Journals / The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2008 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF THE CONTINUING EDUCATION CENTERS AT TURKISH UNIVERSITIES

Pages
138–148
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study it was discovered that these centers had very similar foundation principles and organizational structures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Continuing education centers mainly organize activities for the society in the fields that have gained importance on the improvement of individuals with a view of career building, improving professional knowledge and skills, achieving new skills and supplying individual development needs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data pertaining to structure and functions of the centers meeting this criterion, the number of which is 43 in total comprising 34 state and 9 private universities, have been evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study it was discovered that these centers had very similar foundation principles and organizational structures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Continuing education centers mainly organize activities for the society in the fields that have gained importance on the improvement of individuals with a view of career building, improving professional knowledge and skills, achieving new skills and supplying individual development needs. Such centers have been established within universities through the principle of making continuing education accessible to everyone as a starting point for a lifelong learning process. These centers which aim at providing continuing education, implement more flexible programs compared to those executed at higher education institutions. In this study, the structure and functions of Continuing Education Centers at Turkish Universities are investigated. The scope of the study includes all the centers that have web pages established under state and public universities in Turkey. Data pertaining to structure and functions of the centers meeting this criterion, the number of which is 43 in total comprising 34 state and 9 private universities, have been evaluated. As a result of the study it was discovered that these centers had very similar foundation principles and organizational structures.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, M. M. (2008). STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF THE CONTINUING EDUCATION CENTERS AT TURKISH UNIVERSITIES. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 138–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/362121

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Baykara, T. (2006). 21. Yüzyılda Teknoloji, Teknoloji Yönetimi ve Gelecek, Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu, Gebze 2006.
  2. Celik, G. (2007). University Continuing Education Units for Local Development: The Cose METU CEC. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Guruz, K. (2004). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Yüksek Ö¤retim, Öğrenci Seçme ve Yerleştirme Merkezi Yayınları, Ankara 2004.
  3. Hagston, Folk High Schools; An Important past of Adult Education in Sweden, June 2000. “Making a European Area of Lifelong Learning a Reality” Jallade, J, P (201). From Continuing Education to Lifelong Learning in French Universities’, European Journal of Education, vol.36, no.3, Blackwell Publishers Ltd, USA. Mark, R. (2006). The Development of Policy in LLL towards 2010, European University Lifelong Learning: The Managers’ Handbook EPublication EULLearN - the European University Lifelong Learning Network. Retrieved: March 12, 2007, www.eullearn. net. Mitchell, V 2001, A Policy for University Continuing Education, THENUCEEuropean Thematic Network in University Continuing Education. European Socrates Programme, Retrieved: February 15, 2007, from www.thenuce.net. Schild Hans-Joachim, (2002). “The White Paper on Youth and the lifelong learning strategy”, Coyote, No:6, Kasım 2002, s.23. Sem Bültenleri, Nisan-Haziran-Eylül 2006,
  4. Ankara.
  5. Siebert, H. (2003). Didaktisches Handeln in der Erwachsenenbildung. Didaktik aus konstruktivistischer Sicht Luchterhand Verlag”, 2003. Skolverket, “İsveç yetişkin eğitimi”, http://www.skolverket.se/sb/d/374/a/1218. Swedish Ministry of Education and Science, 2004, “The Development of Eucation National Report”. Ağustos 2004.
  6. Turkoglu, A. (1998). Dünya Ülkelerinden Örneklerle Karşılaştırmalı Eğitim, 1998.
  7. Urponen, H. (2006). Local Development in European Marginal Areas: Learning Sustainablity, European University Lifelong Learning The Managers Handbook EPublication Eullearn-the European University Lifelong Learning Network. Retrived: March 12, 2007, from www.eullearn.net. Ultanir, Emel ve Ultanir, Gürcan, (2006). “Estonya, İngiltere ve Türkiye’de Yetişkinler Eğitiminde Profesyonel Standartlar”, 2006.
  8. Yildiz, Ahmet, 2004, “Türkiye’deki Yetişkin Eğitimi Araştırmalarına Toplu Bir Bakış” Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, yıl: 2004, cilt: 37, sayı: 1 ss 78- 97. Yukselturk, E. 2005, “Online İnformation Technologien Certificate Program” Turkish Online Journaf of Distance Education -TOJDE, January 2005 ISSN 1302- 6488, vol, 6, no 1.