Journals / Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

THE DUTY OF LOYALTY OF MANAGEMENT BOARD MEMBERS

Pages
41–50
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall concept of duty of loyalty has a constraining function as to the managerial position of power.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The duty of loyalty in German company law requires managers and directors to act in the best interest of the firm.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The duty of loyalty was derived and later separated from the rather general notion of good faith.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall concept of duty of loyalty has a constraining function as to the managerial position of power.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The duty of loyalty in German company law requires managers and directors to act in the best interest of the firm. The duty of loyalty was derived and later separated from the rather general notion of good faith. Today, its basis of validity is the influence directors may exercise on the company. The overall concept of duty of loyalty has a constraining function as to the managerial position of power. This makes the duty of loyalty an important instrument of the internal corporate governance system. From a functional point of view, the duty of loyalty serves as a blanket clause that is indispensable for an evermore evolving body of law, as it allows for the necessary flexibility in the application of law. For instance, transactions of managers and directors with their enterprise (self dealing) have to be fair and appropriate and carried out at arm's length. A corporate opportunity must either fall within a firm's scope of business or must be allocated to the firm by concrete circumstances. Privately received information may constitute a corporate opportunity unless a director receives it by virtue of a personal friendship or from a family member.

🔖

Cite This Article

LIEDER, J. (2016). THE DUTY OF LOYALTY OF MANAGEMENT BOARD MEMBERS. Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 41–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/361458

References (8)

  1. Altmeppen, Holger & Roth, Günther H. (2015) Kommentar zum GmbHG, 8. Auflage, München, C.H.Beck. Baumbach, Adolf & Hueck, Alfred (2013) Kommentar zum GmbHG, 20. Auflage, München, C.H.Beck. Baumbach, Adolf & Hopt, Klaus J. (2014) Kommentar zum HGB, 36. Auflage, München, C.H. Beck. Bayer, Walter & Lieder, Jan (2005) "Darlehen der GmbH an Gesellschafter und Sicherheiten aus dem GmbH-Vermögen für Gesellschafterverbindlichkeiten" Zeitschrift für Unternehmens und Gesellschaftsrecht, S. 133-153.
  2. Bork, Reinhard & Schäfer, Carsten (2012) Kommentar zum GmbHG, 2. Auflage, Aachen, RWS Verlag Kommunikationsforum. Bürgers, Tobias & Körber, Torsten (2014) Kommentar zum AktG, 3. Auflage, Heidelberg, C.F. Müller. Cahn, Andreas (1998)
  3. Kapitalerhaltung im Konzern, Köln, Carl Heymanns. Cahn, Andreas (2013) 'Die Vertretung der Aktiengesellschaft durch den Aufsichtsrat', in: Festschrift für Michael Hoffmann-Becking, S. 247-281,
  4. München, C.H.Beck. Davies, Paul & Worthington, Sarah (2012), in: Gower/Davies, Principles of Modern Company Law, 9. Auflage, London, Sweet & Maxwell. Enriques, Luca & Hansmann, Henry B. & Kraakman, Reinier (2009) Kraakman et al. (Editors), The Anatomy of Corporate Law, 2. Auflage, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  5. Erman, Walter (2014) Kommentar zum BGB, 14. Auflage, Köln, Dr. Otto Schmidt. Farrar, John H. & Hannigan, Brenda (1998) Company Law, 4. Auflage, London, Butterworths Law. Fleck, Hans-Joachim (1991) 'Eigengeschäfte eines Aufsichtsratsmitgliedes' Festschrift Heinsius, S. 89-110,
  6. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter. Fleischer, Holger (2000) 'Informationspflichten der Geschäftsleiter beim Management Buyout im Schnittfeld von Vertrags-, Gesellschafts- und Kapitalmarktrecht' Die Aktiengesellschaft, S. 309-321.
  7. Fleischer, Holger (2002) 'Die,,Business Judgment Rule" im Spiegel von Rechtsvergleichung und Rechtsökonomie', Festschrift Wiedemann, 2002, S. 827-850,
  8. München, C.H. Beck. Fleischer, Holger (2003) 'Gelöste und ungelöste Probleme der gesellschaftsrechtlichen Geschäftschancenlehre' Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht, S. 985 - 992. Fleischer, Holger (2003),,Zur organschaftlichen Treuepflicht der Geschäftsleiter im Aktienund GmbH-Recht" Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Bankrecht, S. 1045 - 1058. Fleischer, Holger (2013) 'Die Geschäftschancenlehre im Recht der BGB-Gesellschaft' Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht, S. 361 - 367. Galoob, Stephen R. & Leib, Ethan J (2014) "Intentions, Compliance, and Fiduciary Obligations" Legal Theory, I: 02, V: 20, S. 1