have delayed brain development compared with gestational age-matched singletons at term-equivalent age, which may be related to perinatal-neonatal problems.

🔖

Cite This Article

LİU, T., ZHANG, H., YOU, Y., ZHENG, W., ZHAO, Z., LİU, T., SU, X., TİAN, F., ZHANG, Y., WU, D. (2021). Brain Developmental Differences Between Preterm-born Twins and Singletons: A Multi-modal MRI Study. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 276–285. https://ajindex.com/articles/362860

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Baare WF, Hulshoff Pol HE, Boomsma DI, et al. Quantitative genetic modeling of variation in human brain morphology. Cereb Cortex 2001; 11:816-24
  2. Brun CC, Lepore N, Pennec X, et al. Mapping the regional influence of genetics on brain structure variability--a tensor- based morphometry study. Neuroimage 2009; 48:37-49
  3. Hulshoff Pol HE, Schnack HG, Posthuma D, et al. Genetic contributions to human brain morphology and intelligence. J Neurosci 2006; 26:10235-42
  4. Peper JS, Schnack HG, Brouwer RM, et al. Heritability of regional and global brain structure at the onset of puberty: a magnetic resonance imaging study in 9-year-old twin pairs. Hum Brain Mapp 2009; 30:2184-96
  5. Maggioni E, Squarcina L, Dusi N, Diwadkar VA, Brambilla P. Twin MRI studies on genetic and environmental determinants of brain morphology and function in the early lifespan. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2020; 109:139-49
  6. Bryan SM, Hindmarsh PC. Normal and abnormal fetal growth. Horm Res 2006; 65(Suppl 3):19-27
  7. Ounsted M, Ounsted C. Maternal regulation of intra-uterine growth. Nature 1966; 212:995-7
  8. Hall JG. Twinning. Lancet 2003; 362:735-43
  9. Hulshoff Pol HE, Posthuma D, Baare WF, et al. Twin-singleton differences in brain structure using structural equation modelling. Brain 2002; 125:384-90
  10. Knickmeyer RC, Kang C, Woolson S, et al. Twin-singleton differences in neonatal brain structure. Twin Res Hum Genet 2011; 14:268-76
  11. Ordaz SJ, Lenroot RK, Wallace GL, et al. Are there differences in brain morphometry between twins and unrelated singletons? A pediatric MRI study. Genes Brain Behav 2010; 9:288-95
  12. Sadeghi N, Gilmore JH, Gerig G. Twin-singleton developmental study of brain white matter anatomy. Hum Brain Mapp 2017; 38:1009-24
  13. Ombelet W, Martens G, De Sutter P, et al. Perinatal outcome of 12,021 singleton and 3108 twin births after non-IVF-assisted reproduction: a cohort study. Hum Reprod 2006; 21:1025-32
  14. Muhlhausler BS, Hancock SN, Bloomfield FH, Harding R. Are twins growth restricted? Pediatr Res 2011; 70:117-22
  15. Mori S, Wu D, Ceritoglu C, et al. MRICloud: delivering high- throughput mri neuroinformatics as cloud-based software as a service. Comput Sci Eng 2016; 18:21-35
  16. Otsuka Y, Chang L, Kawasaki Y, et al. A multi-atlas label fusion tool for neonatal brain mri parcellation and quantification. J Neuroimaging 2019; 29:431-9
  17. Woods RP, Grafton ST, Holmes CJ, Cherry SR, Mazziotta JC. Automated image registration: I. General methods and in