SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Journal of Pediatric Research / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Positioning on Adaptation to Spontaneous Breathing in Premature Infants After Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Funda GÜLER
Hüsniye ÇALIŞIR
Pages
102–109
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, positioning was not found to affect respiratory rate.Conclusion: There was no effect of positioning on the adaptation to spontaneous breathing in premature infants after weaning from mechanicalventilation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To determine the effects of positioning on the adaptation to spontaneous breathing in premature infants after weaning from mechanicalventilation.Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled experimental study was conducted with 60 (study group=30; control group=30) prematureinfants in the neonatal intensive care unit.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The infants in the study group and the control group were in a prone position and a supine position,respectively, during the first 120 minutes when spontaneous breathing started after they were weaned from mechanical ventilation.Results: There were significant intragroup differences in mean heart rate between repeated measurements at different time points.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, positioning was not found to affect respiratory rate.Conclusion: There was no effect of positioning on the adaptation to spontaneous breathing in premature infants after weaning from mechanicalventilation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: To determine the effects of positioning on the adaptation to spontaneous breathing in premature infants after weaning from mechanicalventilation.Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled experimental study was conducted with 60 (study group=30; control group=30) prematureinfants in the neonatal intensive care unit. The infants in the study group and the control group were in a prone position and a supine position,respectively, during the first 120 minutes when spontaneous breathing started after they were weaned from mechanical ventilation.Results: There were significant intragroup differences in mean heart rate between repeated measurements at different time points. Thedifferences were not found to be due to positioning. The mean SpO2 was higher in the study group than in the control group, although thedifference was not significant. This finding suggested that positioning did not have an influence on SpO2. Two infants in the control group failedto maintain spontaneous breathing. Although the study group had a significantly higher respiratory rate than the control group, the differencewas not significant. Therefore, positioning was not found to affect respiratory rate.Conclusion: There was no effect of positioning on the adaptation to spontaneous breathing in premature infants after weaning from mechanicalventilation.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLER, F., ÇALIŞIR, H. (2020). The Effect of Positioning on Adaptation to Spontaneous Breathing in Premature Infants After Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of Pediatric Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 102–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/362714

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Keller A, Arbel N, Merlob P, Davidson S. Neurobehavioral and autonomic effects of hammock positioning in infants with very low birth weight. Pediatr Phys Ther 2003;15:3-7
  2. Bhat RY, Hannam S, Pressler R, Rafferty GF, Peacock JL,Greenough A. Effect of prone and supine position on sleep, apneas, and arousal in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2006;118:101-7
  3. Park J, Thoyre S, Knafl GJ, Hodges EA, Nix WB. Efficacy of semi elevated side-lying positioning during bottle-feeding of very preterm infants: a pilot study. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2014;28:69–79
  4. Alinejad-Naeini M, Mohagheghi P, Peyrovi H, Mehran A. The effect of facilitated tucking during endotracheal suctioning on procedural pain in preterm neonates: a randomized controlled crossover study. Glob J Health Sci 2014;6:278–84
  5. Cândia MF, Osaku EF, Leite MA, et al. Influence of prone positioning on premature newborn infant stress assessed by means of salivary cortisol measurement: pilot study. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2014;26:169–75
  6. Chang YJ, Anderson GC, Lin CH. Effects of prone and supine positions on sleep state and stress responses in mechanically ventilated preterm infants during the first postnatal week. J Adv Nurs 2002;40:161–9
  7. Grenier IR, Bigsby R, Vergara ER, Lester BM. Comparison of motor self-regulatory and stress behaviors of preterm infants across body positions. Am J Occup Ther 2003;57:289–97
  8. Peng NH, Chen LL, Li TC, Smith M, Chang YS, Huang LC. The effect of positioning on preterm infants’ sleep-wake states and stress behaviors during exposure to environmental stressors. J Child Health Care 2014;18:314–25
  9. Monterosso L, Kristjanson L, Cole J. Neuromotor development and the physiologic effects of positioning in very low birth weight infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2002;31:138–46
  10. Blair PS, Sidebotham P, Berry PJ, Evans M, Fleming PJ. Major epidemiological changes in sudden infant death syndrome: A 20-year population-based study in the UK. Lancet 2006;367:314–9
  11. Li DK, Petitti DB, Willinger M, et al. Infant sleeping position and the risk of sudden infant death syndrome in California, 1997–2000. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:446–55
  12. Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, Moon RY. SIDS and other sleep-related infant deaths: expansion of recommendations for a safe infant sleeping environment. Pediatrics 2011;128:e1341–67
  13. American Academy of Pediatrics. Changing concepts of sudden infant death syndrome: implications for infant sleeping environment and