Journals / The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2008 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

STAKEHOLDERS PERCEPTIONS AND CONCERNS ON OPEN AND DISTANCE EDUCATION IN THE HIGHER INSTITUTIONS: The Case of Eastern Ethiopia

Pages
137–158
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Data were collected from the selected sample employing a questionnaire and an interview( which include open ended items) The results indicate that the nature of the tutorial services provided by tutors does not follow the fundamental principles of distance education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study attempt to examine the perception of stakeholders (Tutors & coordinators) in open and distance education with particular reference to the eastern region of Harargie.30 tutors and 10 program coordinators were consulted and considered as subjects of the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The tutorial programs were devoted largely to teachers’ verbal explanation of descriptive facts which is the typical feature of conventional face-to-face instruction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Data were collected from the selected sample employing a questionnaire and an interview( which include open ended items) The results indicate that the nature of the tutorial services provided by tutors does not follow the fundamental principles of distance education.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study attempt to examine the perception of stakeholders (Tutors & coordinators) in open and distance education with particular reference to the eastern region of Harargie.30 tutors and 10 program coordinators were consulted and considered as subjects of the study. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches were employed in the data treatment and analysis. Data were collected from the selected sample employing a questionnaire and an interview( which include open ended items) The results indicate that the nature of the tutorial services provided by tutors does not follow the fundamental principles of distance education. The tutorial programs were devoted largely to teachers’ verbal explanation of descriptive facts which is the typical feature of conventional face-to-face instruction. The late arrival of course modules to the students; the distribution of modules very close to the actual dates of the tutorial sessions; tutors’ reliance on the conventional face-to-face mode of instruction; large class size and the heavy workloads imposed upon tutors in some tutorial centers were some of the major constraints that caused the program to be implemented in an unsatisfactory way.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEYOUM, Y. (2008). STAKEHOLDERS PERCEPTIONS AND CONCERNS ON OPEN AND DISTANCE EDUCATION IN THE HIGHER INSTITUTIONS: The Case of Eastern Ethiopia. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 137–158. https://ajindex.com/articles/362103

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Bates, A. W. (1984). Broadcasting in education: An evaluation. London: Constable. Cavanaugh, C. (2005). “Distance Education Success Factors”. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(1), 1-6.
  2. Coggins, C. C. (1988). Preferred learning styles and their impact on completion of external degree programs. The American Journal of Distance Education, 2 (1). Daughterty, M., and Barbara L. F.(1998) University Faculty and student Perceptions of Web-based Instruction. Journal of Distance Education. Retrieved from: http://www.cade.athabascau.ca/vol3.1/daugherty.html Gagne. M, and Shephered, M. ( 2001). A comparison between a distance and traditional graduate accounting class.T.H.E journal 28(9). Retrieved From http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/A3433.cfm
  3. Gibbs, G., and Durbridge, N. (1976). Characteristics of Open University tutors. Teaching at a Distance, 7. Helland, K. (2002). Perception of Distance Learning and the Effects on Selection Decision. Retrieved from http://bus.utk.edu?iopsyc/pdf/Perception-of-Distance- Education-siop2003.pdf Holmberg, B. (1989). The concept, basic character, and development potentials of distance education. Distance Education, 10 (1), 127-135.
  4. Keegan, D. (1995). Distance education technology for the new millennium: compressed video teaching. ZIFF Papiere. Hagen, Germany: Institute for Research into Distance Education. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 389 931). Kember, D. A. (1989). “A Longitudinal – Process Model of Dropout from Distance Education”. Journal of Higher Education, 60 (3). Kerlinger, F. N. (1986).
  5. Foundation of behavioral Research, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc, USA. Kerwin, Michael et al (1999). Instructor and Student Attitudes Toward Distance Learning. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 23(1), pages 581-591
  6. Kikup, G. and C. von Prummer (1990). Support and Connectedness: The Needs of Women Distance Education Students. Journal of Distance Education. Retrieved from: http://cade.athabascau.ca/vol5.2/7_kirkup_and_von_prummer.html
  7. Koul, B. N. (1987). A study of Dropouts: Implications for Administrative and Educational Strategies. New Delhi, Unpublished paper. Marew, Z. (2002). The Impact of Globalization on Distance Education. The Ethiopian Journal of Educational researchers’ Association. Volume 1, No. 1. Moore, M. G. and Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance Education: A systems view. Belmont: Wads Worth Publishing Company. Ojo, O. D., and Olakulehin F. K. (2006), “Attitudes and Perc