Journals / The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2008 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

DESIGNING MOTIVATIONAL LEARNING SYSTEMS IN DISTANCE EDUCATION

Pages
149–161
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, the empirical studies related with this subject and the suggestions for presenting more effective motivational instructional designs in distance learning are summarized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The designing of instruction, when considered as a process, is the determination of instructional requirements of the learner and development of functional learning systems in order to meet these requirements.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Among these theories the motivational design theory points out that instructional processes are required to be configured with the strategies which increases the attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction of the students for an instructional design which ensures the continuity of learning motivation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, the empirical studies related with this subject and the suggestions for presenting more effective motivational instructional designs in distance learning are summarized.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The designing of instruction, when considered as a process, is the determination of instructional requirements of the learner and development of functional learning systems in order to meet these requirements. In fact, as a consequence of studies on the development of effective learning systems some instructional design theories have emerged. Among these theories the motivational design theory points out that instructional processes are required to be configured with the strategies which increases the attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction of the students for an instructional design which ensures the continuity of learning motivation. The studies indicate that the systems which are developed on the basis of mentioned strategies raise the attention of the student during instruction, develop a relevance to the students’ requirements, create a positive expectation for success and help having a satisfaction by reinforcing success. In this article, the empirical studies related with this subject and the suggestions for presenting more effective motivational instructional designs in distance learning are summarized.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALABAN, J. S. (2008). DESIGNING MOTIVATIONAL LEARNING SYSTEMS IN DISTANCE EDUCATION. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 149–161. https://ajindex.com/articles/362112

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Chyung, S. Y. (2001). Conducting learner analysis to adjust online instruction for your faceless learners. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning (pp.85-90). Retrieved May 11, 2008 from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/01_6.pdf.
  2. Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Riegeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (pp. 383-434).
  3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Keller, J.M. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance & Instruction, 26(8), 1-7.
  4. Keller, J.M. (1999). Motivation in cyber learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1(1), 7-30.
  5. Keller, J. M., & Kopp, T. W. (1987). An application of the ARCS model of motivational design. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional theories in actions: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models (pp. 289-320).
  6. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (1988). Use of the ARCS motivational model in courseware design. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (pp. 401-434).
  7. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and e-Learning design: A mutinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), 229-239.
  8. Kim, C.M., & Keller, J.M. (2008). Effects of motivational and volitional email messages (MVEM) with personal messages on undergraduate students’ motivation, study habits and achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 36–51.
  9. Mills, R. J., & Sorensen, N. (2004). Kid’s CollegeTM 2004: An implementation of the ARCS model of motivational design. Retrieved March 10, 2008 from http://www.contentedits.com/img.asp?id=1706.
  10. Naime-Diefenbach, B. N. (1991). Validation of attention and confidence as independent components of the ARCS motivational model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State Univeristy, Tallahassee. Newby, T. (1991). Classroom motivation: Strategies of three fifth-grade teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 195-200.
  11. Nwagbara, C. I. (1993). Effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model of motivational design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University. Patronis, M. (2005). Motivational constructs in an online learning environment in a UAE University. Retrieved April 10, 2008 from http://www.admc.hct.ac.ae/emel2005/people/patronis/MP%20Paper2005.doc.
  12. Perrin, D.G. (2005). Creative onl