Journals / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

The Results of Simulation Training in Pediatric Nursing Students’ Education

Pages
194–200
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In this study, the simulation training was beneficial, and students’ clinical application skill achievements improved

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Simulation training that started with low realistic models in health education has developed in recent years and is now widely used in medicine and nursing education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted with 57 “third-year” students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In this study, the simulation training was beneficial, and students’ clinical application skill achievements improved
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: Simulation training that started with low realistic models in health education has developed in recent years and is now widely used in medicine and nursing education. The purpose of the present research is to compare nursing students’ knowledge, skills, stress and anxiety during pediatric practices and to determine the students’ satisfaction and confidence levels related to the use of simulation. Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted with 57 “third-year” students. The students were assigned to experimental (n=23) and control (n=34) groups. To collect the study data, a Student Information Form, Student’s Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning scale, Simulation Design scale, Educational Practices Questionnaire, Clinical Stress Questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Nursing Care Knowledge Assessment Form for Children Suffering a Respiratory disease and Nursing Care Skill Assessment Form for Children Suffering a Respiratory disease were used. While the students in the experimental group had simulation training about Nursing Care of Child Suffering a Respiratory disease, the students in the control group were trained with traditional education methods. The students in both groups were observed while they gave care in the hospital environment. Results: Clinical stress, state-trait anxiety and clinical skill scores of the students in the experimental group were higher than the control group. Simulation training contributed to the development of their self-confidence positively. Conclusion: In this study, the simulation training was beneficial, and students’ clinical application skill achievements improved

🔖

Cite This Article

SARI, H. Y., ÖZTORNACI, B. Ö., AKGÜL, E. A., KARAKUL, A., DOĞAN, Z., DOĞAN, P. (2018). The Results of Simulation Training in Pediatric Nursing Students’ Education. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 194–200. https://ajindex.com/articles/362810

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Cant RP, Cooper SJ. Simulation-based learning in nurse education: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2010;66:3-15.
  2. Kapucu S, Bulut H. Turkish nursing students’ views of their clinical learning environment: a focus group study. Pak J Med Sci 2011;27:1149-53.
  3. Jroundi I, Mahraoui C, Benmessaoud R, et al. Risk factors for a poor outcome among children admitted with clinically severe pneumonia to a university hospital in Rabat, Morocco. Int J Infect Dis 2014;28:164-70.
  4. Tanır G, Aytekin C. Çocuklarda alt solunum yolu enfeksiyonları. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi 2001;10:382-5.
  5. Le Roux DM, Myer L, Nicol MP, Zar HJ. Incidence and severity of childhood pneumonia in the first year of life in a South African birth cohort: the Drakenstein child health study. Lancet Glob Health 2015;3:95-103. World Health Organization WHO Causes of child mortality. 2015; http://www.who.int/gho/child_health/mortality/causes/ en/ Accessed 20 July 2017.
  6. Wang H, Liddell CA, Coates MM, et al. Global, regional, and national levels of neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality during 1990-2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014;384:957-79.
  7. Craver R, Springer J, Begue R. Infections in a children’s hospital autopsy population. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 2014;33:135-44.
  8. Cantrell MA, Meakim C, Cash K. Development and evaluation of three pediatric-based clinical simulation. Clin Simul Nurs 2008;4:21-8.
  9. Sigalet E, Donnon T, Grant V. Undergraduate students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward a simulation-based ınterprofessional curriculum. The KidSIM Attitudes Questionnaire. Simul Healthc 2012;7:353-8.
  10. LeFlore JL, Anderson M, Zielke MA, et al. Can a virtual patient trainer teach student nurses how to save lives-teaching nursing students about pediatric respiratory diseases. Simul Healthc 2012;7:10-7.
  11. Dowson A, Russ S, Sevdalis N, Cooper M, De Munter C. How in situ simulation affects paeditric nurses’ clinical confidence. Br J Nurs 2013;22:610-7.
  12. Kang KA, Kim S, Kim SJ, Oh J, Lee M. Comparison of knowledge, confidence in skill performance (CSP) and satisfaction in problem-based learning (PBL) and simulation with PBL educational modalities in caring for children with bronchiolitis. Nurse Educ Today 2015;35:315-21.
  13. Jeffries PR, Rizzolo MA. Designing and implementing models for the innovative use of simulation to teach nursing care of ill adults and children: a national, multi-site, multi-method study. National League for Nursing and Laerdal Medical, New York, 2006. Unver V