Specifically, the paper is focused on: (i) In the organisational arrangements, developing the composition and functioning of the Board of directors; (ii) The status of directors, in particular, the requirements to be a director, ways of appointments, dismissal, remuneration, and liability.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper analyzes the regulation of directors of capital companies in Spain compared with the management model of joint stock companies followed by the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Spanish model and its legal solutions may serve to further reform of the rules of the management of joint stock companies in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Specifically, the paper is focused on: (i) In the organisational arrangements, developing the composition and functioning of the Board of directors; (ii) The status of directors, in particular, the requirements to be a director, ways of appointments, dismissal, remuneration, and liability.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
This paper analyzes the regulation of directors of capital companies in Spain compared with the management model of joint stock companies followed by the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102. The Spanish model and its legal solutions may serve to further reform of the rules of the management of joint stock companies in Turkey. Specifically, the paper is focused on: (i) In the organisational arrangements, developing the composition and functioning of the Board of directors; (ii) The status of directors, in particular, the requirements to be a director, ways of appointments, dismissal, remuneration, and liability.
🔖
Cite This Article
SERRANO, E. M. (2016). İSPANYA VE TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANONİM ORTAKLIKLARIN YÖNETİMİ. Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 53–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/361451