Journals / The European Research Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Is group diabetes education effective on hemoglobin A1c level?

Pages
193–198
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The school executed by a team consisting of specialists may reach a larger number of patients while the patients get the opportunity to repeat the sessions anytime they need.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Diabetes education decreases hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level by 1% in patients with diabetes mellitus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we aimed to evaluate efficacy of diabetes group education programme called diabetes school on glycemic control by comparing HbA1c levels of patients with diabetes mellitus measured before and after education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The school executed by a team consisting of specialists may reach a larger number of patients while the patients get the opportunity to repeat the sessions anytime they need.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:diabetes education · hemoglobin A1c · diabetes school

Abstract

Objectives. Diabetes education decreases hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level by 1% in patients with diabetes mellitus. In addition, education delays development or progression of complications by improving psychosocial, clinical, and behavioural aspects of diabetes mellitus, improves quality of life, modifies life style behaviours including healthy eating and regular exercise. In this study, we aimed to evaluate efficacy of diabetes group education programme called diabetes school on glycemic control by comparing HbA1c levels of patients with diabetes mellitus measured before and after education. Methods. Electronic medical records of patients with DM who were registered to diabetes school executed by endocrine units of two hospitals between 2015 and 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Diabetes school programme was composed of 90 minutes sessions a week for 4 consecutive weeks. Education sessions were executed in a didactic and interactive pattern. Results. The attendees (n = 65) had signicantly lower HbA1c levels after the education programme (before 9.09 ± 2.46%, after 7.88 ± 1.90%; p = 0.001) than the non-attendees (n = 41) (before 8.96 ± 2.35%, after 8.35 ± 2.00%; p = 0.091). Insulin users had significantly higher baseline HbA1c values and benefited more than non-insulin users (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The diabetes school education programme has positive impact on glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus. A large team may lessen the burden of education sessions on health specialists. The school executed by a team consisting of specialists may reach a larger number of patients while the patients get the opportunity to repeat the sessions anytime they need.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANSU, G. B., TAŞKIRAN, B., YORULMAZ, G., DOĞAN, H., DİNÇTÜRK, C. (2018). Is group diabetes education effective on hemoglobin A1c level?. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 193–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/361102

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Guiding principles for the care of people with or at risk for diabetes. National Diabetes Education Programme. 2014, USA
  2. Satman I, Yilmaz T, Sengül A, Salman S, Salman F, Uygur S, et al. Population-based study of diabetes and risk characteristics in Turkey: results of the Turkish diabetes epidemiology study (TURDEP). Diabetes Care 2002;25:1551-6
  3. Satman I, Omer B, Tutuncu Y, Kalaca S, Gedik S, Dinccag N, et al. Twelve-year trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes in Turkish adults. Eur J Epidemiol 2013;28:169-80
  4. Glycemic targets. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2017;40:S48-S56
  5. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet 2016;387:1513-30
  6. TC Sağlık Bakanlığı, Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu. Türkiye Diyabet Programı, 2015-2020. 2014, Ankara
  7. Duke SA, Colagiuri S, Colagiuri R. Individual patient education for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(1):CD005268
  8. TC Sağlık Bakanlığı, Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu. Erişkin diyabetli bireyler için eğitimci rehberi. 2014, Ankara
  9. Uluslarası Diyabet Federasyonu. Uluslarası Diyabet Eğitim standartları. 3rd ed. Istanbul: EOS Ajans Yayıncılık; 2009
  10. AADE 7™ Self-Care Behaviors. American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) Position Statement. Available at: www.diabeteseducator.org/docs/default-source/practice/practice-resources/position-statements/aade7-self-care-behaviors-position-statement.pdf?sfvrsn=6. Accessed August 4, 2017
  11. Lawal M, Lawal F. Individual versus group diabetes education: Assessing the evidence. J Diabetes Nurs 2016;20:247-50
  12. Davies MJ, Heller S, Skinner TC, Campbell MJ, Carey ME, Cradock S, et al. Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;336:491-5
  13. Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams RD. Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(2):CD003417. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;6:CD003417
  14. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management educat