Journals / The Journal of Breast Health / 2017 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

University Students’ Awareness of Breast and Cervical Cancers: A Comparison of Two Countries and Two Different Cultures

Pages
77–82
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A greater number of Polish students only knew using oral contraceptive as a risk factor; the dif- ference was not statistically significant.Conclusion: Results of this study showed that breast and cervix cancer awareness is similar among university students in both countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: ftis study aims to evaluate Turkish and Polish female university students’ awareness of breast and cervical cancers. fte study was con- ducted in Turkey and Poland with 350 female students.Materials and Methods: ftis descriptive and cross-sectional study’s data were collected using Self-Administered Form questioning students' sociodemographic characteristics and awareness of breast and cervical cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were analysed using SPSS version 16.0 for Windows with number, percentage, and chi square test.Results: According to the findings, a significant difference was found between Turkish and Polish students on knowing and applying Breast Self- Exam (BSE) (p<0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A greater number of Polish students only knew using oral contraceptive as a risk factor; the dif- ference was not statistically significant.Conclusion: Results of this study showed that breast and cervix cancer awareness is similar among university students in both countries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: ftis study aims to evaluate Turkish and Polish female university students’ awareness of breast and cervical cancers. fte study was con- ducted in Turkey and Poland with 350 female students.Materials and Methods: ftis descriptive and cross-sectional study’s data were collected using Self-Administered Form questioning students' sociodemographic characteristics and awareness of breast and cervical cancer. Data were analysed using SPSS version 16.0 for Windows with number, percentage, and chi square test.Results: According to the findings, a significant difference was found between Turkish and Polish students on knowing and applying Breast Self- Exam (BSE) (p<0.05). No difference was found between the two student groups on considering mammography as required. 81.1% of Turkish and 68.1% of Polish students considered Clinical Breast Examination (CBE) as required; the difference was significant. A significantly higher number of Turkish students knew high-fat diet, overweight, first childbirth at advanced ages, and not having given birth as risk factors, while a higher number of Polish students knew using oral contraceptive as risk factor for breast cancer. A significantly higher number of Turkish students knew cancer history in family, Human Papilloma Virus, smoking, immunodeficiency, overweight, three or more full-term pregnancies, the first pregnancy at advanced ages, and poverty as risk factors for cervical cancer. A greater number of Polish students only knew using oral contraceptive as a risk factor; the dif- ference was not statistically significant.Conclusion: Results of this study showed that breast and cervix cancer awareness is similar among university students in both countries.

🔖

Cite This Article

RIZALAR, S., AVCI, İ. A., ZOLADKIEWICZ, P., ALTAY, B., MORACZEWSKA, I. (2017). University Students’ Awareness of Breast and Cervical Cancers: A Comparison of Two Countries and Two Different Cultures. The Journal of Breast Health, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 77–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/362641

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Re- beloM, ParkinDM, Forman D, Bray F. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon. Available from: URL: http://globocan.iarc.fr
  2. Karadag G, Gungormus Z, Surucu R, Savas E, Bicer F. Awareness and Practices Regarding Breast and Cervical Cancer among Turkish Women in Gazientep. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014; 15:1093-1098. [CrossRef] Bora Başara B, Güler C, Yentür GK, Birge B, Pulgat E, Mamak Ekinci B. T.C. Health Ministery Turkey’s Statistical Yearbook 2012, Ankara; 2013: 34. Available from: URL: http://eco.iarc.fr/eucan/CancerOne.aspx?Cancer= 46&Gender=2 Gozüm S, Aydin I. Validation evidence for Turkish adaptation of cham- pion’s health belief model scales. Cancer Nurs 2004; 27:491-498. (PMID: 15632789) Çam O, Babacan Gümüş A. Meme ve serviks kanserinde erken tanı davranışlarını etkileyen psikososyal faktörler. Ege University Nursing School Journal 2006; 22:81-93.
  3. Ozdemir O, Bilgili N. Knowledge and practices of nurses working in an education hospital on early diagnosis of breast and cervix cancers. TAF Prev Med Bull 2010; 9:605-612. [CrossRef] Aydin Avci I, Kumcagiz H, Altinel B, Caloglu A.Turkish Female Acade- mician Self-Esteem and Health Beliefs for Breast Cancer Screening Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014; 15:155-160.
  4. Secginli S (2011). Breast cancer screening: What are the last changes? TAF Prev Med Bull 2011; 10:193-200. [CrossRef] Ersin F, Bahar Z. Effects of health promotion models on breast cancer early detection behaviors: A literature review. Dokuz Eylül University Nursing School Journal 2012; 5:28-38.
  5. Kanbur A, Çapık C. Cervical Cancer Prevention, Early Diagnosis-Screen- ing Methods and Midwives / Nurses Role. Hacettepe University Health Science Faculty Nursing Journal 2011; 61-72.
  6. Sogukpinar N, Karaca Saydam B, Ozturk Can H, Hadımlı A, Bozkurt OD, Yucel U, Kocak YC, Akmese ZB, Demir D, Ceber E, Ozenturk G. Assessment of cervical cancer risk in women between 15 and 49 years of age: Case of Izmir. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013; 14:2119-2125. [CrossRef ] American Cancer Society. Cervical Cancer Prevention and Early Detec- tion. Available from: URL: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/cid/docu- ments/webcontent/003167-pdf.pdf Erişim: 3.2.2016.
  7. Blake SC, Andes K, Hilb L, Gaska K, Chien L, Flowers L, Adams EK. Facilitators and Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, and En- rollment i