Journals / The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2008 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

E-LEARNING IN ROMANIAN HIGHER EDUCATION: A study case

Pages
162–175
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Through the application of appropriate statistical methods, the research’ aim was to describe and assess to what extent computers are used for learning of the students in order to highlight any important differences in terms of gender, specialty, and the preferred form of learning for postgraduate courses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The accelerated development of the information and communication technologies determined universities, companies and educational institutions to implement alternatives to the traditional teaching methods, thereby leading to the development of e-courses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In Romania, issues connected to eLearning are comparatively little known, as there are no relevant studies regarding the present situation of eLearning use or of the ways of increasing the level of use of Information and Communication Technologies along with an increase in the efficiency of higher education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Through the application of appropriate statistical methods, the research’ aim was to describe and assess to what extent computers are used for learning of the students in order to highlight any important differences in terms of gender, specialty, and the preferred form of learning for postgraduate courses.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The accelerated development of the information and communication technologies determined universities, companies and educational institutions to implement alternatives to the traditional teaching methods, thereby leading to the development of e-courses. New Information and Communication Technologies mediating learning represent an important component of education and training systems. In Romania, issues connected to eLearning are comparatively little known, as there are no relevant studies regarding the present situation of eLearning use or of the ways of increasing the level of use of Information and Communication Technologies along with an increase in the efficiency of higher education. The purpose of the study is to explore the level of dissemination of eLearning in the Romanian higher education, regarding both awareness about eLearning as a model and actual participation in such courses, to assess the respondents’ opinion on eLearning, to analyze the perspectives of using elearning, and the students’ opinions concerning e-learning in comparison with traditional educational model. The paper reports the results of a research that was conducted in Iasi, at the "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University. Through the application of appropriate statistical methods, the research’ aim was to describe and assess to what extent computers are used for learning of the students in order to highlight any important differences in terms of gender, specialty, and the preferred form of learning for postgraduate courses.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASANDULUI, L., CEOBANU, C. (2008). E-LEARNING IN ROMANIAN HIGHER EDUCATION: A study case. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 162–175. https://ajindex.com/articles/362072

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Anon, (2001). Report on the European eLearning Summit 2001, 10-11
  2. May, IBM International Education Centre. Ceobanu, C., Asandului, L. & Gagea, M. (2006). “The Study of Educational Options in Economic Higher Education in an E - Learning Context, Using Statistical Methods” 3rd International Conference Regional Economic Cooperation in South Eastern Europe, Bankya, Bulgaria, pp. 527-536, ISBN-10:954-23-0327-0, ISBN- 13:978-954-23-0327-5.
  3. Crook, C. (2005). “Addressing research at the intersection of academic literacies and new technology”, International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 43, issues 7-8, 2005, http://www.sciencedirect.com/.
  4. Denman, B. (2001).
  5. Higher education in Europe, Issue XXVI, no. 1. Favretto, G., Caramia, G. & Guardini, M. (2005). “E-learning measurement of the learning differences between traditional lessons and online lessons”, European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, Issue 2005/II, www.eurodl.com Glass, G. V. & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and Psychology, Allyn and Bacon, N.Y. Hijazi, S., Bernard, P., Plaisent, M. & Maguiraga, L. (2003). “Interactive technology impact on quality distance education”, Electronic Journal of e- Learning, volume 1 Issue 1. Jaba, E. & Grama, A. (2004). Statistical analysis with SPSS in Windows, Polirom, Iaşi. Jenkins, M. & Hanson, J. (2003). E-Learning Series: A guide for Senior Managers, Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN) Generic Centre, United Kingdom, August 2003. Commission of the European Communities, (2002). Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council adopting a multi-annual programme (2004-2006) for the effective integration of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in education and training systems in Europe (eLearning Programme), Brussels. Commission of the European Communities, (2003). Decision No 2318/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. European Commission, E-Communications Household Survey, http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_249_en.pdf Les européens et les technologies de l’information et de la communication dans le cadre de l’emploi, http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_159_fr.pdf http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/education/policies/2010/doc/progress_towar ds_common_objectives_en.pdf http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/en/01/st05/05980en1.pdf http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/programmes/elearning/index_en.html