Journals / The European Research Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Analysis of the cornea donor data: an eye bank study

Pages
30–35
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the present study, ECC, MCA, and SD levels were greater in younger donors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To analyse 1.5-year data of our newly established eye bank and to evaluate the factors affecting donor quality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our bank’s donor cornea data between July 2013 and November 2014 were retrospectively analysed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the present study, ECC, MCA, and SD levels were greater in younger donors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Eye bank · cornea · specular microscopy

Abstract

Objectives. To analyse 1.5-year data of our newly established eye bank and to evaluate the factors affecting donor quality. Methods. Our bank’s donor cornea data between July 2013 and November 2014 were retrospectively analysed. The effects of donor age, sex, and time from death to harvesting on the findings of specular microscopy were assessed. Results. A total of 139 corneas retrieved from 70 donors. The mean age of donors was 34.2±14.6 (5-64) years. The mean time from death to harvesting was 6.7±2.9 (1-13) hours; the mean time from collection to transplantation was 5.2±2.8 (1-14) days. Age had a significant negative correlation with mean endothelial cell count (ECC), a significant positive correlation between mean cell area (MCA) and standard deviation (SD). Time from death to harvesting had a significant negative correlation with cell count and 6A; it had a significant positive correlation with SD, the coefficient of variation, and MCA. Conclusion. According to the results of the present study, ECC, MCA, and SD levels were greater in younger donors. Endothelial morphology was altered as the time from death to harvesting was prolonged; however, the alteration in cell morphology was not severe enough to alter transplantation success with the corneas being harvested within the first 13 hours.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUFEKCİ, A. B., ÇEVİK, S. G., PARMAK, N., DUMAN, R., CEVİK, M. T., KAZANCI, B., ASLANCI, M. E., YÜCEL, E. (2016). Analysis of the cornea donor data: an eye bank study. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 30–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/361144

References (6)

  1. Thuret G, Chiquet C, Bernal F, Acquart S, Romanet JP, Mouillon M, et al. Prospective, randomized clinical and endothelial evaluation of 2 storage times for corneal donor tissue in organ culture at 31 degrees C. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Apr;121(4):442-50. Human organ and tissue transplantation. Report by the Secretariat. Executive Board, EB112/5; 112th Session, May 2003 http://apps.who.int/gb/archive/pdf_files/EB112/eeb1125.pdf. Access date; 2013 Sep 09. Oliva MS, Schottman T, Gulati M. Turning the tide of corneal blindness. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep-Oct;60(5):423-7. Turkiye Cumhuriyeti Saglik Bakanligi. Ankara: c201 2013Yılı Guncel Bekleme Listesi Hasta Istatistikleri. https://organ.saglik.gov.tr/web/Content.aspx?menu=%283%29guncel_bekleme_listesi. Access date: 2013 Sep 22. Turkiye Cumhuriyeti Saglik Bakanligi. Ankara: c2013 Organ ve Doku Dagitimi Istatistikleri. https://organ.saglik.gov.tr/web/Content.aspx?menu=%283%29organ_ve_doku_dagitimi_istatistikleri. Access date: 2013 Sep 09. Demirsoy N, Yilmaz A. Kornea transplantasyonunun tip, etik ve hukuk acisindan onemi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmology. 2012;21:171-83. European Eye Bank Association Directory. Minimum Medical Standards. Revision 1, 2013. http://www.europeaneyebanks.org/downloads/EEBA%20Minimum%20Medical%20Standards%20Rev%201%20-%202013Agreed.pdf. Access date: 2015 Dec 18. Eye Bank Association of America. Medical Standards. Washington, DC: EBAA; 2012. Eye Bank Association of America Medical Advisory Board. Medical standards. Washington, DC: Eye Bank Association of America; November 2008.
  2. Rao SK, Ranjan Sen P, Fogla R, Gangadharan S, Padmanabhan P, Badrinath SS. Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal Indianeyes. Cornea. 2000 Nov;19(6):820-3.
  3. Abib FC, Barreto J. Behavior of corneal endothelial densityover a lifetime. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Oct;27(10):1574-8. Reinhart WJ. Eye banking methods and standards. In Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ. Cornea. Fundamentals of cornea and external diseases. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997. P. 485-491.
  4. Grabska-Liberek I, Szaflik J, Brix-Warzecha M. The importance of various factors relating to the morphological quality of corneas used for PKP by the Warsaw Eye Bank from 1996 to 2002. Ann Transplant. 2003;8(2):26-31.
  5. Wilson RF, Roper-Hall MJ: Effect of age on the endothelial cell count in the normal eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 1982 Aug;66(8):513-5.
  6. Kozer L, Manav G, Sezen F, Akova Y. Yasa bagli kornea endotel degisimleri. T Oft Gaz. 1987;17:213-1