Journals / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Pediatric Dentist-Pediatrician Cooperation in Early Diagnosis of Congenital Tooth Agenesis

Pages
88–93
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study is to draw attention to pediatric dentist-pediatrician cooperationin the early diagnosis of congenital tooth agenesis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Early diagnosis of congenital tooth agenesis increases the quality of treatment options and the final success of the treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Late diagnosis reduces the number of appropriatetreatments, increases the cost of treatment and may lead to possible complications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study is to draw attention to pediatric dentist-pediatrician cooperationin the early diagnosis of congenital tooth agenesis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Early diagnosis of congenital tooth agenesis increases the quality of treatment options and the final success of the treatment. However, insome clinical conditions, overlooking this diagnosis causes late diagnosis of these anomalies. Late diagnosis reduces the number of appropriatetreatments, increases the cost of treatment and may lead to possible complications. In the diagnosis of congenital tooth agenesis, findingsduring the routine medical examination of the pediatric patient are beneficial. At this point, as well as pediatric dentists, pediatricians alsoplay a great role in early diagnosis of these anomalies. The aim of this study is to draw attention to pediatric dentist-pediatrician cooperationin the early diagnosis of congenital tooth agenesis.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİREL, A., SARI, Ş. (2019). Pediatric Dentist-Pediatrician Cooperation in Early Diagnosis of Congenital Tooth Agenesis. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 88–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/362770

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Borie E, Fuentes R, Beltran V. Multiple tooth agenesis in nonsyndromic patient: a rare case report. Int J Morphol 2012;30:634- 6
  2. Nirmala S, Gokhale N, Sivakumar N, Quadar MA. Agenesis of multiple primary teeth and. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013;6:55-7
  3. Shimizu T, Maeda T. Prevalence and genetic basis of tooth agenesis. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2009;45:52-8
  4. Santos LL. Treatment planning in the presence of congenitally absent second premolars: a review of the literature. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002;27:13-7
  5. Fines CD, Rebellato J, Saiar M. Congenitally missing mandibular second premolar: Treatment outcome with orthodontic space closure. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:676-82
  6. Robinson S, Chan MF. New teeth from old: treatment options for retained primary teeth. Br Dent J 2009;207:315-20
  7. Ngan P, Heinrichs D, Hodnett S. Early management of congenitally missing mandibular second premolars: a review. Hong Kong Dent J 2011;8:40-5
  8. Sarı Ş, Bezgin T, Demirel A. Congenital agenesis of mandibular 2nd premolar teeth and treatment options. İçinde: Özdiler E (ed). Güncel bilgiler ışığında ortodonti, 1th ed. Ankara, Gümüş Kitabevi 2015;397-430
  9. Larmour CJ, Mossey PA, Thind BS, Forgie AH, Stirrups DR. Hypodontia-a retrospective review of prevalence and etiology. Part I. Quintessence Int 2005;36:263-70
  10. Kramer PF, Feldens CA, Ferreira SH, Spiguel MH, Feldens EG. Dental anomalies and associated factors in 2- to 5-year-old Brazilian children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008;18:434-40
  11. Rosenzweig KA, Garbarski D. Numerical aberrations in the permanent teeth of grade school children in Jerusalem. Am J Phys Anthropol 1965;23:277-83
  12. Kositbowornchai S, Keinprasit C, Poomat N. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in pretreatment orthodontic Thai patients. Khon Kaen Uni Dent J 2010;13:92-100
  13. Sümer AP, Akça T, Köprülü H. Dental anomalies in children: panoramic radiographic evaluation. Ondokuz Mayıs Univ Diş Hekim Fak Derg 2004;5:81-4
  14. Tunç EŞ, Koyutürk AE. Prevalence of congenitally missing permanent teeth in blacksea region children. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2006;16:37-40
  15. Altug-Atac AT, Erdem D. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:510-4
  16. Sisman Y, Uysal T, Gelgor IE. Hypodontia. Does the prevalence and distribution pattern differ in orthodontic patients? Eur J Dent 2007;1:167-73
  17. Sökücü O, Ünal M, Topçuoğlu T, Öztaş N. The incidence of hy