Journals / The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

Surgical treatment of hypopharyngeal cancer

Pages
105–111
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The relationship between sex and hypopharyngeal subsite was statistically significant p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to evaluate our department’s approach to the treatment of hypopharyngeal tumors, the features of the tumors, the survival analyses and to present our results in the light of the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: Eighty-one hypopharyngeal tumor patients and four patients with undefined primary origin, those patients with undefined origin have tumors that infiltrate both hypopharynx and cervical esophagus, totally 85 patients 56 males, 29 females; mean age 54.6±13.4 years; range, 23 to 81 years who underwent surgical treatment, were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The relationship between sex and hypopharyngeal subsite was statistically significant p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Esophageal reconstruction · hypopharynx cancer · organ preservation surgery

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate our department’s approach to the treatment of hypopharyngeal tumors, the features of the tumors, the survival analyses and to present our results in the light of the literature. Patients and Methods: Eighty-one hypopharyngeal tumor patients and four patients with undefined primary origin, those patients with undefined origin have tumors that infiltrate both hypopharynx and cervical esophagus, totally 85 patients 56 males, 29 females; mean age 54.6±13.4 years; range, 23 to 81 years who underwent surgical treatment, were included in this study. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, and treatment protocols were recorded retrospectively. Results: Patients were classified on the primary subsite of the hypopharynx: 51% originated from the sinus piriformis, 29% from the postcricoid area, 15% from the posterior wall of the pharynx and only 5% from the cervical esophagus. The relationship between sex and hypopharyngeal subsite was statistically significant p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEŞ, S., BAŞARAN, B., ASLAN, İ., KIYAK, Ö. E. (2018). Surgical treatment of hypopharyngeal cancer. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 105–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/362559

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Gourin CG, Terris DJ. Carcinoma of the hypopharynx. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2004;13:81-98.
  2. Cooper JS, Porter K, Mallin K, Hoffman HT, Weber RS, Ang KK, et al. National Cancer Database report on cancer of the head and neck: 10-year update. Head Neck 2009;31:748-58.
  3. Popescu CR, Bertesteanu SV, Mirea D, Grigore R, lonescu D, Popescu B. The epidemiology of hypopharynx and cervical esophagus cancer. J Med Life 2010;3:396-401.
  4. Raghavan U, Quraishi S, Bradley PJ. Multiple primary tumors in patients diagnosed with hypopharyngeal cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;128:419-25.
  5. Kraus DH, Zelefsky MJ, Brock HAJ, Huo J, Harrison LB, Shah JP. Combined Surgery and Radiation Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;116:637-641.
  6. Iwae S, Fujii M, Hayashi R, Hasegawa Y, Fujii T, Okami K, et al. Matched-pair analysis of patients with advanced hypopharyngeal cancer: surgery versus concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Int J Clin Oncol 2017;22:1001-1008.
  7. Eckel HE, Staar S, Volling P, Sittel C, Damm M, Jungehuelsing M. Surgical treatment for hypopharynx carcinoma: feasibility, mortality, and results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;124:561-9.
  8. Sewnaik A, Hoorweg JJ, Knegt PP, Wieringa MH, van der Beek JM, Kerrebijn JD. Treatment of hypopharyngeal carcinoma: analysis of nationwide study in the Netherlands over a 10-year period. Clin Otolaryngol 2005;30:52-7.
  9. Gupta T, Chopra S, Agarwal JP, Laskar SG, D’cruz AK, Shrivastava SK, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx: single-institution outcome analysis of a large cohort of patients treated with primary non- surgical approaches. Acta Oncol 2009;48:541-48. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN. Guidelines Head and Neck Version 1.2015. Available at: www.nccn.org. Spector JG, Sessions DG, Haughey BH, Chao KS, Simpson J, El Mofty S, et al. Delayed regional metastases, distant metastases, and second primary malignancies in squamous cell carcinomas of the larynx and hypopharynx. Laryngoscope 2001;111:1079-87.
  10. Lefebvre JL, Chevalier D, Luboinski B, Kirkpatrick A, Collette L, Sahmoud T. Larynx preservation in pyriform sinus cancer: preliminary results of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase III trial. EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:890-9.
  11. Beauvillain C, Mahé M, Bourdin S, Peuvrel P, Bergerot P, Rivière A, et al. Final results of a randomized trial comparing chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with chemotherapy plus su