Journals / The European Research Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Outcomes of surgical practice on tubo-ovarian abscess in an academic hospital

Pages
80–87
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: In terms of surgical approach for tubo-ovarian abscess, laparoscopy is more effective than laparotomy for shorter duration of postoperative antibiotic use, operation time and length of hospital stay.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: We aimed to analyseour experience in the surgical management of tubo-ovarian abscess at a tertiary hospital.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: The mean largest diameter of the abscess in the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups were similar (p = 0.520).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: In terms of surgical approach for tubo-ovarian abscess, laparoscopy is more effective than laparotomy for shorter duration of postoperative antibiotic use, operation time and length of hospital stay.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Laparoscopy · laparotomy · pelvic inflammatory disease

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to analyseour experience in the surgical management of tubo-ovarian abscess at a tertiary hospital. Methods: Data from patients who underwent laparoscopy or laparotomyfor treatment of tubo-ovarian abscess were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical and surgical outcomes of patients with tubo-ovarian abscess were compared according to the applied surgical approach. Results: The mean largest diameter of the abscess in the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups were similar (p = 0.520). The mean day for total antibiotic use was significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group (10.00 ± 4.37 day vs 17.91 ± 6.59 day; p = 0.002). All cases in the laparotomy group needed to change the antibiotic regimen, but it was needed only in 28.58% of patients in the laparoscopy group. However, preoperative fever and pulse rate was significantly higher in laparotomy group than in the laparoscopy group (p = 0.004, p = 0.014; respectively). There was no statistical difference in terms of applied surgical procedure betweenthetwo groups. The most applied surgical procedure was abscess drainage in both of the groups (71.42%, 90.90%; respectively). The median operation time in patients with laparoscopy was statistically shorter than in patients with laparotomy (65.50 [58-93] minutes vs 84 [74-90] minutes, p = 0.048). In comparison of postoperative complications between two groups, there was no statistically significant difference. We observed statistically significant declination in white blood cell count and C-reactive protein values at the postoperative 7th day in all patients (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: In terms of surgical approach for tubo-ovarian abscess, laparoscopy is more effective than laparotomy for shorter duration of postoperative antibiotic use, operation time and length of hospital stay.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZGİN, B., AKIN, M. N., KASAP, B. (2021). Outcomes of surgical practice on tubo-ovarian abscess in an academic hospital. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 80–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/360943

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Fouks Y, Cohen Y, Tulandi T, Meiri A, Levin I, Almog B, et al. Complicated clinical course and poor reproductive outcomes of women with tubo-ovarian abscess after fertility treatments. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019;26:162-8
  2. Tao X, Ge SQ, Chen L, Cai LS, Hwang MF, Wang CL. Relationships between female infertility and female genital infections and pelvic inflammatory disease: a population-based nested controlled study. Clinics 2018;73:e364
  3. Fouks Y, Cohen A, Shapira U, Solomon N, Almog B, Levin I. Surgical intervention in patients with tubo-ovarian abscess: clinical predictors and a simple risk score. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019;26:535-43
  4. Workowski KA, Bolan GA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 2015;64:1-137
  5. Brun JL, Graesslin O, Fauconnier A, Verdon R, Agostini A, Bourret A, et al. Updated French guidelines for diagnosis and management of pelvic inflammatory disease. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016;134:121-5
  6. Jaiyeoba O, Lazenby G, Soper DE. Recommendations and rationale for the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2011;9:61-70
  7. Chan GMF, Fong YF, Ng KL. Tubo-ovarian abscesses: epidemiology and predictors for failed response to medical management in an Asian population. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2019;2019:4161394
  8. Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Summary of 2015 CDC Treatment Guidelines. J Miss State Med Assoc 2015;56:372-5
  9. Ross J, Judlin P, Jensen J; International Union against sexually transmitted infections. 2012 European guideline for the management of pelvic inflammatory disease. Int J STD AIDS 2014;25:1-7
  10. Henry-Suchet J. Laparoscopic treatment of tubo-ovarian abscess: thirty years' experience. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002;9:235-7
  11. Hsiao SM, Hsieh FJ, Lien YR. Tubo-ovarian abscesses in postmenopausal women. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2006;45:234-8. 12.Rosen M, Breitkopf D, Waud K. Tubo-ovarian abscess management options for women who desire fertility. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2009;64:681-9
  12. Farid H, Lau TC, Karmon AE, Styer AK. Clinical characteristics associated with antibiotic treatment failure for tubo-ovarian abscesses. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2016;2016:5120293
  13. Akkurt MÖ, Yalçın SE, Akkurt İ, Tatar B, Yavuz A, Yalçın Y, et al. The evaluation of risk factors for failed response to conservative treatment in tubo-ovarian abscesses. J Turkish Ger Gynecol Assoc 2015;16:226-30
  14. Venn A, Watson