Journals / The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

An analysis of preoperative sonographic findings and fine-needle aspiration biopsy results of thyroidectomy cases

Pages
1–8
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Risk factors of thyroid malignancy should also be considered when assessing FNAB results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to compare the preoperative sonographic findings, fine-needle aspiration biopsy FNAB and postoperative histopathological results in patients who underwent total thyroidectomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: A total of 884 patients 199 males, 685 females; mean age 46.8±12.7 years; range, 16 to 82 years who underwent total thyroidectomy were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Risk factors of thyroid malignancy should also be considered when assessing FNAB results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biopsy · consistency · malignancy

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to compare the preoperative sonographic findings, fine-needle aspiration biopsy FNAB and postoperative histopathological results in patients who underwent total thyroidectomy. Patients and Methods: A total of 884 patients 199 males, 685 females; mean age 46.8±12.7 years; range, 16 to 82 years who underwent total thyroidectomy were included. Thyroid ultrasonography was performed in all patients with an initial diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Sonographic findings of thyroid nodules were evaluated. The sonographic characteristics were the number of nodules and sizes, having microcalcifications, having irregular margins and echogenicity. Sonographic malignancy scores were calculated due to sonographic findings. All thyroidectomy specimens were sent for pathological evaluation. The specimens were divided into two groups as benign and malignant groups, due to pathological evaluation. Groups were compared in terms of preoperative sonographic findings, FNAB and postoperative histopathological results. Results: The sonographic malignancy scores were statistically higher in malignant group than in benign group p=0.001 . Nodule size was smaller in malignant group than in benign group p=0.001 . Capsule irregularity rate was statistically higher in malignant group than in benign group p=0.001 . Hypoechogenicity rate was statistically higher in malignant group than in benign group p=0.001 . There was a statistically significant consistency between pathology and FNAB results kappa=0.478, p=0.001 . The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values of FNAB were 55.7%, 92.4%, 72.5% and 82.9%, respectively. Conclusion: Although the thyroid FNAB has acceptable sensitivity and specificity, it is not effective alone in establishing a decision of operation. Risk factors of thyroid malignancy should also be considered when assessing FNAB results.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEŞ, S., ŞAHBAZ, N. A., AKARSU, C., ÇELİK, M., OLGUN, M., DURAL, A. C., SAYIN, İ. (2019). An analysis of preoperative sonographic findings and fine-needle aspiration biopsy results of thyroidectomy cases. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/362575

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Morris LG, Sikora AG, Tosteson TD, Davies L. The increasing incidence of thyroid cancer: the influence of access to care. Thyroid 2013;23:885-91.
  2. Udelsman R, Zhang Y. The epidemic of thyroid cancer in the United States: the role of endocrinologists and ultrasounds. Thyroid 2014;24:472-9. Haugen BR. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: What is new and what has changed? Cancer 2017;123:372-81.
  3. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016;26:1-133.
  4. Brito JP, Gionfriddo MR, Al Nofal A, Boehmer KR, Leppin AL, Reading C, et al. The accuracy of thyroid nodule ultrasound to predict thyroid cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014;99:1253-63.
  5. Guth S, Theune U, Aberle J, Galach A, Bamberger CM. Very high prevalence of thyroid nodules detected by high frequency (13 MHz) ultrasound examination. Eur J Clin Invest 2009;39:699-706.
  6. Tan GH, Gharib H. Thyroid incidentalomas: management approaches to nonpalpable nodules discovered incidentally on thyroid imaging. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:226-31.
  7. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64:9-29.
  8. Davies L, Welch HG. Current thyroid cancer trends in the United States. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;140:317-22.
  9. Leenhardt L, Bernier MO, Boin-Pineau MH, Conte Devolx B, Maréchaud R, Niccoli-Sire P, et al. Advances in diagnostic practices affect thyroid cancer incidence in France. Eur J Endocrinol 2004;150:133-9.
  10. Brito JP, Al Nofal A, Montori VM, Hay ID, Morris JC. The Impact of Subclinical Disease and Mechanism of Detection on the Rise in Thyroid Cancer Incidence: A Population-Based Study in Olmsted County, Minnesota During 1935 Through 2012. Thyroid 2015;25:999-1007.
  11. Mohammadi A, Hajizadeh T. Evaluation of diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound scoring system to select thyroid nodules requiring fine needle aspiration biopsy. Int J Clin Exp Med 2013;6:641-8.
  12. Kim KM, Park JB, Kang SJ, Bae KS. Ultrasonographic guideline for thyroid nodules cytology: single institute experience. J Korean Surg Soc 2013;84:73-9.
  13. Cheng PW, Chou HW, Wang CT, Lo WC, Liao LJ. Evaluation and development of a real-