Journals / The European Research Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Assessment of cyber abuse in sexually abused children and adolescents

Pages
58–67
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There is a great need to develop and evaluate interventions with those children and young people, particularly in sexually abused children and adolescents who are thought to be more vulnerable to cyber abuse.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Child sexual abuse is associated with adverse outcomes, including increased vulnerability, that may explain the risk of revictimization via cyber media and cyber abuse may be a risk factor for sexual abuse.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We assessed 75 children and adolescents aged 7-18 who had experienced sexual abuse and were referred to us between 01.01.2014-01.01.2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There is a great need to develop and evaluate interventions with those children and young people, particularly in sexually abused children and adolescents who are thought to be more vulnerable to cyber abuse.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:child · abuse · sexual

Abstract

Objectives: Child sexual abuse is associated with adverse outcomes, including increased vulnerability, that may explain the risk of revictimization via cyber media and cyber abuse may be a risk factor for sexual abuse. The aims of the study were to explore cyber abuse prevalence in sexual abuse cases, the direct and indirect links between child sexual abuse and cyber abuse and to study the differences in internet use between children and adolescents who were sexually abused and the control group. Methods: We assessed 75 children and adolescents aged 7-18 who had experienced sexual abuse and were referred to us between 01.01.2014-01.01.2015. Additionally, 45 typical developing subjects who did not have any abuse history were recruited from pediatrics clinic of or hospital as the control group. We used our semi-structured questionnaire to assess cyber abuse. Results: The rates of internet use were high in the control group (97.8%) compared to those of sexually abused teens (82.7%). However, the rates of cyber abuse were similar between the groups. The most used web site/application was different between the groups. Facebook was the most used web site/application in the sexually abused group (69.4%). This ratio was only 20.5% in the control group. Conclusions: We assessed cyber abuse in a population exposed to sexual abuse. As several authors have previously emphasized, the implementation of preventative steps is essential. There is a great need to develop and evaluate interventions with those children and young people, particularly in sexually abused children and adolescents who are thought to be more vulnerable to cyber abuse.

🔖

Cite This Article

UYTUN, M. Ç., ÖZMEN, S., DEMİRCİ, E. (2019). Assessment of cyber abuse in sexually abused children and adolescents. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 58–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/361046

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Internet and gaming addiction: a systematic literature review of neuroimaging studies. Brain Sci 2012;2:347-74
  2. Lenhart A, Madden M, Smith A, Purcell K, Zickurh K, Rainie L. Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project 2011
  3. Patchin JW, Hinduja S. Bullies move beyond the schoolyard a preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence Juv Justice 2006;4:148-69
  4. Juvonen J, Gross EF. Extending the school grounds?--Bullying experiences in cyberspace. J Sch Health 2008;78:496-505
  5. Hinduja S, Patchin J. Cyberbullying: an exploratory analysis of factors related to off ending and victimization. Deviant Behav 2008;29:129-56
  6. Williams KR, Guerra NG. Prevalence and predictors of Internet bullying. J Adolesc Health 2007;41:14-21
  7. Philips F, Morrissey G. Cyberstalking and cyberpredators: a threat to safe sexuality on the Internet. Convergence 2004;10: 66-79
  8. Mitchell KJ, Wolak J, Finkelhor D. Trends in youth reports of sexual solicitations, harassment and unwanted exposure to pornography on the Internet. J Adolesc Health 2007;40:116-26
  9. Quayle E, Taylor M. Young people who sexually abuse: The role of the new technologies. In: Erooga M, Masson H, eds. Children and young people who sexually abuse others: Current developments and practice responses, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2006
  10. İșeri E. Cinsel istismar. In: Çetin FÇ, Pehlivantürk B, Ünal F, eds. Çocuk ve Ergen Psikiyatrisi Temel Kitabı, 1.Baskı. Ankara: Hekimler Yayın Birliği. 2008;470-477
  11. Barth J, Bermetz L, Heim E, Trelle S, Tonia T. The current prevalence of child sexual abuse worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Public Health 2013;58:469-83
  12. Berson IR, Berson MJ, Ferron JM. Emerging risks of violence in the digital age: lessons for educators from an online study of adolescent girls in the United States. Meridian 2002;5:1-32
  13. Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D, Wolak J. Risk factors for and impact of online sexual solicitation of youth. JAMA 2001;285:3011-4
  14. Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D, Wolak J. The exposure of youth to unwanted sexual material on the Internet: a national survey of risk, impact, and prevention. Youth Soc 2003;34:330-358
  15. Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ. Youth engaging in online harassment: associations with caregiver-child relationships, internet use, and personal characteristics. J Adolesc 2004;27:319-36
  16. Ybarra ML, Mi