Journals / The European Research Journal / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Silent cerebral embolism after carotid endarterectomy: a two-center experience

Pages
188–195
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Even if these lesions are asymptomatic, we have to be rigorous to avoid microembolism during all stages during surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is considered the most effective treatment for stroke prevention in patients with critical carotid stenosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The incidence of new ischemic lesions ranges from 0% to 33% at diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) after CEA in previous studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Even if these lesions are asymptomatic, we have to be rigorous to avoid microembolism during all stages during surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:carotid endarterectomy · magnetic resonance imaging · cerebral embolism

Abstract

Objectives. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is considered the most effective treatment for stroke prevention in patients with critical carotid stenosis. The incidence of new ischemic lesions ranges from 0% to 33% at diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) after CEA in previous studies. We determined the rate of silent cerebral embolism in CEA patients by DW-MRI in this study. Methods. This study was conducted between January 2016 and April 2016 in two centers. Thirty-five consecutive patients (three with bilateral) with 38 CEAs were included in the study. There were no new postoperative symptoms in all patients. Preoperative and postoperative brain DW-MRIs were performed within one day preoperatively and second day postoperatively. Two DW-MRIs were screened and compared in terms of newly occurring lesions. Thus, we attempted to find the rate of silent cerebral embolism. Results. New brain lesions were detected in six (6/38 CEAs; 15.8%) cases with unilateral CEAs. All of these lesions were ischemic. In five cases, new lesions were located within the operated carotid artery territory (ipsilateral parietal lobe). However, in one case, a new lesion was located outside of the operated carotid artery territory (ipsilateral occipital lobe). Thirty-day morbidity and mortality rates were 0% and 2.85% (1/35), respectively. Conclusion. Silent cerebral embolisms may frequently occur during postoperative period in CEA patients. Even if these lesions are asymptomatic, we have to be rigorous to avoid microembolism during all stages during surgery.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖDE, S., YALVAC, S. D., AŞIK, M., AHMEDOV, F., ŞEN, O., ÖZ, K., ERKANLI, K. (2017). Silent cerebral embolism after carotid endarterectomy: a two-center experience. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 188–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/361176

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Fairhead JF, Rothwell PM. The need for urgency in identification and treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis is already established. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;19:355-8
  2. Walker MD, Marler JR, Goldstein M, Grady PA, Toole JF, Baker WH, et al. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1995;273:1421-8
  3. Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J, Peto C, Peto R, Potter J, et al; MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2004;363:1491-502
  4. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators; Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445-53
  5. Moore WS, Barnett HJ, Beebe HG, Bernstein EF, Brener BJ, Brott T, et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a multidisciplinary consensus statement from the ad hoc committee. American Heart Association. Stroke 1995;26:188-201
  6. Biller J, Feinberg WM, Castaldo JE, Whittemore AD, Harbaugh RE, Dempsey RJ, et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council. American Heart Association. Stroke 1998;29:554-62
  7. Cantelmo NL, Babikian VL, Samaraweera RN, Gordon JIC, Pochay VE, Winter ML. Cerebral microembolism and ischemic changes associated with carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:1024-31
  8. Jansen C, Ramos LM, van Heesewijk JP, Moll FL, van Gijn J, Ackerstaff RG. Impact of microembolism and hemodynamic changes in the brain during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 1994;25:992-7
  9. Muller M, Reiche W, Langenscheidt P, Hassfeld J, Hagen T. Ischemia after carotid endarterectomy: comparison between transcranial Doppler sonography and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:47-54
  10. Schroeder AP, Falk E. Vulnerable and dangerous coronary plaques. Atherosclerosis 1995;118:141-9
  11. Pasterkamp G, Schoneveld AH, van der Wal AC, Haudenschild CC, Clarijs RJ, Becker AE, et al. Relation of arterial geometry to luminal narrowing and histologic markers for plaque vulnerability: the remodeling paradox. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:655-62
  12. Kolodgie FD, Gold HK, Burke AP, Fowler DR, Kruth HS, Weber DK, et al. Intraplaque hemorrhage and p