Journals / The European Research Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 6

Family history in developmental dysplasia of the hip: should we follow-up?

Pages
957–961
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Patients with a normal screening US result and having risk factors can be discharged from follow up safely, so that unnecessary examinations and family anxiety will be reduced.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is an important problem.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ultrasonography (US) is a proper method before 6 months of age.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patients with a normal screening US result and having risk factors can be discharged from follow up safely, so that unnecessary examinations and family anxiety will be reduced.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Developmental dysplasia of the hip · Graf method · ultrasound

Abstract

Objectives: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is an important problem. Ultrasonography (US) is a proper method before 6 months of age. For older children, plain radiographs can be useful. Six risk factors are emphasized: breech presentation, female sex, a positive family history, being first-born, left hip affected, and mode of delivery. In some centers, clinicians prefer to perform a control US examination or pelvic radiographs after 6 months of age for the children having a positive family history. We aimed to evaluate the necessity of control US/direct radiography examinations. Methods: A total of 205 children with a positive family history for DDH are included. US examinations are performed according to Graf’s method. We have evaluated direct radiographs by using Hilgenreiner, Perkin, and Shenton lines, acetabular angle. Results: Initial US examinations are performed at a median age of 8.3 weeks. Seventy-four patients (36%) had a repeat ultrasound scan at a median age of 7 months; none of them demonstrated abnormal findings. One hundred and thirty-one patients (63.9%) had control radiographs at a median age of 8.2 months. Shenton line is considered as normal, and the upper femoral epiphysis is located in inferomedial quadrant according to Hilgenreiner and Perkin lines. Conclusions: A positive family history for DDH may be a less important reason for performing control US or radiographic examination. Patients with a normal screening US result and having risk factors can be discharged from follow up safely, so that unnecessary examinations and family anxiety will be reduced.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, S., FATİHOĞLU, E. (2019). Family history in developmental dysplasia of the hip: should we follow-up?. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 6, 957–961. https://ajindex.com/articles/361013

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kyung BS, Lee SH, Jeong WK, Park SY. Disparity between clinical and ultrasound examinations in neonatal hip screening. Clin Orthop Surg 2016;8:203-9
  2. Teixeira SR, Dalto VF, Maranho DA, Zoghbi-Neto OS, Volpon JB, Nogueira-Barbosa MH. Comparison between Graf method and pubo-femoral distance in neutral and flexion positions to diagnose developmental dysplasia of the hip. Eur J Radiol 2015;84:301-6
  3. Thallinger C, Pospischill R, Ganger R, Radler C, Krall C, Grill F. Long-term results of a nationwide general ultrasound screening system for developmental disorders of the hip: the Austrian hip screening program. J Child Orthop 2014;8:3-10
  4. Shorter D, Hong T, Osborn DA. Cochrane Review: Screening programmes for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborn infants. Evid Based Child Health 2013;8:11-54
  5. Orak MM, Onay T, Cagirmaz T, Elibol C, Elibol FD, Centel T. The reliability of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip: How reliable is it in different hands? Indian J Orthop 2015;49:610-4
  6. Mahan ST, Katz JN, Kim YJ. To screen or not to screen? A decision analysis of the utility of screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:1705-19
  7. Schwend RM, Schoenecker P, Richards BS, Flynn JM, Vitale M, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North A. Screening the newborn for developmental dysplasia of the hip: now what do we do? J Pediatr Orthop 2007;27:607-10
  8. Sewell MD, Eastwood DM. Screening and treatment in developmental dysplasia of the hip-where do we go from here? Int Orthop 2011;35:1359-67
  9. Roposch A, Moreau NM, Uleryk E, Doria AS. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy for US. Radiology 2006;241:854-60
  10. Ortiz-Neira CL, Paolucci EO, Donnon T. A meta-analysis of common risk factors associated with the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:e344-51
  11. Garvey M, Donoghue VB, Gorman WA, O'Brien N, Murphy JF. Radiographic screening at four months of infants at risk for congenital hip dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74:704-7
  12. Tafazal S, Flowers MJ. Do we need to follow up an early normal ultrasound with a later plain radiograph in children with a family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2015;25:1171-5
  13. Keller MS, Nijs EL. The role of radiographs and US in developmental dysplasia of the hip: how good are they? Pediatr Radiol 2009;39 Suppl 2:S211-5. [1