Journals / The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2008 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

CONDUCTING A TRIAL OF WEB CONFERENCING SOFTWARE: Why, How, and Perceptions from the Coalface

Pages
19–28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Preliminary findings indicate that web conferencing software enables teachers and students at the university to engage actively across diverse locations, supporting a student-centred approach and greater flexibility in terms of where, when and how students learn.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper reports on the trial of web conferencing software conducted at a regional Australian university with a significant distance population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This was followed by phase 2, a universitywide trial across disciplines.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Preliminary findings indicate that web conferencing software enables teachers and students at the university to engage actively across diverse locations, supporting a student-centred approach and greater flexibility in terms of where, when and how students learn.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper reports on the trial of web conferencing software conducted at a regional Australian university with a significant distance population. The paper shares preliminary findings, the views of participants and recommendations for future activity. To design and conduct the trial, an action research method was chosen because it is participative and grounded in experience, reflecting the context and objectives of the trial. In the first phase of the trial, students in postgraduate Education courses were linked across the globe to participate in interactive and collaborative conference activity and to communicate via audio, text, and video and shared whiteboard. Mathematical problem-solving was carried out collaboratively in an undergraduate course using tablet PCs. This was followed by phase 2, a universitywide trial across disciplines. Preliminary findings indicate that web conferencing software enables teachers and students at the university to engage actively across diverse locations, supporting a student-centred approach and greater flexibility in terms of where, when and how students learn. From these findings, the authors have made some initial recommendations to university management on the adoption of web conferencing to support learning and teaching.

🔖

Cite This Article

REUSHLE, S., LOCH, B. (2008). CONDUCTING A TRIAL OF WEB CONFERENCING SOFTWARE: Why, How, and Perceptions from the Coalface. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 19–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/362118

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Birch, D. & Volkov, M. (2005). Students' perceptions of compulsory asynchronous online discussion. Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC) Conference 2005: Broadening the Boundaries, 05-07
  2. December, Fremantle, Western Australia. Dalsgaard, C. (2006). Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems. European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning. Retrieved March 2, 2008, http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Christian_Dalsgaard.htm de Byl, P. & Taylor, J. A. (2007). A web 2.0/web3D hybrid platform for engaging students in e-learning environments. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(3). 108-127.
  3. Hafeez-Baig, A. & Danaher, P. A. (2007). Future possibilities for mobile learning technologies and applications at the University of Southern Queensland, Australia: Lessons from an academic focus group. 1st International Conference on Mobile Learning Technologies and Applications, 19 Feb., New Zealand: Auckland. Retrieved March 16, 2008, from http://eprints.usq.edu.au/2042
  4. Harman, C. & Dorman, M. (1998). Enriching distance teaching and learning of undergraduate mathematics using videoconferencing and audiographics, Distance Education, 19( 2), 299-318.
  5. Kulathuramaiyer, N. & Maurer, H. (2007). Current Development of Mashups in Shaping Web Applications. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007 (pp. 1172-1177).
  6. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Loch, B. & McDonald, C. (2007). Synchronous chat and electronic ink for distance support in mathematics, Innovate 3(3). Reushle, S. E. (2005). Inquiry into a transformative approach to professional development for online educators, doctoral thesis, USQ. Reushle, S. E. (2006). A framework for designing higher education e-learning environments. E-Learn 2006 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education, 13-17
  7. Oct., Hawaii: Honolulu. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from http://eprints.usq.edu.au/1226
  8. Rowe, S., Ellis, A., & Bao, T. Q. (2006). The evolution of audiographics: A case study of audiographics teaching in a business faculty. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ASCILITE conference: Who’s learning? Whose technology? Retrieved March 2, 2008, from www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p194.pdf Salmon, G. (2000). Learning submarines: Raising the periscopes. Retrieved January 18, 2008, from http://www.flexiblelearning.net.au/nw2000/main/key03.h